I did a search to see if this had been talked about before and I didn't find anything. Why would this get ugly?
No. GT is a pure game, strictly about the cars. I hate Forza 3 for screwing with space-time, but it's okay, because Forza never was as pure as GT.
well give us a good reason why it should? your playing a racing sim game, not a arcade game. when you make mistakes in RL racing you pay for it. should be the same for a racing sim.So... don't use it. But how is that a good reason for not including the feature in the game?
More like if PD keeps on trying to add one stupid feature after another because some fans wants it, the game will never be finished? If people like rewind option and crappy damage and 3D trees, there are plenty of games out there that does it right now. PD shouldn't have to bend over backwards and add junk to their games because certain fans think that certain options might be cool in GT one morning when they woke up.Because everything that is going to happen in this thread is full-collision between two groups of people.
First will say "Whatever" (myself included) because it is just another of options that can help less-hardcore to enjoy their game and I don't care abot it in the same manner I don't care about new genre-pestilence called "track guide".
Second will scream "No" because they think it should bnot be in simulation game no matter what, without taking into account they will not have to use it because it is optional and it is always limited to single player mode.
And there will be no conclusion.
well give us a good reason why it should? your playing a racing sim game, not a arcade game. when you make mistakes in RL racing you pay for it. should be the same for a racing sim.