GTP Cool Wall: Renault Espace F1

  • Thread starter BKGlover
  • 64 comments
  • 5,412 views

Renault Espace F1

  • Total voters
    104
  • Poll closed .
BKGlover

BKGlover

6,098
United States
Texas
Renault Espace F1 nominated by rallymorten

espace-f1-2.jpg


Stats that Matter:
Status: Concept
Built: 2 known (1995)
Style: 5-Door MPV
Engine: Renault RS5 V10 (800 HP)
Transmission: 6-Speed Semi-Automatic
Layout: Mid-engine, Rear-drive
Note: Essentially a Williams F1 car wearing an Espace shell.

My Take: Leave it to the French, Matra specifically, to think of something like this, then do it properly. They took a lot of stuff off the Williams, the FW15C to be specific, and put it all in something that might look like an Espace maybe from a distance. Even so, it only balances out the big thing, it's still a minivan. Vans can be cool, MPVs can be cool, but minivans cannot be cool. All in all, I give it a meh.

Wikipedia Espace page


Nomination Thread​
 
Last edited:
Sub Zero. One of the two people carriers/vans you want to drive in anger, the other being the XJ220/Transit mule.
 
Uncool. Williams took an Espace and made it completely unusable for road use. It's completely pointless to have a hyper-MPV that isn't road legal. Being basically an F1 car underneath doesn't do it justice.
 
Would be sub-zero except its sorta pointless. But to have a minivan that's an F1 car underneath is just so unique that it's cool to me.
 


How can a screaming minivan that looks like it's moving in fast forward be anything other than Sub Zero? I mean, it does 0-60 in LESS THAN 3 seconds! And it was our first taste of how driving an F1 feels like in Gran Turismo 2. I'd like to see this go up Pikes Peak and have a go at Loeb's record someday :D
 
AudiMan2011
Uncool. Williams took an Espace and made it completely unusable for road use. It's completely pointless to have a hyper-MPV that isn't road legal. Being basically an F1 car underneath doesn't do it justice.
Click to expand...

Thats the whole point, a unique vehicle that is supposed to defy sense-make. (Yes, thats a word. I invented it.)
 
There are only two cars as insane as this which I can think of. The Ford Nucleon and the Toyota TS020. The Ford Nucleon was so stupid and pointless that it didn't actually exist. Thus the Ford Nucleon was as seriously uncool as it gets. The Toyota TS020, on the otherhand, was a highly effective racing car (that never won a race for all manner of reasons, mainly tyres) which could theoretically also be driven by anyone with a drivers licence on the road. This wouldn't normally be cool, but the insanity of the TS020 combines with this to make it cool. This falls half way inbetween those two cars, but the Nucleon was so, so, seriously uncool that this is still seriously uncool.
 
Roger the Horse
There are only two cars as insane as this which I can think of. The Ford Nucleon and the Toyota TS020.
Click to expand...

The Ford Transit shell they mated to an XJ220 engine is pretty whack, too.
 
A Renault Espace, stuffed with Formula One parts and technology, built for the sake of such a thing existing is cool.
The facts that it was built by three Formula One manufacturers, tested by Alain Prost and makes that noise makes it Sub Zero for me.
 
I have to say, this is one of the craziest concepts to date. Your average minivan paired with an F1 engine. Admitted, you very rarely see a cool minivan, but this one can give a Bugatti Veyron a run for it's money. Personally, I'll give it a Sub-Zero for the craziness of it, and the imaginations of peoples faces if you could say to them "I'm driving a minivan.. Renault Espace F1"
 
Seriously Uncool, as it is pretty much "polishing a turd" taken to the extreme. It is still a Renault Espace in name and shape, and it looks like an absolute mess.

Not even going to mention the as yet unforeseen amounts of pointlessness attached to it.
 
It's an Espace on steroids. Built with the best F1 technology around at the time and made it insanely fast. I only drove it once in GT2 and it was incredible. I vote cool.
 
*rolls his eyes at ANOTHER race car, only this time it's one that doesn't even race*
 
TheCracker
*rolls his eyes at ANOTHER race car, only this time it's one that doesn't even race*
Click to expand...
This.

The cool wall concept is being broken by all these race cars. Just the same as race cars cannot get their times on the power board, race cars cannot go on the cool wall.
 
Went for "cool".

As a car guy, absolutely sub-zero. But if you drove one down the street, with it making a racket and looking like a Halfords special, people would think you're a berk. So it's relegated to merely cool.
 
daan
This.

The cool wall concept is being broken by all these race cars. Just the same as race cars cannot get their times on the power board, race cars cannot go on the cool wall.
Click to expand...

It's not even a cool wall anyway, it's a like wall, so it's not like having race cars ruins it anymore. I'm not sure how anyone can vote cars like this cool since they are pointless. :indiff:
 
ASH32
It's not even a cool wall anyway, it's a like wall, so it's not like having race cars ruins it anymore. I'm not sure how anyone can vote cars like this cool since they are pointless. :indiff:
Click to expand...

Oh yeah! It isn't a cool wall. That title of "GTP Cool Wall" and the fact that it's clearly based off the Top Gear cool wall makes it a "like wall", not a cool wall!

Oh wait.

I would definitely argue that it's more than a like wall. I love this car but didn't vote it subzero because it's pointless and that isn't exactly cool.
 
ASH32
It's not even a cool wall anyway, it's a like wall, so it's not like having race cars ruins it anymore. I'm not sure how anyone can vote cars like this cool since they are pointless. :indiff:
Click to expand...

Alternatively, some people are taking what's meant to be a bit of fun far too seriously...

Even if I do agree with you on the "like" wall thing. But I've got bored of explaining that bit so from here on in I'm just gonna vote on stuff regardless of how daft it is.
 
Yeah, I don't really get how this cool wall thing works. Is it what I think is cool or what I think someone else will think is cool? I've read having to explain to someone why it's cool means it's uncool. I kinda get the logic behind that but at the same time it makes me not even interested in participating.
 
casey_2005
Yeah, I don't really get how this cool wall thing works. Is it what I think is cool or what I think someone else will think is cool? I've read having to explain to someone why it's cool means it's uncool. I kinda get the logic behind that but at the same time it makes me not even interested in participating.
Click to expand...

The only real explanation needed is that good cars aren't necessarily always cool, and bad cars aren't necessarily always uncool. Trouble then arises if people don't disassociate their fondness for a particular car from its coolness.

I tend to vote mostly on whether I think a car is cool or not, and then add or deduct points depending on whether Average Joe on the street might think I'm cool or a bit of a knob for driving it. If you think a car is cool but the world hates you for driving it, it probably isn't as cool as you'd think.

Hence my Espace vote above. I think it's cool (rare, F1 engineering, completely barmy etc), but if you drove it down the street people not into cars would wonder why you'd painted an MPV gold and put a fart cannon on it...
 
I vote on whether or not I think the car is cool, and like hfs, add or subtract points based on how others might see it.

With that said I find the Espace F1 to be cool. F1 on its own is seriously uncool and minivans on their own are seriously uncool too, but put them both together and it sort of works in a weird Frankenstein sort of a way. Plus it's a vehicle that was built for the sake of answering a question no one asked, and at times that can be cool.
 

Latest Posts

Back