Separate names with a comma.
Yes it is.
So, you threw into the skip all the evidence against your accusation.
With this tactic is very easy to have reason on your side.
But that`s fine,...
Ok, lets start with the CFIT.
In my opinion, that is either incomplete or invalid.
This is the way it is described:
The description did not...
I stated a fact and the statement of a fact can only be true or untrue, never a guess.
And what you said about that statement?
What other possibilities?
The only possibility that can be extracted from the information that we have now is pilot suicide.
Anything else is pure...
Yes, I said all that.
Now can you highlight where I said that the pilot committed suicide?
Or you have no proof for your accusation against me?
No, I never said that.
No, I have no explanations for this accident.
Guys, stop trying to force me to admit that I said something I never said.
But what I said is not a theory, is a fact.
I have no theories about this accident.
And I have no conclusions also.
But only if this coincidences occurred:
- The plane wasn`t on autopilot.
- The pilot initiated the descend while blacking out.
That do not explain this accident, the autopilot should have kept the plane in the flight path, just like the Helios one.
Of course I know.
I never said that.
I only mentioned a fact, so there's no speculation involved from my side.
What does this have to do with your mistake?
You do not know how to do the simplest of the calculations and, instead of recognise your mistake,...
Of course it is.
Any conclusion must be reached after a comprehensive investigation and this takes a long time (years in some cases) to be...
That leave to much questions unanswered.
Why they did kept a speed (+/-700km/h) in excess of the triple necessary to avoid a stall (+/-230km/h)...
Decompression do not explain the speed and the altitude at impact.
And this is considering only that graphic.
They did not deviate...
Now is my turn to said that you both do not know what you are talking about.
Anyway, from now we would be repeating ourselves and I have no more...
That`s means absolutely nothing.
Only an official source does.
No, you are lying, that is the explanation from McLaren, not F1 themselves....
Can you explain why?
No, I do not know then.
Can you tell me, please, your sources of that information?
No, that do not explain the lack of...
Now you only need to explain the lack of damage.
And he says that with the fame, the privacy disappears.
You do not see, but they have that duty, responsibility and obligation.
That`s the two sides of the same coin and you only can choose one of...