- 156
- viveRBR
Yes but then you get no credits in arcade mode which is the only way of creating them.
Point taken there đź‘Ť
Yes but then you get no credits in arcade mode which is the only way of creating them.
Technically wut does it change ? You can create them yourself đź‘Ť I personnaly think it's better like that, because I couldn't be bothered doing the entire 24 hours race to get 100% of the game.... And I'm sure if I did one with my 40 go PS3, it would burn after overheating .
endurance races confirmed :
300 km grand valley level 25
4 hours endurance with level 27
500 miles indianapolis level 28
1000 km suzuka level 30 level 32
9 h tsukuba level 33
24 heures du mans level 35
and 24 nurburgring race level 40
But I thought Kaz confirmed that you could save and continue later during endurance events now, no?
endurance races confirmed :
300 km grand valley level 25
4 hours endurance with level 27
500 miles indianapolis level 28
1000 km suzuka level 30
4 h endurance nurburgring level32
9 h tsukuba level 33
24 heures du mans level 35
and 24 nurburgring race level 40
destructoid : 10/10
Playstation Lifestyle : 10/10
What kind of stupid review is that... 10/10, perfect...
What kind of stupid review is that... 10/10, perfect...
The other thing I would recommend is outsourcing some of the car modelling to other companies, so if there are any imperfections they can touch it up themselves. This will allow them to push a lot more premium quality cars and also more tracks, with similar investment but a lot less time and similar quality.
Another criticism I've made of PD is that their attempt to include so many cars. I'd rather have a good racing game, than an encyclopedic car selection (I know some disagree). I was repeatedly assured by GTplanet GT enthusiasts that this would not detract attention from the core aspects of the game, but as it turns out, I suspect I was right. 200 - 300 cars would have been more than sufficient IMO & would have left more time to focus on other aspects of the game, like juicing up the AI & adding a couple more tracks. In other words: quality over quantity.
I also believe, from a business point of view, adding additional cars via paid DLC would have made sense for PD. I respect KY's integrity in trying to put out a "big" game, but I feel that it's possibly not the best strategy.
What kind of stupid review is that... 10/10, perfect...
endurance races confirmed :
300 km grand valley level 25
4 hours endurance with level 27
500 miles indianapolis level 28
1000 km suzuka level 30
4 h endurance nurburgring level32
9 h tsukuba level 33
24 heures du mans level 35
and 24 nurburgring race level 40
Another criticism I've made of PD is that their attempt to include so many cars. I'd rather have a good racing game, than an encyclopedic car selection (I know some disagree). I was repeatedly assured by GTplanet GT enthusiasts that this would not detract attention from the core aspects of the game, but as it turns out, I suspect I was right. 200 - 300 cars would have been more than sufficient IMO & would have left more time to focus on other aspects of the game, like juicing up the AI & adding a couple more tracks. In other words: quality over quantity.
I also believe, from a business point of view, adding additional cars via paid DLC would have made sense for PD. I respect KY's integrity in trying to put out a "big" game, but I feel that it's possibly not the best strategy.
No 10/10 does not mean perfect, it means it's a genre setting, genre changing game, an instant classic that other racers will be judge by, you can give a game 10/10 without perfection. Nothing is perfect, doesnt mean you can't give out a max score.
I agree with your view of what is a 10/10 game.
I don't agree with the 10/10 reviews for GT5 at all though and I believe that they will be rare and extreme. The standard/premium issue is enough for the game to not be a 10 for me.
I wasnt speaking about Gt5 specifically, just saying 10/10 does not mean perfect. Gt5 is NOT a 10/10, its great imo, but too many strange decisions by PD.
Nothing is perfect, doesnt mean you can't give out a max score.
I'm disappointed about the lack of leaderboards--you would think that PD would at least recognize that the vast majority of players would love to compare their best times against friends and other players all across the world and in their region. At least the AI and physics have been greatly improved.
I would say a 10/10 is deserved.
I would say yes, if I was blind... But people gifted with the sense of sight, will not find this very 10/10...
http://image.jeuxvideo.com/images/p3/g/r/gran-turismo-5-playstation-3-ps3-447.jpg
And yes this is GT5 not GT PSP
I would say yes, if I was blind... But people gifted with the sense of sight, will not find this very 10/10...
http://image.jeuxvideo.com/images/p3/g/r/gran-turismo-5-playstation-3-ps3-447.jpg
And yes this is GT5 not GT PSP