|
Diamond Member
|
Yeah, and My Mom is just as beautiful as Megan Fox, Lindsay Lohan, Keira Knightley, Anne Hathaway, Miley Cyrus, Scarlett Johansson, Demi Lovato and Selena Gomez. COMBINED.
Do you know what you just said is equal to heresy, Right? How in the hell can a car with A V6 engine and under 300 Horsepower (albeit with a impressive P/W Ratio) beat a trusted Marque who's cars have V8s or V12s in them and can get 400 HP easily with their eyes closed? The Only Ferrari which I think the NSX could have competed with was the Dino. think about it; both cars had a V6, had pretty much the Same Horsepower relative to their time, were built pretty much the same way, and both had Impressive Power-to-weight Numbers. so, to sum it all up, you are either; a. stoned or drunk; b. live in a fantasy world or a alternate universe where Hondas can outperform Ferraris; or c. Just Plain Nuts. Plain and Simple. The NSX was better than Ferraris of the time. Better in that it could actually handle. (and this is in the opinion of testers who drove them, including Gordon Murray) When your reputation is built on building racing cars for the road, that's a huge blow. In fact, you can thank Honda for spurring the line of development that lead to the genuinely worthy F360 and F430. Even today, the NSX handles itself pretty well... it was still (apparently) ahead of the Porsche 911 series in terms of handling up to the 996, and is still well-regarded. It's like the Lotus Elise... why change the car when it was perfect to begin with? Just keep updating it to keep it current... well... at least Lotus understands the importance of power figures to the target audience... and keeps upgrading the engine offerings to suit. The only problem with the NSX is the price-badge ratio... just as some people can't fathom paying over $30,000 for a Hyundai... some cant fathom paying three times that much for a Honda. Doesn't matter whether you are getting what you pay for (aluminum and titanium construction, ultra-lightweight), people have Honda pigeonholed as a "cheap" brand, and that's that. If I had the chance, I would have at least one of them in my garage. Right beside my Ferrari 360 Stradale.
Last edited by niky; Mar 12 2009 at 10:53 PM..
|
||
|
Rolling in the Rollas
|
How in the hell can a car with A V6 engine and under 300 Horsepower (albeit with a impressive P/W Ratio) beat a trusted Marque who's cars have V8s or V12s in them and can get 400 HP easily with their eyes closed?
Put it this way, I doubt it's due to lack of technology that the newest R has less power than its competitors...
|
||
|
Believes in doG
|
The Ferrari around at the time of the NSX's launch was the 348, which had only 300bhp. The NSX had at least 276bhp and was lighter. Even if the 348 had the marginally better power-to-weight ratio, it's handling was unpredictable on the limit. At the time the NSX was the better, if less exotic, car.
|
||
|
GTP's Mendeleev
|
The NSX was still considered a better car well into the late 90's even. Despite having 215 and 235 width tires even. The 92 models only ran 205/50/15s up front (my Civic runs that much rubber now)
Most over rated cars though? GT-R (R32 up) - It is heavy, quick yes, but not as fast as fanboys like to think (R32 to R34) and is so over played its old. Veyron - Just is, period. AE86 - Sorry, I've driven these, setup or not, and they are pretty anticlimatic. Yes, they have a neat vintage-ish appeal, but I can think of a dozen cars that can be had for less that do so many things better, like the Miata, MR2, or for speed, a 92 Civic Si. S13 - See above, though it isn't as bad as an AE86 for the most part. |
||
|
I'm With Coco
|
Remember the obituaries for the NSX as well? I didn't think it would mean much, but it seemed like every major magazine had some big full-page commentary about it at the time. It was sad seeing the car fade away like that, in a mess of underpowered automatic-equipped targa pushovers... But clearly, the car meant a lot to quite a few people.
The good news is that resale values on them are halfway decent, and you can pick up well-kept models easily for $25K. Of course, that assumes that you can even find one for sale. |
||
|
Maaaatt Daaymuuuunh
|
Funny you mention the Beetle (and I assume you're talking about the original Volks Wagen and not the new "Mädchen Wagen"), it's a car which for most of my life I thought was overrated, and more recently have really started to like. The same thing happened with all the classic "peoples' cars" really, the Mini, the 500, the 2CV etc. Their concept becomes more relevant again all the time, just as it was for those cars in the 40s/50s/60s.
|
||
|
Diamond Member
|
The Volkswagen... whose strange, air-cooled flat-four was one of the most widely used engines in grassroots motorsports and kitcar building. (Look up the Formula VW, sometime). Also, like the 13B, its unique, compact design lends itself well to small aircraft use.
The swingaxles and rear-engine made handling a little more exciting than need be, the car was undeniably crude, noisy and unrefined... But the Beetle sold well into the 70's, and, in Brazil, till just a few years ago (wiki'ing... apparently 2003... we had a batch of new ones here back in 2000 brought in by a grey market guy... sold out quickly). This isn't a car loved for any semblance of refinement, sportiness or luxury... it's loved because it's the Beetle... for better or for worse. |
||
|
Fear, Emptiness, Despair
|
The drivers pissing you off means it's over-rated? There may be plenty of douche bags and a**holes behind the wheel, and while most reviews are certainly glowing, I don't think I've ever seen a comparo where it won. It's mostly a bang for the buck argument that earns the car good marks. Good handling, good braking, good acceleration; nothing that's the best. If being over-rated is driver dependent, than I'm not sure there is a car that ISN'T over-rated.
|
||
|
I'm With Coco
|
RE: The Kafer (ie, Beetle)
I wouldn't call it overrated whatsoever. Considering how meticulously it had been designed by Ferdinand Porsche (it had been an idea of his dating back to the 1920s), and the almost absurd development process that was involved to make it not only an incredibly dependable car, but also one that had parts that were easily interchangeable, it was pretty much a revolution in automotive engineering and design. I still think that the Volkswagen was partially responsible for the re-industrialization of Germany both inter-war and post-war, it really being an unanticipated success under both circumstances (despite it being a money raising scheme for the Nazis for some time). Just looking at the effects that the car has had on the world culturally, its absolutely amazing. Then you look at the impact on industry (as homeforsummer pointed out...), spurring the creation of the 500, Mini, 2CV, among others, it is really rather amazing what came of it. I still think the Type-I is one of the pinnacle achievements in automotive engineering, and in no way, shape or form should it ever be called "overrated." Ever. |
||
| Hot Topics |
|
Lamborghini Reventon uncovered?
Micdog49
|
|
Reverse Lights!
Stonemonkey
|
|
Show off your latest purchase!
McLaren
|
|
Does "Freedom" exist nowadays?
CarBastard
|
|
The Weather Thread
dbartucci
|
|
California Station Fire
Danoff
|
|
ps3 heat
Zarathustra
|
|
Sound In GT5
Marry_Me_GT
|
| More On GTPlanet |
|
- Gran Turismo 5 - GT5 Prologue - Gran Turismo 4 - Online Racing - Gaming - Automotive - Motorsport - Multimedia - Off-Topic! News Feeds Subscribe to GTPlanet's news feed for the latest headlines from the world of Gran Turismo! |