Cigarette Smoking Ban

Recently, some cities have been passing ordinances that state that inner-city bars and clubs must be smoke free. People can't even light up outside in these cities. The city govnerments support these ordinances by citing the damages of second hand smoke on others.

What’s your take on the smoke-free city movement?

Private business owners should decide whether to allow smoking in their establishments.

Aside from that, I don't know.

Delaware has banned smoking in all indoor public spaces recently, including bars. There is an opening in the law to allow certain places to become "private clubs" where smoking is allowed inside.

I have to say I support the indoor ban. While I don't really like to walk past a crowd of patrons and waitstaff outside the front of a restaurant, madly puffing away before going back in, I have to say it beats the hell out of having them inside in an open "smoking section" that has no walls and shares its HVAC system with the general populace.

Bar owners swear that it is hurting their business, but thruthfully, at the places I've been to recently (admittedly no real saloon-typ places), I don't see it.

So, I definitely support the public/indoor ban, with places like stadiums being defined as "indoor" even though they are open-air.

i think we should have a smoke free world everywhere, when people smoke they are just not hurting themseleves, but they are hurting people all around them

I do not think an adult needs his government to tell him or her what to do and when. You don't like smoke go to a smoke free Bar resturant..vote with your wallet..keep the government out of my life period.

It's a public health issue. Secondhand smoking has been found time and time again to be extremely hazardous to health.

Any smoker who can't put away their cigarettes long enough to have a drink at a bar clearly has addiction problems and can't preform other simple tasks in life. In Illinois, you can't smoke in an office building (meaning smokers could never have an office job) and since the 1980's, you can't smoke on airplanes (meaning smokers can't travel quickly). Smokers' cars are worth less, too.

Quote:

I do not think an adult needs his government to tell him or her what to do and when.

Pretend you like the hamburgers at one place, constantly filled with smokers. What are you going to do if you're asmhatic or have problems with the smell of smoke? Or, if you consistently enter said burger joint, is it worth risking lung cancer through secondhand smoke?

And - do you actually believe that 'vote with your wallet' crap? It's hard enough to convince people to vote in the normal fashion; and I - a loyal voter, taxpayer, and event-follower don't even believe voting with a wallet will make a difference.

Quote:

Originally posted by M5Power
And - do you actually believe that 'vote with your wallet' crap?

No.

Personally, I think that trying to vote with your wallet is akin to cutting off your nose to spite your face.

And this from someone who couldn't get access to any decent consumer electronics until the 1990s due to his parent's refusal to buy Japanese products...

Quote:

Originally posted by M5Power
[b]It's a public health issue. Secondhand smoking has been found time and time again to be extremely hazardous to health.]

I wonder how much cigarette smoke contributes to others health problems compaired to ohhhh....let's say ...factories pumping out polution into the air or autos doing the same thing

Quote:

Any smoker who can't put away their cigarettes long enough to have a drink at a bar clearly has addiction problems and can't preform other simple tasks in life.

Anyone who has to put anyhing down to go and get a drink at a bar clearly has addiction problems and can't perform other simple tasks in life.

Quote:

Pretend you like the hamburgers at one place, constantly filled with smokers. What are you going to do if you're asmhatic or have problems with the smell of smoke? Or, if you consistently enter said burger joint, is it worth risking lung cancer through secondhand smoke?

I like going into a restraunt and not getting all smokie but to regulate what privately owned buisness can do on this issue is a little too much. If I don't like a place because there is too much smoke then I don't go there. Is it worth getting lung cancer through second hand smoke? Hell no. But if someone is stupid enough to continue to patronize a place that is a health risk to them then they get what they deserve.


I have left restraunts before for many reasons. One of them is because the smoke was offensive because there wasn't enough ventilation in the smoking section. I let the hostess know why we were leaving. I haven't been back since then. Will they miss me? No. But I wont miss them either.

We have choices. We can spend our money and our time where we want to. If you choose to do it in a smoke filled environment then it's your choice and not the governments.





.

Give up smoking at once. It will kill you.

Quote:

Originally posted by vat_man
Give up smoking at once. It will kill you.

Agreed.

Too bad it's not just that easy.

And i agree with the smoking ban. It's a step somewhere to less somkers here...

Starting July 1st, smoking is banned in all public establishments where by 25% or more of their total revenue is generated by food sales in the State of Florida. Yes, I voted for it (somehow, there was a rider on the bill that made Jeb Bush governor again, though). I'm not a big bar-hopper; I'll have an occasional drink at a restaurant or a friend's house.

I fully agree, if you can't eat without needing an immediate smoke, you have a serious problem with your life, and you need not hurt others with second-hand smoke. This is not about government stepping in; the people have spoken, and we got what the majority of the population wanted...for once.

However, I think the 50-foot radius/distance rule should also be enforced in public places, it does little good to get swamped by a dozen smokers as soon as you exit the office or store. Make a designated smoking area in a park, or on public property, too, because it's harder to enjoy the little bit of outdoors one encounters in an urban or suburban area without someone infesting the air with cigarette smoke.

Quote:

Originally posted by DGB454
I wonder how much cigarette smoke contributes to others health problems compaired to ohhhh....let's say ...factories pumping out polution into the air or autos doing the same thing

I hope you're not likening the two.

Every year in the United States, about 450,000 people die due to smoking - that's twenty percent of all deaths. I couldn't come across ONE non-self-afflicted factory or automobile pollution death searching Google.

The health risk from secondhand smoke is about the exact same - the only difference is that you're not inhaling as often as the person doing the actual smoking. You're still getting every one of the same effects.

Quote:

Anyone who has to put anyhing down to go and get a drink at a bar clearly has addiction problems and can't perform other simple tasks in life.

I said that a smoker who can't sit down for twenty minutes to have a drink clearly has no self-control about their addiction. Being able to walk away from something to have one drink isn't similarly related to not being able to be smoke-free for twenty minutes.

Quote:

Originally posted by Giancarlo

Too bad it's not just that easy.

Oh but it is.

Quote:

Originally posted by GilesGuthrie
No.

Personally, I think that trying to vote with your wallet is akin to cutting off your nose to spite your face.

And this from someone who couldn't get access to any decent consumer electronics until the 1990s due to his parent's refusal to buy Japanese products...

What decent consumer electronics were there in the 1980's?

Quote:

Originally posted by M5Power
Every year in the United States, about 450,000 people die due to smoking - that's twenty percent of all deaths.

I find it hard to believe that one fifth of all deaths are caused by any one thing. Will I bother to check it out? Nope.

Quote:

...a smoker who can't sit down for twenty minutes to have a drink clearly has no self-control about their addiction. Being able to walk away from something to have one drink isn't similarly related to not being able to be smoke-free for twenty minutes.

Some people like to enjoy their boose and a smoke together. A Bombay and a Nat Sherman, for example, or a Scotch and Cuban. It's part of the scene, as it were, and I don't understand what the big deal is. Some people only smoke when they drink.

There's nothing more that I would love than to see all the cig smoke dissapear from the bar scene, it's groose, it affects my systems, it's dirty, and not smoking anymore, I could really enjoy not having to inhale it. But as it was stated before, milefile said I think, that the place of business should be able to decide if smoking should be allowed or not. Basically what these laws are telling us is that we cannot decided for ourselves what is or isn't a healthy environment. Better yet, they should have bars that wern't allowed to serve alchohol, and casino's that wern't allowed to have gambling machines...

It all makes such perfect sence...

Quote:

Originally posted by milefile
[b]I find it hard to believe that one fifth of all deaths are caused by any one thing. Will I bother to check it out? Nope.

I found it slightly hard to believe too, but I looked it up on Google. And Google never lies.

Quote:

Originally posted by M5Power


I hope you're not likening the two.

Every year in the United States, about 450,000 people die due to smoking - that's twenty percent of all deaths. I couldn't come across ONE non-self-afflicted factory or automobile pollution death searching Google.

The health risk from secondhand smoke is about the exact same - the only difference is that you're not inhaling as often as the person doing the actual smoking. You're still getting every one of the same effects.

The reason it's hard to find statistics on how many people die from factory and auto emissions is because it's hard to link them to a specific cause of death. Think about it though...How many cars are on the road and how many factories are there? There is no way that all those smokers are creating more pollution than the other 2. If someone dies from lung problems or even "natural causes" how do you know that polution from emissions didn't cause it or at the very least speed it along?

Don't get me wrong..I'm not an advocate of smoking but I am an advocate of choice and non government interferience.

Quote:

Originally posted by M5Power
The health risk from secondhand smoke is about the exact same - the only difference is that you're not inhaling as often as the person doing the actual smoking. You're still getting every one of the same effects.[/b]

Indeed - and the smoker has the benefit of the filter.

There's a few newbies around here, so I'll give you some background on my personal axe to grind. If you've heard this before, move on to the next post.
[rant]
I'm 32. In Feb last year I lost my mother due to a smoking related lung cancer. She quit smoking in 1983. She was 59.

In Nov '97 I lost my father due to smoking related stomach/liver cancer. He gave up smoking in 1988. He was 59.

Both sides of the family have a very good history of longetivity - except for the smokers. I don't smoke. I used to have one say once every 1-2 years if I was out drinking, basically because of the cool 'drunk' effect cigarettes give when you're not used to them. Don't do that anymore.

If you plan to have kids, and smoke, think about this. Do you want your kids to bury you when they're in their late 20's/early 30's?

I'm reasonably successful in life - career's okay, got a nice house, nice car, fantastic partner. Shame the folks aren't around to share. I would give almost anything for one more round of golf with the old man, or for mum to come up to Sydney to stay with us - it's a pain I have to deal with everyday.

Just stop. Stop right now. Your addiction is in your head.
[/rant]

I agree Vat_Man. If you smoke then stop. If you don't smoke then don't start.