- 481
- Minne-snow-ta
- Nukedogger86
- nukedogger
I've had the curiosity for sometime about how the different tires wear out in comparison. So I devised a fairly controlled experiment.
Vehicle used - Shelby gt500 Mustang - full tuned
Track - Streets of Willow (for the skid pad)
Online Lobby set initially to normal tire wear and then to the fastest setting.
The test:
Out of the pits I would slow down gently to a crawl and make a U-turn and head to the skid pad at a slow pace. I would then stop at the skid pad, put it in 2nd gear and hold the gas and brake at 100%, wait for the lap timer to strike 1:00. At which point I would release the brakes with the wheel cranked to the left and once the motor reved back to redline I would shift to 3rd gear. Once the first tire (Right side rear) hit a 0 (zero) I would check the time.
The results:
On normal tire wear two runs were made with Race Softs and both yielded 1:40 or 100 seconds.
On the fastest, two runs were also made with Race Softs and both yielded 28 seconds.
Here is the quick chart. Tire type - time in seconds on fastest setting
RS - 28
RM - 34
RH - 50
SS - 48
SM - 62
SH - 94
CS - 114
CM - 142
CH - 184
Now to convert the accelerated wear to normal we use some basic math.
if 100/28 = 3.571428571428571, and round to nearest whole number we get something like:
RS - 100 (1:40)
RM - 121 (2:01)
RH - 180 (3:00)
SS - 171 (2:51)
SM - 221 (3:41)
SH - 336 (5:36)
CS - 407 (6:47)
CM - 507 (8:27)
CH - 657 (10:57)
There you have it folks, a comparison of how the tires stack up according to wear.
* This experiment was far from perfect, but gives a general idea.*
Vehicle used - Shelby gt500 Mustang - full tuned
Track - Streets of Willow (for the skid pad)
Online Lobby set initially to normal tire wear and then to the fastest setting.
The test:
Out of the pits I would slow down gently to a crawl and make a U-turn and head to the skid pad at a slow pace. I would then stop at the skid pad, put it in 2nd gear and hold the gas and brake at 100%, wait for the lap timer to strike 1:00. At which point I would release the brakes with the wheel cranked to the left and once the motor reved back to redline I would shift to 3rd gear. Once the first tire (Right side rear) hit a 0 (zero) I would check the time.
The results:
On normal tire wear two runs were made with Race Softs and both yielded 1:40 or 100 seconds.
On the fastest, two runs were also made with Race Softs and both yielded 28 seconds.
Here is the quick chart. Tire type - time in seconds on fastest setting
RS - 28
RM - 34
RH - 50
SS - 48
SM - 62
SH - 94
CS - 114
CM - 142
CH - 184
Now to convert the accelerated wear to normal we use some basic math.
if 100/28 = 3.571428571428571, and round to nearest whole number we get something like:
RS - 100 (1:40)
RM - 121 (2:01)
RH - 180 (3:00)
SS - 171 (2:51)
SM - 221 (3:41)
SH - 336 (5:36)
CS - 407 (6:47)
CM - 507 (8:27)
CH - 657 (10:57)
There you have it folks, a comparison of how the tires stack up according to wear.
* This experiment was far from perfect, but gives a general idea.*