they are 1/2m above the surface, and I think every point has been covered, not the first time I add pits to a track, I'll check again
TUTORIAL - Build your FIRST track - BASIC GUIDE
LAST UPDATE : Dec 2021 *** I’ll try and explain in few steps what is needed in order to export your first track in AC. However, this is not intended...assettocorsamods.net
i tried adding some pit boxes for this autopolis version, by duplicating and renaming the existing AC_START_ and AC_PIT_ objectsCannot see any problem there..
Probably you have made edits with the AC_PIT and AC_START left on track so when exported these nodes lost their origins and axis rotation.
Remove all AC_? nodes from this save and use the ones from the original track if there were any
Edit: ninja'd by @El Locho
Lights work for me using these values:
[HEADER]
VERSION=3
FLASHING_BLINK_TIME=0.35
FLASHING_REPEAT=1
KERS_BLINKING=0
NO_LIGHT_SWITCH=0
That's the distance at which the car will turn invisible.
This may be because you have exported the kn5 (with its original pitboxes) from the map, and the pitboxes are loaded through a models file, check how many .kn5 are in the track folder, if you have to load by models, the problem may be there.
It's the average temperature of your graphics card when you race with 20 cars with no lods. You choose if C of F.
That why I argued some weeks ago for the great effort they put on graphics instead of physics. Then they tried to burn me but I managed to escape 😂Is a driving simulator, even there are some road cars, the purpose while i'm on track is to race (alone or against AI/Online) not to make the tour of some cities
Simulating physics is always a problem:
Did you unpack the data.acd before editing them in game? If not that's the problem.
For me VRC is much better
I tried many professional simulators with AC installed with custom cars. They were amazing. I can agree with you on the fact that we community aren't so physics expert nor we have access to data for every single car but I can argue from the fact that a little less effort on graphics and little more on physics could have made this game less messy with TONS of good looking mods...
Mods CAN'T HAVE real physics unless modder have access to real-life data from drivers or team, so at least only 1%, the others are completely random-closer-value but for sure not real 100%.
Yes I agree, the purpose of assetto corsa is entertainment for sim players. Some kind of Gran Turismo but more realistic.Mods CAN'T HAVE real physics unless modder have access to real-life data from drivers or team, so at least only 1%, the others are completely random-closer-value but for sure not real 100%.
In order to be sell, AC needs at that time, to be better over rFactor which was extremely good on physics but not good on graphics. That was the fortune of AC.
Real car in game can't be handled by most of the casual sim-racer, that's why people loved so much AC because it was simulating, but also affordable and playable
Depends on the position of the display inside the car. If it is high enough to fit inside the monitor's viewport so that you can reach it with the mouse you should be able to click the icons with one eye closed.
It seems you never dive into assetto corsa modding world. Now.
