Famine's Car Review: The Renault Clio ('01-'05)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Famine
  • 34 comments
  • 2,488 views

Famine

GTP Editor, GTPEDIA Author
Administrator
Messages
89,446
United Kingdom
Rule 12
Messages
GTP_Famine
Due to "circumstances beyond my control", I recently had the unbridled joy of having to drive an '03 Renault Clio for a weekend.

Looks exactly like this one:
picture.jpg


So, In I get. I've got 500 miles to look forward to in this thing so, what's the driving position like?

Cack. I'm 5'10" tall. I'm in proportion - my legs aren't stupidly long or short. I'm, physically at least, pretty much "normal". I had to have the seat as low as it could go and one notch from as far back as it could go - I've never had to sit this far back in a car before. Saving graces though - this is a Dynamique trim model, meaning the seat WILL adjust up and down (in a facile manner - it all goes up and slightly forward or down and slightly back) and the steering wheel is adjustable for rake (but not reach). There's no lumbar support whatsoever in the seat, so at the end of the first 250 mile journey I was ready to kill anything that crossed my path.

Turn the key and... oh dear. The starter sounds exactly like my old 1.3i Fiesta, which was itself based on a 35-year old engine design. The engine - 1.6i 16v in this model - ticks over okay, if a little clattery. But there's no gasping or straining - the engine starts with little fuss.

Let's have a quick check on the old controls. What the..? Indicator and wiper are the "normal" way round (my Mazda has the indicator on the right and wipers on the left - not normal for the UK). But they're so damn fussy. Turn the end of the indicator stalk round and you've got headlights/sidelights... turn the middle and you've got rear/front and rear foglights... Twiddle the wiper stalk and the rear wiper does something. Push it in and various (scrolling) details about your journey flash up. I'd swear that just to indicate left with your headlights and wipers on you needed to move both stalks through about 7 different dimensions...

This brings me, neatly, onto a subsequent point. In this Clio, the headlights turn on when it's dark (and off again when it isn't) and the wipers turn on when it's wet. This means that whenever my girlfriend drives my car at night and in the rain, she can't see a damn thing, because the car usually does it all for her. What next? Automatic steering when the road bends? Oi! Big car companies! Stop divorcing the driver from actually having to drive.

But I digress. There's also a radio "remote" stalk. Only this is in such a position that you can't see it unless the wheel's at 90 degrees to the right. Niiiice.

Instrument panel... Dreadful. Let's ignore, for a while, the permanent orange glow from the LCD readout (with a temperature gauge, fuel gauge and current option on the computer thingy) - though if I'm looking forward and catch an orange glow on my dashboard, it usually means something's FUBARed, but in the Clio it's normal. Instead, let us move on to the speedometer. There's only two speeds I actually care about - 30mph (for being nice in towns and not getting snapped by cameras) and 70mph on motorways (see the camera comment). The Clio speedo? Goes up in 20s, guv - bearing in mind that this is an adjustment for pretty much only the UK market. There's NO MARKINGS WHATSOEVER for 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110 or (optimistic) 130mph. The speedo DOES go up to 140mph for a 100hp car though. Real useful that, cheers.

Jesus, I haven't even set off yet...

The clutch is like stamping grapes. There's a biting point somewhere, but no-one knows exactly where it is. It probably changes each time. The gearbox is comical - there's no physical way to tell the difference between third and fifth gears other than the noise getting louder in third. On the up side, the 1.6 isn't really sluggish (though for God's sake don't ask it to drive at anything less than 20mph in anything more than third gear) and pings up to its 6500rpm limit quite happily. There's a somewhat staggered approach to the steering. Turning the wheel a little bit doesn't do much, until you reach a certain threshhold amount of turn. Then the wheels snick into their first designated position. Turn the wheel a little more and nothing happens, until you reach another threshhold amount of turn and the wheels snick into the second designated position. You can wiggle the steering wheel from 5 degrees left to 5 degrees right and, other than feeling a slight resistance from the tyres, nothing at all happens. It's almost hilarious. Almost. In town it's as bad. The power steering means that you have to turn the wheel 360 degrees just to turn slightly left. Parking is an activity akin to plate-spinning. Not (stall) forgetting (stall) that (stall) damn (stall) clutch (swears).

The brakes are absolutely the best part of the car. By "best" I mean "worst", obviously. They are purely digital - to fit in with the digital age no doubt. If you aren't pressing them, nothing happens. If you press them a little bit, nothing happens. If you press them a little bit more, they're on. That's it. You've either got ALL of the brakes or none of them.

However, when not braking, steering, indicating or trying to change the radio, it's okay. Well... sort of. In the UK, our maximum speed limit is 70mph. A more realistic "average" maximum (the speed most people settle down into) is 80mph. This means that to pass someone you're gaining on on a motorway requires a little spurt up to 85mph. NO. At 80mph it's okay. Not even that thrashy or loud. At 85mph it's a different world. The car seems to dissociate itself from the tarmac and steering ceases to have any useful function and becomes some kind of wierd Zen T'ai Chi move.

All this rather overwhelms Renault's usual tricks of appalling build quality and fit'n'finish - the sunroof, once opened for the first time, squeaks for the rest of eternity, the interior plastics are a cross between Lego reject quality and the stuff you put in a nuthouse and the glovebox neither closes nor opens properly. This is all kind of unspoken and taken for granted though.


So, to summarise. you can't use this round town because you can't park it without twirling the wheel like a cretin and stalling it. You can't use it on motorways because it takes off. You can't use it on long drives because you'll catch spina bifida. The car turns all the lights and wipers on for you, because French people think you're too thick to do it yourself, yet they couldn't even be bothered to make a glovebox that fits for you. I'll remind you that this is a 1.6i Dynamique model too - very nearly the top of the regular Clio range.

On the upside, it's not totally slow and no-one will want to nick it. Then again, if someone does, you'll never find it, because there's eleventy billion of them that look identical.

And, amusingly, this isn't the worst car I've ever driven...

I got back into my car after 5 days off and threw it down a country lane as a shakedown. I nearly had a "private moment", such was the change.

The verdict? If you're thinking about buying a Renault Clio, get a goddamn bicycle.
 
C'mon Famine. Say what you mean. Did you like it or not?
 
Famine have you noticed modern Renaults when you put the foot to the floor on neutral the limiter kicks in before the rev dial needle gets to the end, e.g. isnt at the peak point its like 5000rpm then after the limiter bounces the needle eventually hits about 6500rpm?

Sorry about the explanation was harder to write than i thought!#

Barry
 
Funny, my middle aged mother can park in tight spaces in town without stalling it Famine. :lol:. I guess you don't like the Clio then. Tbh they arn't great, they're not as bad as you make out to be but they arn't great by any means.
 
I knew the build quality is **** and the driving position isn't any better from reading magazine reviews, but I wasn't expecting it to be that bad, especialy from one of the range toppers.

About 4 years ago my Dad drove one as a courtesy car and he hated it. He never said why but now I do. :lol:

Fingers crossed when I get my car I can makev a review like this, well maybe not so good. :)
 
I feel for you, Famine... :lol: :lol: :lol: ...that part about driving in the rain at night is something ALL CAR DESIGNERS should actually think LONG and HARD about before they decide we're too stupid to turn anything on by ourselves.

I'd be pretty sore if I'd paid a big chunk of cash for a Merc just to have it totalled because it thought I was too stupid to hit the brakes when I was behind a truck and braked for me... just enough for the truck behind me to slam straight into my rear-end.

Lord knows why, but I think all European cars are getting to that point where we will never have accidents. The cars will do it for us.
 
:lol: When I was learning to drive in a Diesel 1.5 '02 (?) Clio I went through a phase of stalling it (or very nearly stalling it), this was once I'd actually began to feel more comfortable driving. I also stuck it accidentally into 3rd instead of 5th on dual carridgeway slip roads twice :sly: I've never ever EVER done that once in my old style ('93) SEAT Ibiza. And in over a years driving I've only stalled my car twice, once of which when I tried to set off on a hill in 2nd gear after dropping someone off ;) And yeah I agree about the twiddly light controls. My SEAT has a big clunky button the the dash and everytime I press it my passengers wonder what I'm doing. Maybe they think its an ejector seat control ;)

Nice to see someone else has had a similar experience. My overall opinion of the car was that it was nice in that it was a newer car, but felt a bit 'namby pamby'. But then maybe thats just because I'm used to my cars heavy (unassisted) steering and bus like gear change...
 
You see, the Ibiza is a good car, it's a VW Polo in drag. I like SEATS, I'm thinking of a Leon but then I like Saabs and theres a few nice ones going around at the mo. Knowing me I'll probably end up with another Ibiza or this 306 that I've been offered, it's in great condition and at a good price.
 
The 3rd/5th thing is irritating. Even my girlfriend, who drives it daily, can never tell which she's in, other than the noise and the old parallel needle trick (in 5th/top gear in almost any car, the tach needle and the speedo needle should be pointing parallel).

But the clutch is just stupid. There is absolutely no change in pedal strength at any point. There's no inkling where the biting point is. It's just there somewhere - and it may not necessarily be the same place as it was last time.

There's seriously no department at all where this "town car" is better than my "sports car" - other than maybe fuel economy. Even then, we returned 42.5mpg - mine returns 38mpg on a normal long distance grind and, if I was scared to take it over 80mph, it'd probably get into the 40s. She's even remarked that she's rather be a passenger in mine than in hers, and the Clio is supposed to have a softer ride but doesn't (mine's 2 inches lower and has much harder springs).


I can't for the life of me grasp why anyone would want to buy one of these, unless they don't bother driving it for 20/30 miles first.
 
Shurrup. I really want a clio.

Prefferably the 1.4 Dynamique.

We're a reasonably Renaulty family, with a Megane, a Vel Satis (for the time being) and possibly an Avantime.
 
live4speed
You see, the Ibiza is a good car, it's a VW Polo in drag. I like SEATS, I'm thinking of a Leon but then I like Saabs and theres a few nice ones going around at the mo. Knowing me I'll probably end up with another Ibiza or this 306 that I've been offered, it's in great condition and at a good price.

Ahh but my Ibiza isn't a Polo! Its an ermmm, Fiat Strada 'chassis?' based System Porsche engined VW Gearbox powered, errr car. And it has **** rear drum brakes which fail every MoT, I actually got a garage to do it (along with a front wheel bearing, a very tricky job without right tools) this time as I've got a new job. But they came out with some bollocks about the pads cracking in half!?!!? They were brand new last year and it failed on Low Reading, not near non-existant rear brakes. I think I would have noticed as its always parked on a slope. Sorry for the slight rant there :sly:, first time I use a garage and there crap! They had a week to get the parts and the car an entire day and I still have to wait over the weekend to get it back.

I've looked at Saabs, but whilst I like the look of some of them they are a bit too weird. I also hate the dashboards <shudder>. Give me a Volvo any day ;)
 
ultrabeat
Shurrup. I really want a clio.

Prefferably the 1.4 Dynamique.

We're a reasonably Renaulty family, with a Megane, a Vel Satis (for the time being) and possibly an Avantime.

I'll just remind you that the only positive in my review was for the engine, and you want a less powerful one?
 
Sorry, but I don't trust your judgement.
 
I'm not a big Clio fan but my mothers Clio goes fine for her, sher never stalls it while parking around town and it's been very reliable. I don't find it's too tight inside either I'm 5ft 8", but I did prefer my Ibiza.

T5-R I overlooked the fact you're Ibiza was a 93 model, they didn't become Polo's until 97-98 I think. The Leon is a Golf anyway and the Cordoba is a Jetta.
 
Additional - forgot some things I hated immensely:

When anything requiring power happens - wipers starting to wipe, for instance - the fuse box clicks. This is, apparently, "normal".

Indicators (turn signals)... On the Clio they have an exceptionally irritating click sequence which is part-arrhythmical, part-syncopated. They kind of go "Ticktocktick... tockticktock... ticktocktick... tockticktock". When you cancel them, if they've started a tick, they'll do a tock, come hell or high water, making you think you haven't actually cancelled them. No wonder people don't use their indicators any more - they'd have a psychotic episode if they did.
 
I've been, sometimes, forced to drive an old Renault 19 1.4 GTS and many of the faults that you point in the Clio are in the 19 as well. The engine was the only part that seemed ok too (well, the sound was ****, but it had strength) I guess Renault hasn't really evolved it's cars in the last decade! Except maybe in safety.

to live4speed:
I only took an 93 or 94 Ibiza for a spin once, and it was tremendoulsy SLOW!!! It had a 1.4 petrol engine that seemed broken in every single way. I drove for only 5 minutes and I became really desperate... promised myself to never drive an equal Ibiza again.
What bugs me is that many people in my country say that that particular model is quite fast!!!
I'd like to try the newer versions, I'm hoping they are much better.
 
I've never driven a 93 model, the 98+ models a VW's in drag, they're the good ones. They wern't owned or asociated with VW before 98. I had a 1.4 98 model and that was great, it broke down in Spain though, probably still in the same spot lol.
 
The effectively VW 1.4 Ibiza only has 60BHP, so it would be no suprise its slow. Thats the saving grace of my older 93 1.2i Ibiza in that it has a System Porsche engine that produces an ear-bleeding 70BHP. Literally because at 2500 RPM it sounds like 5000RPM in most other small cars...

But it goes all the way up to a truely deafening 6000RPM :lol: Good for scaring old grannies I guess!
 
Which Ibiza? The current 1.4's have 75Bhp, and the 1.2's have just over 60. I've had a 1.4 before (70+)Bhp model and it was nippy, not a rocket or anything but it wasn't as you'd describe "painful".
 
I didn't even care about the car anymore. It was the funniest car review, I've ever read. Then daan comes out with "say what you mean!". :lol: 👍
 
live4speed
Which Ibiza? The current 1.4's have 75Bhp, and the 1.2's have just over 60. I've had a 1.4 before (70+)Bhp model and it was nippy, not a rocket or anything but it wasn't as you'd describe "painful".

Well according to parkers website and my what car used car book the 93-99 1.4 Ibiza has 60BHP which isn't alot for a 900KG car with an unimpressive 0-60 of 14.5. I'm not sure whether your referring to my 'deafening' comment when you say 'painful', but I was referring to the older -93 model like mine!
 
The Ibiza I had was a 98 1.4 that had 72Bhp, not much but the extra 12 makes a difference in a light car. Either way they wern't built to be fast until recently with the Cupra models for each range have made them sportier in image.
 
Nice Review... Ill have to take a clio for a drive to understand if its really as bad as you say it is. But it was a laugh all the same.
 
live4speed
Which Ibiza? The current 1.4's have 75Bhp, and the 1.2's have just over 60. I've had a 1.4 before (70+)Bhp model and it was nippy, not a rocket or anything but it wasn't as you'd describe "painful".

1.4 75bhp! That was the one I drove.
I have to be fair, I asked my friend to drive it and 4 other guys wanted to go with me so the car was full! But I'm sorry it doesn't justify the lack of strength, even in first gear that lacked power...

At the time my dad had a 99 Corolla 2.0 D-4D (That's a Diesel engine! btw some people have asked me this: D-4D stands for: Direct Injection Four-Stroke Diesel)
Anyway I told the Ibiza owner to take it for a spin and he was:"Holy ****" the entire time! The 99 2.0 D4-D has only 90 bhp but it seemed to have almost as twice as the Ibiza.

As you say, those cars weren't built for speed. They want to be pratical and economical and that's it! But as I said, in my country they have the fame of being fast cars, so I was expecting some good performance.
 
live4speed
The Ibiza I had was a 98 1.4 that had 72Bhp, not much but the extra 12 makes a difference in a light car. Either way they wern't built to be fast until recently with the Cupra models for each range have made them sportier in image.

Yeah it wouldn't suprise me if 60BHP was wrong as its pretty pathetic for a 1.4. Hehe I bet the 1992 Ibiza 1.7i Sportline is a great fun ;) Over 100BHP in a car that weighs something like 800KG and whilst being small has a nice wide wheelbase.
 
*bump*

See if anyone can guess what's broken?

She came home last night, long-faced, saying that her car had "a problem". I went out and turned it over (the engine, not the car. Though it's flimsy enough to) and, sure enough, it sounded like a 90 year old mesothelioma sufferer in a gas chamber. "Oh," she said, "I got a light on the dashboard. I checked it in the manual and it says..."

(and this is no word of a lie - this is THE most disturbing description I've ever read for any dashboard light)

"Toxic fume build-up"

At which point I turned the engine off and ran into the house.

Take it down to the garage this morning - the main dealer, remember, of which I have a very low opinion - and they commented:

"Well, we won't be able to look at it today. We can fit it in on Thursday."

WHAT?! THURSDAY?! That's 6 days away before you'll even LOOK at it? I've never, ever, ever in my entire life taken a car to a garage - even a main dealer - with a problem and NOT had it looked at instantly. Ever.

The car is fundamentally undriveable. Well, more so than usual. The engine coughs and splutters and there's no power whatsoever (insert same joke here). So, right now, my other half is driving round "forrun" parts of the UK in a car she hasn't driven for a year. Mine. Excuse me while I just change my underwear again.


Renault = crap. Renault dealers = crappity crappity crap crap.
 
Back