- 318
- WonderLand
- Balistic_knife__
In B spec la sarthe seasonal, why is this car always lagging behind? is it its specs? it seems on par with the other cars in this event, so why is is being destroyed by a mere R390? Im just curious
Because the R10 in GT5 goes to real life specs... from an old thread I made:
Car (REAL LIFE HP / GT5 HP)
Audi R8 '01 (610 / 822)
Audi R8 '05 (520 / 818)
Bentley Speed 8 (615 / 814)
BMW V12 LMR (580 / 764)
Pescarolo Courage-Judd GV5 (600 / 770)
Pescarolo C60 Hybride (660 / 905 )
Pescarolo Courage C60 Peugeot (510 / 828)
Peugeot 908 (700 / 725)
Toyota GT-One (600 / 803)
Thanks for this. I'll have to see how the RL times compare with GT5 when you have the right amount of power. 👍
Also I can't believe the Pescarolo had that much of a power advantage in 2005. Will they ever get a better chance of winning?
Because the R10 in GT5 goes to real life specs... from an old thread I made:
Car (REAL LIFE HP / GT5 HP)
Audi R8 '01 (610 / 822)
Audi R8 '05 (520 / 818)
Bentley Speed 8 (615 / 814)
BMW V12 LMR (580 / 764)
Pescarolo Courage-Judd GV5 (600 / 770)
Pescarolo C60 Hybride (660 / 905 )
Pescarolo Courage C60 Peugeot (510 / 828)
Peugeot 908 (700 / 725)
Toyota GT-One (600 / 803)
Thanks for this. I'll have to see how the RL times compare with GT5 when you have the right amount of power. 👍
Also I can't believe the Pescarolo had that much of a power advantage in 2005. Will they ever get a better chance of winning?
Could it be that all of the games prototypes are not setup to Le Mans rules and regulation? Like power, weight, etc.? So say like the 1000 HP Pescarolo when you put a turbo in it, and still 900+ HP stock?
FurinkazenI thought that actually, I thought maybe they run to an unrestricted full bore kind of regulation...
Also I can't believe the Pescarolo had that much of a power advantage in 2005. Will they ever get a better chance of winning?
That wouldn't work for the NA cars, because they didn't have "unlimited" tunes.Could it be that all of the games prototypes are not setup to Le Mans rules and regulation
No. In 2005 the race was basically Pescarolo's to lose, even though they were the massive underdog. The R8 was aging and heavily restricted to meet the hybrid rules used that year because it couldn't be adapted successfully; whereas the Pescarolo chassis was able to adapt to them much better so it didn't require the horsepower or weight penalty. It was a much faster car, took pole, had the fastest lap and the fastest trap speed.
Then it broke. And them's the breaks, I suppose.
That wouldn't work for the NA cars, because they didn't have "unlimited" tunes.
Well, they did for qualifying purposes, but not "200 extra horsepower" unlimited tunes. PD's numbers are just imaginary for the sake of being imaginary.
No. In 2005 the race was basically Pescarolo's to lose, even though they were the massive underdog. The R8 was aging and heavily restricted to meet the hybrid rules used that year because it couldn't be adapted successfully; whereas the Pescarolo chassis was able to adapt to them much better so it didn't require the horsepower or weight penalty. It was a much faster car, took pole, had the fastest lap and the fastest trap speed.
Then it broke. And them's the breaks, I suppose.
No. In 2005 the race was basically Pescarolo's to lose, even though they were the massive underdog. The R8 was aging and heavily restricted to meet the hybrid rules used that year because it couldn't be adapted successfully; whereas the Pescarolo chassis was able to adapt to them much better so it didn't require the horsepower or weight penalty. It was a much faster car, took pole, had the fastest lap and the fastest trap speed.
Then it broke. And them's the breaks, I suppose.