And you know this 1:1 ratio how?For every good one there's a bad one, thus ruined. Obviously.
don't claim something that is entirely false without citation...I was hoping that would have come off as an example and not taken in a literal sense but nice to know there's always at least one nitpicker.
Examples are literal.I was hoping that would have come off as an example and not taken in a literal sense but nice to know there's always at least one nitpicker.
don't claim something that is entirely false without citation...
It's against the AUP
Well one thing is that you can't trade cars. This way they won't spread like wildfire when modders crack the code
Examples are literal.
You spelled improve wrong.
"Improved by modders."
Perhaps Kaz/PD are smart enough to realize that since every version of GT so far has had hybriding, it's inevitable, and he's not concerned about it. Perhaps hybriding could just as easily drive sales since most of the hardcore fans have bought the game before the hybriding starts and some people might be attracted to the game for that purpose. Perhaps.Perhaps the GT5 modders ruined the possibility of trading in GT6. In which case, aspects of GT6 were ruined by modders before it was even released.
Ironic that you point out my supposed misinterpretation while at the same time completely missing what was obvious sarcasm. Sounds like you're jumping the gun on all fronts tonightI think @Downhill Dino meant "as an expression", not "example". It clearly wasn't meant to be a literal statement. There's no actual way to calculate good/bad "modder ratios". That was nitpicking. And a ridiculous thing to nitpick @, at that.
And here we are... Back in internet English class...
If not, citation needed.I don't beleive I've posted anything against the AUP, which I'm familiar with so no need to quote it in response, but prove me wrong if you wish.
- You will not knowingly post any material that is false, misleading, or inaccurate.
Perhaps the GT5 modders ruined the possibility of trading in GT6. In which case, aspects of GT6 were ruined by modders before it was even released.
You spelled improve wrong.
"Improved by modders."
The word "wrongly" should modify "spelled", should it not?You spelled improve wrongly.
Wrong is an adjective.
Wrongly is an adverb that modifies the verb "improve".
Correct yourself first before correcting others!
The word "wrongly" should modify "spelled", should it not?
Yes, sorry it modifies the verb SpellThe word "wrongly" should modify "spelled", should it not?
You spelled improve wrongly.
Wrong is an adjective.
Wrongly is an adverb that modifies the verb "improve".
Correct yourself first before correcting others!
Using an expression in the same context as to what this thread is about, is not the best idea and was taken as an "example"...So basically you ignored the very post you quoted. Good job. It's just an expression (Thanks @SZRT Ice that's the word I was looking for), and was never meant to be an actual ratio.
I asked for you to prove me wrong on my apparent AUP breaking post and you have nothing, because my post didn't even mean 1:1. Is this hard to understand?
For every good one there's a bad one
Only by people with a thorough grasp of english.So basically you ignored the very post you quoted. Good job. It's just an expression (Thanks @SZRT Ice that's the word I was looking for), and was never meant to be an actual ratio. I asked for you to prove me wrong on my apparent AUP breaking post and you have nothing, because my post didn't even mean 1:1. Is this hard to understand?
I raced extensively in GT5 online and even moreso during the hybrid era. Never once encountered an unrealistic hybrid in a circuit racing room. Much like the swine flu, bird flu, climate change, etc....the fear of hybriding is 99%hysteria/1%common sense.I have only seen the occasional modder online so far and I have never ever been crashed into by one, which is a huge improvement over GT5
So this far I'm not bothered at all.