The Third Sign of the Apocalypse: Brad Drives a "Toyota" and Likes It

  • Thread starter Thread starter YSSMAN
  • 32 comments
  • 2,599 views

YSSMAN

Super-Cool Since 2013
Premium
Messages
21,286
United States
GR-MI-USA
Messages
YSSMAN
Messages
YSSMAN
No, you didn't read the title wrong. Although, the "Toyota" part is a bit misleading. Technically, its a Scion, and technically technically its a Dihatsu. Its called the Scion xD, and truthfully, I didn't think it was too bad.




I spent the day today driving around looking at various cars simply because I wanted to enjoy the weather and get the car bug out of my system before school starts. I started on one end of 28th Street, and went through the main part of what I'd call the "dealer district," and eventually ended the day at Toyota.

I've been looking at Scions since they first hit the streets a few years back. The staged launch put their arrival in Grand Rapids further back than say Chicago, but nevertheless they had arrived, and I was a bit disappointed. The previous models were decent, don't get me wrong, but they weren't what I was hoping for. As dressed-up Toyota Ecos built by Dihatsu, they were only marginally cool vehicles. The xB took off, the xA floundered a bit.

This Scion xD replaces the xA in the US, and is based on the Toyota Yaris. My salesman (he calls himself "Spider Man," go figure...) said it was based on the Corolla, but that doesn't matter. Based on the smaller chassis with the smaller engine out of the Corolla (that he did get right), it came off as a package far more attractive than the xB that preceded it. The fuel mileage seemed right, and the price wasn't too bad... Just shy of $16K without any options.

So, driving it. It was a very short drive. I drove a basic model with a stick, in white, with hubcaps. The cars don't have radios installed when they arrive at the dealer, in case you upgrade them (which I find silly), so I didn't get to test the stereo system. The overall look of the interior is quite nice, particularly compared to the xA before it. Its clean, pretty efficient, and feels pretty nice by comparison to say a Yaris or a Camry.

tmc_08scionxd_dash.jpg

I really liked the steering wheel and the instrument panel, as it was pretty easy to read, however the overall layout of the speedo/tach was a bit off... Given that they reside in the same unit. Not having the speedo/tach in the center was a good choice, and automatically put the new xD leagues ahead of the xB right there... Not to mention the xD felt more expensive and all together a bit more "quality-oriented" than the xB. The seats were quite comfortable, had a fair bit of adjustment, and it looked as though there was plenty of room in the quite comfortable rear seats as well.

But then I reached the first issue, the seating position felt all wrong. You felt like you were sitting up too high and too far forward to get any kind of setup "right." Granted, given a few extra minutes with the car, I probably could have had it sorted out easily. So that one will be neither negative or positive I guess. Outward visibility was good in the front, but looking anywhere outside of the front windows was difficult. I'd have to get used to the rear-tint, but look out the hatch, you've got something the size of a mail-box to look through... Negative points there. The glass could have been a bit bigger I think, even adding a few inches in height would help a lot.

Okay, so the drive... Well, I got right in, got myself situated as best as possible, and tried to start it up. Nothing happened. There were only six miles on the car, so I was thinking "What the hell?" in my head. I turned to the guy and asked "Does it have to be in reverse to start?" He said no, told me to put the clutch all the way down (it already was...) and then try to turn it over again. It fired up, and it was quiet. If I wasn't paying attention, I wouldn't have heard (or felt) it. I put the gear selector in gear, something that felt a little vague for me, and proceeded to take off. I over-revved it, and let the clutch out slowly... Very different from the Volkswagens, Porsches, and Corvettes that I'm used to. The clutch was really light on the uptake, which was nice, but the throttle was a bit too touchy. I'm sure that with time I'd get used to it, but it was awkward.

I was quite surprised by how quick the engine spooled up, and the shifts to match it were quite quick (it felt like a short-throw shifter), but really didn't feel as "direct" as it does in my Vee-Dub. I never missed a gear, but I was always worried about if I was actually in gear. It was rubbery to say the least, but that could be fixed easily. Shifting through the gears, its easy to appreciate the little amount of effort required, particularly if this is to be a city car. But I took it through a twisty neighborhood road, and I got to the second major issue.

It just wasn't that exciting to drive. The gear selector was rubbery, the wheel was a bit vague (electric steering), and while the ride was nice, I think it isolated a few too many things to appeal to me. If I were a bit older, and maybe cared a little less about performance driving, it would probably be perfect. The steering was a bit too light at speed, and you felt as though it was darting around, but given how short of a ride it was, that may change as the trip gets longer.

So overall, how was it?

The Scion xD comes off as a car that I can appreciate, and would consider buying at the right price. Just shy of $16K without any options seems a bit high for a car that size, but there are enough standard features to make it seem worth it. The problem is, against the VW Rabbit and the upcoming Saturn Astra, I'm a bit skeptical. I'm going to have to drive the Saturn to get a good comparison in price and performance, but the xD came off as a pretty reasonable option to the best-in-class Rabbit. The same options of the VW would push the price to nearly the same area as the Scion, but would come with alloy wheels, a bit nicer of an interior, and that quirky VW driving style that I love so much.

I'd call the xD a fair deal, and I think a lot of other people will too. Overall I'd have to give it an 8/10, a good value for those who aren't necessarily looking for the performance options, but not something that will get the Rabbit and Mazda3 folks excited.
 
Yuck. I hate the "x" Scions, they are the ugliest things in America right now. Even the Honda Element is better looking and better to drive (albeit marginally). There are much better vehicles to use $16,000 USD on, one of which is a Corolla--if you want to talk about Toyotas. I'd rather drive a Cobalt or Ion than the xA, xB, or this xD.
 
God damn, looks like the ugly bastard child of a pug that had sex with a toaster.......
 
I would rather take a Corolla LE or S for a couple bucks more.

The exterior of the xD looks pretty OK, but the interior seems pretty boring.
 
Sweet mother of pearl that thing is ugly. At least Aztek drivers can make fun of something now.
 
Well, it isn't pretty, but it isn't nearly as horrid as the new xB either...



The photo doesn't show it well, but you can easily run your thumb through the gap between the hood and the "grille." Its very odd indeed...

If you can overlook the odd front-end (I'd say the rest of the car is okay), its not too bad. I think my biggest problems are the way that they make you option it out, buy your warranty off a list of options, and otherwise don't really make a convincing case to buy it other than "Hey, its a Toyota!"

Side note: I think he was upset when I called them both Dihatus, like I wasn't supposed to know or something...
 
So your post indicates that you didn't like driving the car, yet the title says you liked it.:confused: I am little skeptical of this one. You comment on how you don't like certain parts about the car, yet say those aspects would be nice.

I'm still convinced that the X-series Scions suck. There are cars in that market that i would much rather have, and I wouldn't be ashamed to drive.

"If you overlook the bad stuff, it really is a decent car..."
 
Well, it wasn't the hellbox-on-wheels that I had thought it to be, so its bumped up a bit higher on the like/not like list. I didn't think it was too bad, but as I noted in the "review," it isn't for folks who prefer a lot of involvement in their drive.

...I think this one would be right up Doug's alley with a slushbox...

(kidding!)
 
Hey, did the ignition keyhole have three postitions and a button on the side to turn it? and was it silver?

I sat in an '07 xB AND xA at the auto show, and they had the same tumbler my '88 Nova has. that's 19 years, the same keys. I wonder if they went for 20.
 
Yeah it did, and it really was annoying. I'm used to having two positions in my car, on and off... Having to go from the lowest one, to the one that turns all the electronics on, and then on to the ignition was just silly... I must have blocked it out with the Camry.

There were a lot of little things about the car that I really didn't notice until I got back in my Jetta and drove home. Half of the instrument panel was covered in places to light-up with warning lights, which is odd for a Toyota. It felt kinda "dark" on the interior too... Granted it did have a black/gray interior, but the light really didn't shine in like it does in my car.

Its still not a bad car, and I could live with it. But if I'm spending a large sum of my own money, I'd rather not buy the Toyota.
 
I Can't believe it. They're still using the same ignition switch my 1988 model car has. That's 20 years, now. More, actually, since the AE8X cars were introduced in, what, '83?

Geez louise.

the '07s seemed a little dark to me, too. I think the xB had "Minivan tint" in the rear windows, and that, combined with fairly small windows and a black headliner (the one on my Nova's Gray...and falling out, but that's beside the point...) makes Scion's interiors seem pretty dark.
 
The odd thing was that being as "spacious" as they look from the outside, I didn't feel as though I had much headroom over my Jetta. The Vee-Dub just feels so "open" compared to it, and I'm not sure why.
 
I Can't believe it. They're still using the same ignition switch my 1988 model car has. That's 20 years, now. More, actually, since the AE8X cars were introduced in, what, '83?

My brother said that the moonroof controls on my dad's new Corolla are the same as the ones on his '90 Celica. But hey, it's all about character. :dunce:
 
...I think this one would be right up Doug's alley with a slushbox...

(kidding!)

The transmission went out on our (the rental company's) 2008 Saturn Vue XE 3.5 two days ago. The vehicle had 2,100 miles and stalled on me in the middle of the road. Let this not be a forebearer of things to come for your beloved General!
 
The odd thing was that being as "spacious" as they look from the outside, I didn't feel as though I had much headroom over my Jetta. The Vee-Dub just feels so "open" compared to it, and I'm not sure why.
Which is why the redesigned xB and the new xD are the single worst redesigns I can think of in recent memory. Having driven an original xB, I can tell you it was slow, boring and slow. But damned if that wasn't a marvel of packaging. I loved it. The new xB is trash for that exact reason. Its like Toyota totally missed the point with the car. Swing and a miss. And the panel gaps! Its hilarious.
And the xD? Just buy a Corolla. If the Yaris wasn't so ugly and poorly put together, I would hvae suggested that, but as it stands...buy a Corolla.
 
We're all gonna die! RUN! :scared:

I guess maybe I shouldn't talk because I actually wouldn't mind the new (and old) Tribeca as well as the new Saturn VUE. :grumpy:
 
The xD replaced the xA. Despite being based in the same segment. And based on the same car in Japan. Its very confusing.

The Japanese have a weird way of modelling these cars, then. :dunce: It's still ugly as sin.

EDIT* I wonder how much wiser it'd be to buy a base Cooper with zero options than to "trick out" one of these.
 
The transmission went out on our (the rental company's) 2008 Saturn Vue XE 3.5 two days ago. The vehicle had 2,100 miles and stalled on me in the middle of the road. Let this not be a forebearer of things to come for your beloved General!

Question: Do you know how they were using the transmission? I was talking to a friend of mine at the Saturn dealer not too long after the Aura XR 3.6 (with the same transmission) showed up and he said that one of the mechanics blew out a transmission after using the manual mode, assuming it would shift out of gear (thinking it was smarter than the driver) if he over-revved it. It didn't. And it lost forward movement in the turn lane in front of the dealer.

Overall, I do not know of the overall reliability of the 6T70E/6L80E, but given that they're going to be showing up in everything from Saturns and Fords up to Cadillacs and BMWs (BMW buys them for use in the smaller vehicles, I believe the 3/X3 and 5/X5 uses them, but the 7 uses a ZF box), I would assume they are isolated cases. If it was an extremely common problem, I would have heard of it on GMI by now... But given the transmission's basis on the 4L80E, I'd expect it to take a pretty outstanding amount of abuse before giving out.

...But, Ford did do some design work on it... So I can't guarantee anything...

*McLaren*
EDIT* I wonder how much wiser it'd be to buy a base Cooper with zero options than to "trick out" one of these.

Its a very good question. When I mentioned to the salesman that I was looking at the VW Rabbit and waiting for the Saturn Astra, he seemed a bit put-off after that. His argument was that you aren't going to get the same amount of standard features, but if I'm not mistaken, the VW comes with more out of the box... I have no idea with the Saturn though.

According to what I can see on the "base" MINI, you start off at about $2000 more than the xD, get a better suspension from the start, ooodles more driving involvement, and better fuel economy. I'd even fair a guess that the MINI would hold its value far-longer than the Scion as well...

I'd say the extra $2000 is worth it.
 
According to what I can see on the "base" MINI, you start off at about $2000 more than the xD, get a better suspension from the start, ooodles more driving involvement, and better fuel economy. I'd even fair a guess that the MINI would hold its value far-longer than the Scion as well...

The Scion will NEVER hold its value. Drive it off the lot and you already lost $1000. The Mini will not only keep its value but might INCREASE in value after the first year. I've seen it happen.
 
Guh, I must be the only person on the planet (GTPlanet that is) that actually likes the look of the Yaris an X series Scions.

Anyhow, I am basically jumping into the frying vat by trying to defend a Scion in this thread, seeing the current sentiments and posts.

On the ignition matter, I actually like having Off, Acc, On, Ignition... versus the Off, On, Ignition deal. And its how just about every Japanese car I can think of does it. Same with the Lights on the turn signal stalk (Which I have seen you complain about Brad) versus the dash area knob (how the American's do it). Its just easier to remember there I feel.

Most people don't give a crap about the handling of a car, more so with kids. The ones that want "performance" are just gonna get springs or cut them, and the rest primarily are just gonna drive it. The cars will still last forever, mechanically anyhow.

Brad, we've talked this before, but it bears repeating, as most other people seem to have similar sentiments. Everyone seems to care more on initial quality than the stuff under neath. And everyone always says "VW does it better, and for about the same price" but VW has like the worst reliability, ever.

I'll try to get up to a dealership to drive these latest "abominations," but I'm sure my opinion will be off from always driving Toyotas. Bleh.
 
The MKIV models were not particularly well-known for their reliability, but I can guarantee you that its 110% different with the MKV models. Some of the MKIV models were nightmares for some people, and other times the cars were completely problem free...

...The problem here is that people who don't know what they're getting into buy a VW thinking that nothing will happen, and much to their surprise, its the little things that shake-out. What the difference here is that the Subaru/Volkswagen types are quite a bit more tolerable of the "little things" that go wrong compared to the Toyota/Honda types who won't have it at all. When you buy a Volkswagen, you need to be aware that things will probably go wrong at some point, and you're an idiot if you don't...

Personally speaking, I'm willing to take the risk for the benefit of my overall driving experience. This Toyota was supposed to be "youthful" in appearance and attitude, but seemed as though it would appeal more to a 40-year old than someone who is in their 20s. Granted, some people care, others don't, but when Scion tries to come off as this "Import/Tuner" brand... Well, they probably should bake a bit in from the start.

For the record: The MKV Golf/Jetta has had very few documented issues that I know of, most being on European models with engines we do not receive here. I've heard of issues with the electric steering (talk to FoolKiller) and complaints about fuel mileage (depends on the person), and other nit-picks that likely depend on what you're looking for in a car. The same can be said for the Jetta, as I've yet to hear of any major failures.

...I dunno...

Your car is supposed to say something about you, am I not correct? These Scions are kinda like wearing this emo/punk stuff and listening to John Mayer. It suggest something about the driver that isn't necessarily apparent, and I don't really like that. Maybe I've been driving Volkswagens too long, maybe I've become a brand-snob, but the whole VW-expirience is something unlike anything out there... It doesn't put out an overly positive or negative message, but most importantly makes the driver feel important when you're behind the wheel.

When I drive VWs, they talk back. They let you know whats going on. The Toyota really didn't, it just went and didn't ask questions. I don't like that. It was too quiet, too soft, and just felt like a blind date that wasn't all that interested in you...
 
I Can't believe it. They're still using the same ignition switch my 1988 model car has. That's 20 years, now. More, actually, since the AE8X cars were introduced in, what, '83?
They're probably older than that. On the other hand, if it still works, why replace it? I've never driven a Toyota that required you to press a button to remove the keys, maybe the really old ones re-badged for US nameplates did. Even Dodge finally cut that crap out.

Then again, I've never driven any car (except for push-putton start) that had only a 2-step, on/off ignition. Either that, or I never noticed.

Which sucks for one of the buyers, doesn't it? What's the point of buying a car for the sole reason it's resale value is going to be better than another car. The only way a car actually gains value is if you give a desirable old car a full restoration from a junkyard-state, it appeared in movie and driven by a famous actor, or it has a racing pedigree (local quarter-mile track doesn't count). That, or it's a Supra.
 
Which sucks for one of the buyers, doesn't it? What's the point of buying a car for the sole reason it's resale value is going to be better than another car. The only way a car actually gains value is if you give a desirable old car a full restoration from a junkyard-state, it appeared in movie and driven by a famous actor, or it has a racing pedigree (local quarter-mile track doesn't count). That, or it's a Supra.
I don't understand your point. A car that loses half of its resale value in a year compared to a car that loses 1/10th of its resale value in a year. And the Mini is obviously a better car to begin with on many levels. So what's all this about a guy buying a car purely for resale value?
 
They're probably older than that. On the other hand, if it still works, why replace it? I've never driven a Toyota that required you to press a button to remove the keys, maybe the really old ones re-badged for US nameplates did. Even Dodge finally cut that crap out.

Then again, I've never driven any car (except for push-putton start) that had only a 2-step, on/off ignition. Either that, or I never noticed.

Actually, you press the button to go past "Off," and then, If I remember correctly (I've got it down to a reflexive motion, now) to turn it back to "Off." the key turns through "ACC" Like said before, then past "ON" to Start, which I think is unmarked.

I'll have to pay attention to how I start it tonight.
 
I don't understand your point. A car that loses half of its resale value in a year compared to a car that loses 1/10th of its resale value in a year. And the Mini is obviously a better car to begin with on many levels. So what's all this about a guy buying a car purely for resale value?

So it looks like if you buy a year or two old Scion, you can get a cheap, decent, and reliable form of transportation.

Also, I didn't know Minis started out so relatively cheap.
 

Latest Posts

Back