- 4,500
- Australia
We have the same exactly law as Australian , 1/3 of Canadian are from Quebec and i just done my homework and it is now on PD side its discrimination and illegal
No it isn't. Misguided potentially, illegal no.
Last edited:
We have the same exactly law as Australian , 1/3 of Canadian are from Quebec and i just done my homework and it is now on PD side its discrimination and illegal
The thing to keep in mind, especially about the gear and/or outside sponsors like other esport teams: this is primarily about marketing for Polyphony and the FIA to draw a broader audience. That's likely why it's all been partners we've already seen in-game (Puma, Thrustmaster, Tag): the main goal is to increase the visibility of those things. In some minds, having a big esport team with prominent liveries in races will draw attention away from the main event.
Same goes with players' own rigs. Not only is that minimizing the visibility of a sponsor, but it's also potentially removing something of PD's itself: the T-GT is the big tie-in hardware piece with GTS. There's also the fairness and reliability angles: it'd be harder for the team to ensure a foreign setup is kosher for the event, and any disconnects or other issues during a race could open up a whole other can of worms. Blue screens still happen from time to time with the current setup — I can't imagine wanting to add complexity to it!
Maybe like Canada, Sony is only allowing bits of the Netherlands in?Also, it’s “The Netherlands” not “Holland”.
As far as I know, those kinds of regulations are the same in the whole country.Maybe like Canada, Sony is only allowing bits of the Netherlands in?
Although oddly it's written in alphabetical order and "Holland" is where "Netherlands" should be in that list...
their best 10 races across the whole 40-race season - which could be the first 10, the last 10 or dotted about
So, as far as my case is concerned,I am greek and finish 1st in those tournaments and be eligible for the World Finals,PD won't select me because of my country?That's completely unfair in my eyes but there could be another reason as to why this is the way it is.Also,I am 16 and will participate just for fun but I want to know the reasons behind Pd's decisions
Did you study lawWe have the same exactly law as Australian
I have read it and the government did his job PD didn't Quebec law is changed since 2016 ? And why are u asking ?Did you study law
It is Sony, not PD.
Quebec alow eSports competition without regulation since 2016 excluding Quebec is unjustified since plz PD work on itThis is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Kyle Patrick (@SlipZtrEm) on March 18th, 2019 in the Esports category.
Quebec alow eSports competition without regulation since 2016 excluding Quebec is unjustified since plz PD work on it
Round 4 is listed as TBA.
Possibility of a new track in the March 28 update?
Predictions: It could be either another track on the Super Formula calendar (Twin Ring Motegi, Okayama, Sportsland SUGO), or WeatherTech Raceway Laguna Seca as the California 8 Hours will be taking place days after the update is released.
Why then round 8 has Autopolis?Nope, Autopolis is the track, the vehicle category is TBA. So SF, I‘m pretty sure.
Yeah. 3x/20x wear also seems weird for Super Formula cars, they only use tire wear that high for Sports tires. So maybe the current round 4 is a placeholder?Why then round 8 has Autopolis?
Nope, Autopolis is the track, the vehicle category is TBA. So SF, I‘m pretty sure.
Studying law, even in a specific type of law, takes years. So imagine how long it would take to study the law from two different countries!I have read it and the government did his job PD didn't Quebec law is changed since 2016 ? And why are u asking ?
https://www.thescoreesports.com/new...-big-win-in-the-fight-to-end-player-exclusion
And ?Studying law, even in a specific type of law, takes years. So imagine how long it would take to study the law from two different countries!
And ?
You stated that "Quebec law and Australian law are exactly the same." How long did your authority study Australian law and Quebec law to come to this conclusion ?And ?