Real Track Speculation *56k Warning*

  • Thread starter Thread starter ALPHA
  • 39 comments
  • 1,994 views
ALPHA

ALPHA

Messages
4,334
I know most of this material isn't new but I've collated it from sources and made this.

This is only speculation and might/might not be true but with some of these images does this mean that some of the other tracks on the GT4P Volume Viewer thing may actually have a higher chance of proving themselves true?

21093.jpg


Most of the tracks on the list is either a license test or reverse version and Gymkhana for those who don't know I think is the Coffee Breaks in GT4P where you knock over cones in a time limit.

So here we go:

GT4-Possibilities-22-01-04-ALPHA-GTPlanet.jpg


So flame me with old material, go ahead otherwise with comments & possibilities from the list - expand apon.
 
I see youve been here since 2001 and you have over 2000 posts and youve been here longer than me but atleast i know to DO A SEARCH FIRST BEFORE POSTING, I know you meant well but there as already been topics on this and a topic which shows the exact same pictures....
 
I think he is aware that those pics have been posted before he is just relating the pics as proof that those tracks are in GT4...very informative. Thanks Alpha 👍
 
I think this is a new angle on old stuff. In other words a contribution.
 
The Skyline in the Yosemite pic is a fake, look under the rear wing, it's a real JGTC skyline pasted onto a GT4 render.
 
Great work there Alpha.
Rport I have to say that his post was a lot more informative than yours :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by live4speed
The Skyline in the Yosemite pic is a fake, look under the rear wing, it's a real JGTC skyline pasted onto a GT4 render.
Click to expand...

It is a fake...damn photo choppers :irked:
 
I see you've been here since 2001 and you have over 2000 posts and you've been here longer than me but at least I know to DO A SEARCH FIRST BEFORE POSTING, I know you meant well but there as already been topics on this and a topic which shows the exact same pictures....
Click to expand...
Well are yea, it wasn't as collated and as thought out was it? Hmmm? Was there E3 Screenshots as well? hmmm? – oh and I’ve marked out some places for apostrophes in your post, maybe next time you could improve upon your grammar and your reading, mines not the best but at least I try.

You see I mentioned in the very FIRST line of my post that this was old, you as a member nearly marking his 1st GTP Anniversary should realise to think before you speak and to read the whole post.
The Skyline in the Yosemite pic is a fake, look under the rear wing, it's a real JGTC skyline pasted onto a GT4 render.
Click to expand...
Full Sized Picture ~

GT4Conner012.jpg


You decide, I don’t know.
 
That's a Xanavi Skyline.

But, even for me that Skyline look's way to real against the surrounding road and wall.
 
Look here under the wing.
 
The pic didnt show, so here it is.
 
It doesn't show? Here is the full size to help, so whats wrong with the back spoiler?

Yes the car looks real and isn't an in game car I realised that when I found it.
 

Attachments

  • gt4conner012.jpg
    gt4conner012.jpg
    91.7 KB · Views: 288
What's wrong with the back spoiler?

Nothing really. You know the tracks like Grand Valley, how they have those big pillars on the front straight it's just one of those and it look's as if it's cut and pasted, but it isn't.
 
Look underneath it, between the wing and the boot and you'll see that it is different scenery. The pic didn't show in the first post but it works fine in my second one for me. Funny thing this interweb.
 
The concrete bit is the extension of the Bridgestone pillar, obviously and yes the bit above appears to have been duplicated 3 times, so what does this prove?
 
I have no clue, ALPHA. Like you said it is an extension of the pillar.
 
No, you have to zoom in to really see it, theres a bit right under the rear wing where it's been cut from it's original picture thats different scenery. Also look through the windows and the advertising hoardings are different as well.
 
I do apoligise, it can be frustrating but lets just leave it at that, the car isn't in game obviously because it doesn't have the obvious GT look and has high res textures so it must be real or a high res PD render.

I'll just wait and see when the game comes out but DO you think this could be Deep Forest because of the tracks elevations?
 
I personally can't see it either. But IMO the car just doesn't look right on the background, and with that close up shot it does look like it been shopped onto that background.:)

Edit: just read Alphas post. My money is on a new deep forest.:)
 
I think that IS deep forest because of track elevations, but with the pic being fake it could be from GT3, but hten I think all the GT3 tracks will be ni GT4, KY said something about previose GT tracks being in but was a little unclear.
 
In GTC some of the tracks from GT3 had slight adjustments like Midfield its a lot brighter and the sky is a different texture. Swiss Alps and Tahiti had the odd advertisement banner added in or changed, so I wouldn't be surprised if some of the tracks from GT3 got updated like Laguna Seca has been updated to Mazda Raceway - I saw in a screen on the bridge where it usually says Honda etc.

I've got to go, I'll be back to continue the discussion if there is one left.
 
If you wanna tell if the car is fake well just look at the left light and see that bright reflection, I have never seen that good of detail on a GT4 car yet and i doubt its a GT4 car it deff looks like a real car...
 
If you wanna tell if the car is fake well just look at the left light and see that bright reflection, I have never seen that good of detail on a GT4 car yet and i doubt its a GT4 car it deff looks like a real car...
Click to expand...

I've already said its not an in game car, although the track is.
 
It is fake. I wasn't sure, but, looking through the windows, the adverts are defenitely different.
 
the car isn't real becaue the real racing car's window's arn't that much tinted. It could be from the starting video or something?
 
if that skyline was ingame i would burn my xbox and pc, it looks too good too be running on ANY pc let alone a ps2

its an obvious photo shop, the car also has dirt on it, too many polys, no gt style graphics too it, and WAY WAY WAY to detailed. It's easy to tell when something looks wrong, but harder to explain why :)

still, Gt5 eh peeps ;)...make that GT6
 
Back