- 759
- UAE
- THEPUNISHER__UAE
Soo its really great chance that gt6 will have less cars than GT5?
Soo its really great chance that gt6 will have less cars than GT5?
Soo its really great chance that gt6 will have less cars than GT5?
Depends on your outlook, it'll certainly include more cars I'll actually use if they double the Premium selection.
I doubt they can manage the same amount of cars included in GT4 so if they finally remove the Standard cars you obviously have less cars left yet far more quality cars (as in how they're modelled obviously) and a more consistent quality overall.
And let's be honest here, there aren't really a 1000 completely unique cars included now anyway so if they manage around 500 'unique' Premium cars representing a wide range of categories, I guess nobody needs to feel shortchanged as nothing much will have changed apart from all cars having the same features like cockpit view (not a black silhouette), etc.
Ofcourse if you don't care about Standard/Premium you might lose a few cars you like but that happened in previous GT-games as well.
They can't carry previous gen bagage forever I suppose but then again I didn't really understand (or more accurately, liked) the inclusion of Standard cars anyway.
Would be interesting to see the same thread about.... tracks.
Actually in GT5 I still have lot of cars to try, but no more "rarely used" tracks. Asphalt is consumed.
Would be interesting to see the same thread about.... tracks.
Actually in GT5 I still have lot of cars to try, but no more "rarely used" tracks. Asphalt is consumed.
Yes but that's a separate issue, I'll agree I was surprised some GT4 tracks didn't reappear whilst others did, if quality wasn't the main factor (just look at Trial Mountain or Laguna Seca) I wonder what was? Yet, I have to say with the Course Creator I can always drive on new tracks offline (online too but there's the unfamiliarity factor which limits its competitive use) and you can create lovely stuff using it, even though the same scenery gets increasingly boring now.
And again, I strongly disagree with this. It does not harm to have more of the "same models", if they have relevant mechanical changes.I think PD should get rid of the same cars all over and over again. For example when you have a car which is "93' MR" ,"93' SR", "93' GR"...i mean the differences in that car are going to be insignificant and basically is the same model over and over again. We don´t need that anymore. Those models in that case have differences in the interior or in some body kits, and we can change those things in the tuning section. So having one basic model of each is going to be better.
When it is a different year and if the car looks different like Mitsubishi EVO´s for example...there is no problem at all. [...]
Agreed!!!👍I think PD should get rid of the same cars all over and over again. For example when you have a car which is "93' MR" ,"93' SR", "93' GR"...i mean the differences in that car are going to be insignificant and basically is the same model over and over again. We don´t need that anymore. Those models in that case have differences in the interior or in some body kits, and we can change those things in the tuning section. So having one basic model of each is going to be better.
When it is a different year and if the car looks different like Mitsubishi EVO´s for example...there is no problem at all.
I think PD should get rid of the same cars all over and over again. For example when you have a car which is "93' MR" ,"93' SR", "93' GR"...i mean the differences in that car are going to be insignificant and basically is the same model over and over again. We don´t need that anymore. Those models in that case have differences in the interior or in some body kits, and we can change those things in the tuning section. So having one basic model of each is going to be better.
When it is a different year and if the car looks different like Mitsubishi EVO´s for example...there is no problem at all.
And again, I strongly disagree with this. It does not harm to have more of the "same models", if they have relevant mechanical changes.
I wouldn't want to lose my '97 Camaro Z28 just because there's a '97 Camaro SS as well, which looks almost the same except for an air scoop, for example. Different engine (torque/power curves), sound, gear ratios, and also different power class when stock (this is an important factor for online races with stock cars. The more variations with different power levels, the better. No, the power limiter doesn't cut it. It's unrealistic and makes powerbands ugly to drive).
I still have to read valid arguments for having less cars.
This.As many as possible without having a single 'standard' car.
I still have to read valid arguments for having less cars.
i'm gtr fan , obviously , but i didn't like that amount of skylines in gt5 and i dont even mind the duplicate thing BUT don't duplicate if you have trouble in develop time like what happened in gt5 , if you don't have time just make a descent amount of cars with descent quality that match the name of the game , lets say 600 cars ( premium as some people wants to call it ) with full details and without any thing wrong .
i mean if you want to put 50 of the same car , its alright but don't begin with the idea of large amount of the same cars only if you know ( pd and kaz ) that you can take care of them like what happened in GT5 3 skylines premium and 325943249 skyline got ps1 details/graphic .
I'm hoping for at least 100 new premiums if it's coming by 2013. As for standards, why not? Cause they look bad? If I can have the chance to DRIVE more cars, and standard is an option due to time restritions, I"ll take it. One of the few example is the new Jaguar car that you can win from the Top Gear challenge or the Bugatti Veyron. Even though I don't use it much, I'd rather have it, than not have it just because it isn't premium.
..but seriously, they're not that horrible to look at. Don't like it? Don't drive it.