Mitsubishi HSR-II '89

MidFieldMaven

MidFieldMaven

3,417
United States
NJ
Rave2Grave
Anybody else think this is the best concept car in the game? It's not the fastest, but to me there's something really awesome about it. It has 6 moving parts that help to control pitch, roll, and yaw much like an airplane. It's got 4WD and a 3.0L turbo V6 just like the 3000GT/GTO.

344 hp / 7,000 rpm
325 ft-lb / 2,500 rpm
1,200 kg
489 pp

I took a completely stock HSR-II to Suzuka Circuit and it's capable of running 2:21 all day long, maybe 2:20 with a wheel.

That's as quick as the Subaru Impreza Sedan WRX STi '10. Not bad for a 25 year old car.

 
Sorry for the question, but can you test the HSR in Cape Ring Interior with 500PP? I bought the 2J today, so my money is over. If its possible or not, thanks anyway. My friends and I race at night in this track, a fast car is always welcome!!
 
How does this lap time compare to other 489pp cars? And in addition, what PP were cars which ran similar lap times at Suzuka?

Thanks.
 
The Tesla Model S is the only other car in GT6 that has 489 pp in the dealerships, but was 4.5 seconds slower around Suzuka with a time of 2:26.218

Cars with a time between 2:21.0 and 2:22.0 range in PP from 449 (Spoon S2000) to 512 (Jaguar XKR)

All my tests are done on SH tires, no oil changes or any other mods.

2002 Caterham Seven Fireblade
2001 BMW Z8
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII RS
2008 BMW Z4 M Coupe
2000 Spoon S2000
1994 TVR Griffith 500
2004 Subaru Impreza Sedan WRX STi Spec C (Type-II)
2010 Subaru Impreza Sedan WRX STI
2002 Mazda RX-7 Spirit R Type A (FD)
2010 Jaguar XKR Coupe
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR GSR
2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI RS T.M. Edition
2008 Maserati GranTurismo S
2003 Trial Celica SS-II (ZZT231)
 
SuzukaStar
Cars with a time between 2:21.0 and 2:22.0 range in PP from 449 (Spoon S2000) to 512 (Jaguar XKR)

All my tests are done on SH tires, no oil changes or any other mods.

2002 Caterham Seven Fireblade 567pp / 4.01
2001 BMW Z8 492pp / 3.48
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII RS 485pp / 3.43
2008 BMW Z4 M Coupe 476pp / 3.36
2000 Spoon S2000 456pp / 3.22
1994 TVR Griffith 500 502pp / 3.55
2004 Subaru Impreza Sedan WRX STi Spec C (Type-II) 478pp / 3.38
2010 Subaru Impreza Sedan WRX STI 472pp / 3.34
2002 Mazda RX-7 Spirit R Type A (FD) 473pp / 3.34
2010 Jaguar XKR Coupe 519pp / 3.67
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR GSR 482pp / 3.41
2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI RS T.M. Edition 479pp / 3.39
2008 Maserati GranTurismo S 496pp / 3.51
2003 Trial Celica SS-II (ZZT231) 467pp / 3.30
Click to expand...

I have added the PP values for each car in red (my numbers include the oil change, so take away about 7PP for each). I don't have your exact lap times, but if I just use the median of 2:21.5 lap time, we can compare the PP value to the lap time.

The number in blue next to each car is the amount of performance points needed over time (PP / lap time in seconds) which demonstrates the value relative to the car's placement in the PP scale. The lower the blue number, the better.

Based on this, the best value picks from this list (at Suzuka) would be the Spoon S2000 and Trial Celica which run about 2:21.5 lap times using less than 3.30 performance points per second of a lap.
 

Latest Posts

Back