BMW 1-series RWD drives like FWD

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eddy5
  • 6 comments
  • 1,197 views
Messages
38
Er, one question about the GT4 BMW 1-Series Virtual Drive Demo, why does the 1-series handle like a FWD car (Lift off over steer, power on understeer), surely this is all wrong especially on a demo specific for the car. BMW are pushing very hard that the 1-series is RWD so why does the game feel wrong (I've not actually driven a real 1-series but from what I've read it doesn't handle like this).
 
My only guess is incomplete physics engine. That or tehy messed up big time. But I expect it will be fixed by the full release.
 
Truth be told, that's how the car handles. For starters, the traction control can't be switched off. Secondly, even though it is rear-wheel-drive, it still understeers because that is simply just safer and easier to control than oversteer and let's be honest, suburban mums taking the kiddies to school will no doubt be able to cope with understeer easier than with oversteer in emergency situations. The 1-series might be rear drive, but it still needs a massive amount of provocation to slide, indeed from a road test I read, a Ford Focus is much easier to coax into a slide than the 1-series. I went to the launch of the car and a man from BMW told me that although the 1-series is rear-wheel-drive and therefor aimed at enthusiasts more than say, a Volkswagen Golf, one of the main reasons for making it rear-wheel-drive was to keep the BMW tradition and for stability.
 
:)

Yeah I read a test in Autocar recently which said that the 1 series handles more like a fwd than the Focus... Shouldn't be so quick to worry about GT, they know what they are doing!!!

You'll need a lot more power and torque than the 1 currently has to get power oversteer. Wait till they stick some six cylinder power or the high powered M1, then it'll handle more like you'd expect.
 
I have driven a 120d, 120i and 118d IRL and have a copy of 1 series virtual drive, now while it is not possiable to draw a 100% direct comparison between the two (never got my test drive at the 'ring - shame), I can help to answer your questions.

Firstly the vast majority of road cars are set-up with initial under-steer, regardless of the drive type employed. The principal reason is safety, when a car under steers the natural reaction of most drivers is to lift off the throttle, this corrects the understeer and tracks the car back in line. If oversteer was the inital response then a lift off (particularly a rapid one) would result in a spin, FWD cars with lift-off oversteer characteristics actually have this engineered in to increase its effect and generaly gain a reputation for 'edgy' handling (for example the Pug 205 and Clio 172/182); its not a natural FWD characteristic, its a characteristic that results from weight transfer and on most road cars the engineers will work hard to design it out as much as possiable (again for safety reasons).

As I have said above 'lift-off oversteer' is not a FWD characteristic and not a characteristic that most road car designers want in a family car, if it was you would see family cars embeded backwards in hedges at every roundabout.

With regard to power-on oversteer, this is normally only encountered (with the vast majority of road cars) after the inital understeer and only if the car has sufficent power, neither of the 1-series in virtual drive or any of the real production models has the required power.

I'm not sure what road-tests you have been reading, but all the ones I have seen (Top Gear, Evo and Autocar) have all described a car with initial understeer characteristics, insufficent power to break the tail with power on over steer and very mild lift-off oversteer.

With the exception of the slightly exagerated lift-off oversteer I think that the virtual drive set up (with road tyres) is actualy very close to the real thing. Particularly impressive to me is the fact that the 120d has more apparent weight transfer (front to rear) under acceleration and braking than the 120i, due to the heavier diesel engine. This combined with the slightly sharper turn in on the petrol model (again due to the extra weight of the diesel engine), both are very realistic in comparison to the real models.
 
Ah I stand corrected. Thanks for the feedback. I'm sure i'd read somewhere about the 1 being more sort of expected RWD handling, but then I could've imagined it :)
 
Eddy5
Ah I stand corrected. Thanks for the feedback. I'm sure i'd read somewhere about the 1 being more sort of expected RWD handling, but then I could've imagined it :)

No problem, and if no one else has said it. Welcome to GT Planet, have fun.
 
Back