People frequently point to the GTA series as an example of sexist or misogynistic gaming, but consider this: nowhere in GTA V is there a requirement for the player to knowingly harm a woman. Only two women die over the course of the story - Debra, whose death could be considered self-defence as we never see the actual act; and Molly, whose death is an avoidable accident, and which the player only has a direct hand in. It's possible to kill Ashley during "Mr. Phillips", but it's missable.
Furthermore, GTA V is a game about dishonest people. If you choose the "loud" option for "The Jewel Store Job", Michael boasts to his accomplices that he is a successful thief, but when his son accuses him of being a criminal, he lashes out. Meanwhile, Franklin frequently admonishes Lamar over his ambitions to stay in the gang, but admits to Lester that he enjoys killing people as much as the next person. I say this, because they're hypocrites. But Trevor, on the other hand, is not. Despite his obvious psychopathic tendencies, he does not tell a single lie over the course of the story. More importantly, he is the only person who displays *any* concern for the welfare of Tracy, a vulnerable teenage girl with an absentee father (he also does the same for Jimmy). He also goes to a lot of trouble to protect Patricia, admonishes Wade for calling a woman a bitch, and a lot of his dialogue alludes to his concern for women. His way of expressing all of this is, of course, unhealthy and a result of his obvious issues, and the game does play this up for laughs, but I don't think that dilutes the effect. The only way to make Trevor a compelling and tolerable character was to give him some redeeming qualities.
So why isn't Sarkeesian drawing attention to this? Or does the idea of a male character expressing concern for a woman qualify as sexism?