I wonder how much the addition of police equipment played a role. If a lot of weight is added to the interceptors, then the SUV's might take less of a performance hit, though it's not like the Charger is a light car to begin with.I'm surprised that the Explorer SUV topped a ton of the entries in performance. That's impressive engineering by Ford.
What's weird about this? You should expect the AWD car, with its heavier drive train, to have a longer braking distance.The RWD Chargers were the top of the tree in this [braking] test, slowing down in 126.9 feet with the V6 and 128 feet for the V8. Weirdly, the AWD V8 Charger took 133.8 feet to come to a stop.
Well that weight will also increase the friction of the tires and should more or less cancel out the weight penalty unless you're doing braking cycles where the added weight will contribute to brake fade. Distributing weight to all the tires is probably more influential, and with the Charger being front heavy I'd guess theWhat's weird about this? You should expect the AWD car, with its heavier drive train, to have a longer braking distance.
What's weird about this? You should expect the AWD car, with its heavier drive train, to have a longer braking distance.
You are correct, but these factors only cancel out if friction force scales linearly with respect to vertical load, which turns out to not be true of car tires. As load increases, grip increases, but at a declining rate (scroll down to Section 3 at this link). More discussion here.Well that weight will also increase the friction of the tires and should more or less cancel out the weight penalty ...
The weight difference is less than 200lbs. The RWD Charger is 4,325 lbs whereas the AWD is 4,520 lbs. I don't believe that's not enough to account for a difference of nearly six feet assuming all things are equal on the two cars aside for the drive wheels. It's even stranger that the 4,849 lbs Durango stopped shorter than it too.
Interesting! That seems like something that could be compensated for in the design of the lubrication systems, now that they know to expect it. Hopefully this knowledge will be applied to the next generation of turbocharged police cars, if not as a retrofit to this generation.The Explorer may have been the performance king, but I've heard that because the cars spend most of their time idling that the turbochargers end up not being properly lubricated for most of the time the engine is running, which in turn means the bearings and seals go bad and the turbos fail very rapidly.
Good observation, the numbers are spot on here. From that I'd suppose if they're on the same tires, the rubber might be slightly favor for the RWD. Although if that is the case, it didn't help the RWD configuration on the track.So when you do the math, 4520 lbs is 104.5% of 4325 lbs, and also 133.8 feet is 104.5% of 128 feet. Even I'm surprised at how neatly the numbers worked out.
I don't know if it could be retrofitted easily but it definitely needs to be taken into account in the future. For now I've heard a lot of police departments are replacing their old ecoboost models with the much slower NA versions.Interesting! That seems like something that could be compensated for in the design of the lubrication systems, now that they know to expect it. Hopefully this knowledge will be applied to the next generation of turbocharged police cars, if not as a retrofit to this generation.
Odd that we're just now seeing this article. This story is from way back in early October.
Also interesting is that the cops tested the new Ford Explorer. Nobody at the time seemed to mention that this cop car was the new Explorer in diguise, showing of its new proportions and rear-drive Aviator chassis, and production headlights, etc. It wasn't until a month or more later that Autoblog posted spy photos of the civilian Explorer.
Probably happy that they aren't the guy who got stuck with a Taurus.Everytime I see one of these Explorers it's at WOT with the turbos screaming their heads off. I'm pretty sure the Police enjoy them.
This is the only thing that matters. It's how things like the Impala had such a long run as a police vehicle when everyone hated them and even the W-Bodies GM actually expected people to go into a dealership to pay for (instead of, say, a Camry) started falling apart immediately after the 36,000 miles ran up and had transmissions/suspensions made of balsa wood.… having worked for a Lieutenant of the Columbus Fire Dept. for 15 years, I know, not police but it's the same, but it comes down to the city budget allotment and the best bid. Thats the important word. Bid. Contract costs.
That's why Columbus at least, has changed manufacturers occasionally. He'd say, this new one sucks, last year car or SUV was better. Next year, same story, different brand. Always an American brand. Big three.
I see different manufactured cop cars every few years, too. Known on paper to be worse than other manufacturers.
City budgets over performance.