2007 Jaguar XK

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zardoz
  • 35 comments
  • 2,256 views
Messages
2,208
Jag released some pics of the 2007 XK. Sure looks like an Aston, but I doubt that anybody will have a problem with that...

jaguar2007xk7co.jpg


jaguar2007xk27jb.jpg
 
Looks like they've tweaked the corners a little... weren't the NY showcar tails LED?

The front is distinctive enough, and looks enough like the old XK for it not to be a total Aston rip-off, but it looks too much like the AM in rear-three-quarters.

Thank God it's shaping up, though... Jag really needs some new-ish looking cars in their line-up.
 
It has a large Aston look about in ters of shape, in the details theres plenty different between them though. I'm liking the way this car looks a lot and it's price should be competitive for the luxury coupe market.
 
I've already seen 3 of these on the roads, test cars that is. They sound like astons too 👍
 
And I thought that the DB9 was proof enough that Ian Callum has completely run out of ideas. 👎

The last great Callum design was the F-type (which there are rumors it has been greenlighted again). The DB9 looks like Vanquish leftovers and is nowhere near the jawdropper the DB7 was.

And now thanks to Callum's infinite unoriginality, the still sexy after all these years XK8 is getting replaced by a non-descript blot of a DB9 leftover.

Sorry Ford, the gravy train is over. Seek out another classically trained chief of design who ascribes to curvilinear styling because Ian Callum is all used up.
 
Layla's Keeper
...The DB9 looks like Vanquish leftovers and is nowhere near the jawdropper the DB7 was...

Have to disagree with you. I've seen two DB-9s on the road and one parked, which I spent a few minutes admiring. I've come to the conclusion that, IMHO, the Aston-Martin DB-9 is the best-looking car ever, period. To me, every line, proportion, and curve is absolutely flawless. Every little detail is perfect. The DB-9 works for me.

Meanwhile, Mr. Callum is indeed a bit defensive about the Aston-ness of the new XK:

"The forthcoming Jaguar XK 4.2 replaces the current XK8 after that model's ten years of gorgeous service around the world. It is scheduled to go on sale in the spring as a 2007 model. The new XK is virtually identical to the Advanced Lightweight Coupe concept that was shown in Detroit this past January.

"The new feline will be offered both as a hardtop coupe and as a convertible with a traditional folding canvas top. As is the case with the current car, normally aspirated and supercharged V-8 engines will be offered. Development at Germany's Nürburgring racetrack and a six-speed, paddle-shifted automatic transmission should inject a higher degree of sportiness into the XK formula. Like the XJ sedan, the XK uses lightweight aluminum body panels and rivet bonding techniques, which should help it accelerate from zero to sixty mph in less than six seconds.

"The practical hatchback design echoes Jaguar's E-type coupe of the 1960s and early '70s. Although the concept car was criticized for being something of an Aston Martin clone, Jaguar styling chief Ian Callum insists that the XK silhouette is a must-have for a front-engine, rear-drive coupe and has indicated that the design both inside and out foreshadows the look of future Jaguars, which he claims will be more curvaceous and flamboyant than the tailored and formal Aston Martin look."

"More curvaceous and flamboyant" or not, I like it:

jaguar2007xk38xc.jpg


jaguar2007xk46bv.jpg


I think I could learn to live with this:

jaguar2007xk52pz.jpg
 
I don't like the lights in the front or the back, and that oval in the front. It should look more aggressive.
 
I love it...it looks brilliant. However, it does look like a baby Aston--which in my opinion isn't a bad thing...that having been said that shape should stop here...Ford doesn't need to bring out any more coupes using this shape.
 
Layla's Keeper
And I thought that the DB9 was proof enough that Ian Callum has completely run out of ideas. 👎

The last great Callum design was the F-type (which there are rumors it has been greenlighted again). The DB9 looks like Vanquish leftovers and is nowhere near the jawdropper the DB7 was.

And now thanks to Callum's infinite unoriginality, the still sexy after all these years XK8 is getting replaced by a non-descript blot of a DB9 leftover.

Sorry Ford, the gravy train is over. Seek out another classically trained chief of design who ascribes to curvilinear styling because Ian Callum is all used up.
I dissagree with everything in this post, the DB9 is Callums greates work, it's far, far cleaner and better looking than the Vanquish, which doesn't look as clean as a regular DB7 or DB7 GT. If anyone wants to argue the DB9 isn't the best looking car on earth, don't say the Vanquish is better, I can accept people thinking the DB7 is better but not a Vanquish. The XK doesn't look like a DB9 either, it looks more like a DB7, even then only in profile from a few angles. In the details they're very different.
 
I never said the Vanquish was better looking than the DB7. Honestly, I can't stand the Vanquish's squared off haunches as they look positively amateurish compared to the flowing fenders of the DB7.

The moment I first saw the DB7 in 1997, it was like a shockwave had just hit me the car was so perfect from very angle. I wouldn't hesitate to put the DB7 in the same pantheon as the Lamborghini Miura, Ferrari 250GT series, Iso Grifo A3L/Bizzarini 5300GT Strada, Maserati Ghibli, Aston Martin DB4GT Zagato, and 1963 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray.

The DB9 just doesn't seem to have the same breathtaking impact as the DB7. It's haunches are blunt and crude, its "face" a reshapen afterthought, and its front fenders have a half-baked droop to them at the a-pillar.

I will admit that the DB9 has as sexy of a side profile as the DB7. I love the rake of the windshield and the flow of the backlight.

Honestly, I have always felt that Callum's finest work was the XK180/F-Type roadster. That car, with its dramatic wraparound windshield and decklid headrest fairings, its radically curvy fenders, and its beautifully faired in headlights, was gorgeous no matter how you viewed it.

And I feel Callum lost steam after the F-type was canned and that it's part of the reason the Vanquish, the DB9, the AMV8, and the Jaguar XK aren't as adventurous, daring, and classically beautiful as the DB7.
 
Having seen many a DB9 in the metal and being inside one I can say the DB9 is the probably better looking than the DB7 imo. maybe not so in the pictures as can be the case, I wasn't too keen on the lights when I first saw the pics, but when you see a DB9 infront of you it's just beautiful. The Vanquish is a beefed up DB7 style, which looks good but the haunches as you said don't fit the car quite right, if they got thoes right then I'd rave about that for looks too, it's still a great looking car but I always notice the haunches which arn't in synch with the rest of the car. The AMV8 is a fine looking car imo, not as beautiful as other Astons but then neither was the V8 Vantage of old, I rate the looks of the AMV8 though.
 
Layla's Keeper
Honestly, I have always felt that Callum's finest work was the XK180/F-Type roadster. That car, with its dramatic wraparound windshield and decklid headrest fairings, its radically curvy fenders, and its beautifully faired in headlights, was gorgeous no matter how you viewed it.

And I feel Callum lost steam after the F-type was canned and that it's part of the reason the Vanquish, the DB9, the AMV8, and the Jaguar XK aren't as adventurous, daring, and classically beautiful as the DB7.

Although a lot of this is true, your opinion is disregarding the design brief that Callum was given with every single one of these cars. For instance, Aston Martin hasn't ever really had a radical, out of the loop design face. They've always revolved around class and sophistication. For example, the company would never want to release a dramatic, radical design, because that was never what they wanted with releasing a new "flagship" coupe, the DB9. For the Vanquish, however, Callum was most likely given the task of coming up with a more daring and edgier model to fit in the range. He did that, if he succeeded is a personal opinion of every viewer. I can't really understand some of the more adventurous lines there, but that's just me.

You keep mentioning the F-Type and XK180, which is a stellar, more unique design. Now take a look at what Callum's task was at Jaguar, at the time. He had to create a model that would both stun and impress everybody, in an effort to "uplift" the Jaguar name (not the case with Aston). He knows the car was a success without a doubt, the fact that it got canned most likely did not affect his mindset.

Keeping this all in mind, let's see take a look at another Callum design, and the company's intentions with that model. Ian Callum designed the BMW Z8. Now, who is going to complain about that design? What was Callum's objective with the Z8? Look at the results...

Now, that brings us to the question, why does the new XK resemble the AM line so much? Jaguar still needs a revival, but they have a lot to lose, their entire name. The XK revival had to be just as spectacular as the previous, but still needed to have class, and this is where that AM influence comes in. That's my guess. I say, give Callum another chance with a more lose and raw design brief, and he won't disappoint. Make him design a TVR, then he'd shine.

"What was even more wonderful was that my brother Moray and also having his own success. There's a photograph of the two of us together infront of the DB7. I said to Moray that his Lagonda concept would make a great Jag. He said 'So would yours.'"
-Ian Callum, describing the day of March 3, 1993, in Geneva.
 
live4speed
...but when you see a DB9 infront of you it's just beautiful...

Absolutely. Pictures don't even begin to do it justice. You have to see one "in the flesh", so to speak, to really understand how gorgeous the DB-9 is.
 
Zardoz
Absolutely. Pictures don't even begin to do it justice. You have to see one "in the flesh", so to speak, to really understand how gorgeous the DB-9 is.

I've seen the car in pictures, and I've also seenthe car in person, had a chance to do the whole exterior tour of the thing. I can say it is exactly how I thought it would be, to be honnest. No surprises...
 
eliseracer
I've seen the car in pictures, and I've also seenthe car in person, had a chance to do the whole exterior tour of the thing. I can say it is exactly how I thought it would be, to be honnest. No surprises...

I agree with you there, in fact walking round silverstone car park i saw three. They really didn't look all that impresive or gorgeous, especially when parked next to Vanquish S and a Sagaris. IMO the DB9 is quite plain for a £100,000 GT Car and i think this new Jag looks a bit better.
 
You think the Vanquish is better looking than a DB9, the Vanquish (including the S) is the worst looking Aston on sale at the moment. The Sagaris while impressive and having quite some presence isn't beautiful. I love it's looks but it isn't beautiful. Imo the DB9 is the best looking car, ever made. I can appreciate it isn't in other peoples opinions but worse than a Vanquish :odd:.
 
Yeah, after looking at them side by side, i think the vanquish looks better, although (technically speaking) probably the worst aston on sale IMO it looks best, not £70,000 better mind.

Oh and the Sagaris is beautiful just in an overly aggresive way :)
 
Does anyone know the price point on this XK? I really love the looks of this thing...
 
I've seen many a Vanquish and I think it looks too bloated and I hate, absolutely hate the hauches at the rear, I think they are the worst part of the whole Aston range and don't fit in with the rest of the curves.Oh well, each to his own I guess.
 
Jordan
Does anyone know the price point on this XK? I really love the looks of this thing...
Prices should start at £50k, I think that would be around $80-90k.
 
Yes, this car looks great. The latest Top Gear magazine which I purchased today has a DVD with footage of the car in testing (at Nurburgring and such) and of the final product. Very nice.

The AM V8 was on the same DVD, and had much better footage and extras than the XK though.
 
live4speed
I've seen many a Vanquish and I think it looks too bloated and I hate, absolutely hate the hauches at the rear, I think they are the worst part of the whole Aston range and don't fit in with the rest of the curves.Oh well, each to his own I guess.

I don't like the haunches above the rear wheels much either, but i think the DB9 is a bit too plain around that area. It kind of looks like the designers didn't really know what to put there lol
 
Hang on, on the DVD it said 2006 Jaguar XK, not 2007.
 
G.T
Hang on, on the DVD it said 2006 Jaguar XK, not 2007.
You'll see that depending on where you look. It's the same car.
 
Back