goixoye
1) It doesn't make sense to me the SS Camaro has more initial HP and less initial wt (than the Z28) but your giving it more money for non-HP upgrades? I suppose your testing has indicated that the Z28 is the superior car so more money was needed for the SS.
All I can say regarding the cars is that I initially gave all of them enough money to obtain HP upgrades to get them all within a very close power-to-weight ratio.
Jump_Ace and I then took all of the modified cars onto 2 different tracks and drove them until we got consistent times (Jump is capable of turning in regular, consistent times, which I felt was absoluetly essential for testing).
Two or three cars, despite having the same pwr/weight ratio were way ahead of the pack and 2 or 3 cars were way behind the pack. The Shelby was 1 or 2 seconds ahead and the Plymouth Cuda was waaaaay behind (shame that, sexy looking car).
We reduced the HP on the lead cars and increased it for the trailing ones, retesting several times with different combinations until the entire pack was running within a .7 spread.
Because this was done with 2 different drivers and 3 different tracks, I'm fairly happy that the cars are pretty evenly balanced, but this isn't to say that some of them will be harder or easier to drive for other drivers and you may get widely different results.
All I can say is grab the car that works for YOU.
goixoye
2) Now let me preface this by saying I'm new to GTP and GTP competitions so I'm learning the ropes. My intention here is not to offend or make waves so please don't get your hackles up and your claws out.... Are you, as the administrator of this competetion, actually going to participate? If so, the caveat (sp?) relative to future non-HP money seems a bit unfair. It seems a bit like a conflict of interests. You may already have decided how you are going to distribute that extra money...will it be the same amount for all cars? After 4 weeks will the lower finishing cars be awarded more money? Will specific individuals (instead of the cars) be allowed more money? If I know now it may impact my car choice for the competition. The track order, which you may or may not have determined, could also have some effect on this ex: if the "speed" tracks were first in the series and the "handling" tracks were last I would choose a car (and upgrades) accordingly knowing there was more "handling" (aka non-HP) money coming. If you, as a competing administrator know these things it seems like it gives you an unfair advantage. If you as a non-competing administrator know and none of the competitors know I guess it really doesn't matter.
If you are going to compete we should all know the full rules in advance and make our decisions based on that information.
Even if you yourself haven't actually decided how the additional money will be structured and you are competing then someone outside the competion should make that call.
Maybe there shouldn't be any mid-stream changes.
This point is extremely valid and I really appreciate it being brought up.
A lot of you don't know me, but I'm extremely honest - to a fault. Yes, theoretically I could use the knowledge of what is to come to my advantage, and I remember being similarly concerned in this regard in other tournaments.
I'm going to *REMOVE* the mid-season cash influx and list the tracks in order, not so much to even the playing field and keep things fair (although this is a very valid point), but to increase the strategy involved with car selection.
I'd like to suggest a mid-season car swap as an option and I would like feedback on this.
goixoye
3) It seems that the Shelby is unfairly handicapped. It's a great car and I want to use it but I've already found 2 better cars and I may try, and find, a few more. With the promise of additional non-HP money the gap is going to increase. The Shelby needs more HP. It's limited by power not handling. I can't even drive one of the "better" cars without the ASM & TCS and it's still quicker than the Shelby. It's currently got power that I can't put onto the pavement and needs some chasis adjustments. With a better set of tires and and other tweaks I may be able to turn off the driving aids and then the Shelby will look like it doesn't belong in the competition. Actually, if the Shelby got additional non-HP money and this other "better" car didn't get any the Shelby might be the better car. So maybe the Shelby isn't completely limited by HP.
I'm naturally very concerned with the balancing of the cars [see notes above], but both Jump_Ace and I had the Shelby well ahead of the pack by 1 or 2 seconds (it was a whopping 3 or 5 seconds ahead of the 'Cuda and ran just as fast even when the 'Cuda had over 600HP!)
If she doesn't work for you, I'm sorry, but even with the reduced HP upgrades, the Shelby came in 2nd during testing in both of our hands.
The above comments were sent to me via PM by goixoye, but I thought he raised some very valid points and I wanted to answer them publicly so that they'd serve as a FAQ and also notification that I was going to alter the rules slightly (no mid-season cash influx and a pre-determined race track list).
I highly encourage people to send me input and comments ... I will always receive them well, answer them where I can and incorporate your ideas where they add to the series!
~ Natalya