- 7,113
- Lisboa
- FLAT_TWELVE
Whilst browsing I came upon this link, from the ACO's site. It is a 15 page-long PDFed document, I suppose it is the document the ACO delivered to the press during the press conference last June 14th.
http://www.lemans.org/wpphpFichiers...rence_de_presse/technical_regulation_2014.pdf
I have heard many critical opinions on these LMP1 regulations, and I am myself a lover of open prototypes, but overall I think the concerns addressed and the way the ACO (and FIA) have dealt with them is to be commended.
I especially like the "bring it on" attitude regarding engines. I have grown more and more against the whole idea of spec-racing, up to a point where I actually hate it. I look into the racing of old and I just love to see so many entirely different vehicles battling. If this is self evident in vintage footage of rallying and sports cars, it is also evident in the single seaters of old. I belong to a generation that heard the Cosworth V8s battling the Boxer 12s in F1. And that was great.
I think the ACO tried to keep it open, while at the same time trying to keep it safe, and not overly expensive. Moreover, I think the ACO tried to keep sports cars a proving ground for manufacturers and the technologies that interest them
from a R&D point of vue.
My biggest concern, however, is competitiveness. But, as you may read in the document linked, they reserve themselves the right to change the specs for any technical solution if the balance in the relative performance of the cars is not achieved.
About this "ability to change the rules" we can say, as Ardius about the DeltaWing, that an artificial "performance target" does not allow us to understand what technology is more efficient. And that is true already for a few years, because nobody can say if Diesel is better than Petrol, it's the regs that favour one or the other.
But the truth is that both types of engines get tested, pushed to the limits, and both technologies get developed and researched. Honda, Nissan, Toyota in the Petrol department, Audi, Peugeot and now Mazda in the diesel department. And, so far, I take it as a given that Audi (with Williams), Peugeot and Toyota's R&D "Hybrid" departments are hugely thankful to Le Mans racing for the data they have gathered (Peugeot only in testing, sadly).
PS - I know the 2014 LMP1 regs were already referred to in both the Race thread and the "openwheel racing" thread (because of the "open cockpit" debate) but their discussion in those threads is a bit off topic and in any case ends up "buried" between all the many on-topic posts.
PPS - I hope you enjoy reading the document linked. It's an easy read, and instructive too. And if we're willing to discuss the ACO's move, then it's better if we do it well documented! Let's all be armchair engineers and racing series organizers!
http://www.lemans.org/wpphpFichiers...rence_de_presse/technical_regulation_2014.pdf
I have heard many critical opinions on these LMP1 regulations, and I am myself a lover of open prototypes, but overall I think the concerns addressed and the way the ACO (and FIA) have dealt with them is to be commended.
I especially like the "bring it on" attitude regarding engines. I have grown more and more against the whole idea of spec-racing, up to a point where I actually hate it. I look into the racing of old and I just love to see so many entirely different vehicles battling. If this is self evident in vintage footage of rallying and sports cars, it is also evident in the single seaters of old. I belong to a generation that heard the Cosworth V8s battling the Boxer 12s in F1. And that was great.
I think the ACO tried to keep it open, while at the same time trying to keep it safe, and not overly expensive. Moreover, I think the ACO tried to keep sports cars a proving ground for manufacturers and the technologies that interest them
from a R&D point of vue.
My biggest concern, however, is competitiveness. But, as you may read in the document linked, they reserve themselves the right to change the specs for any technical solution if the balance in the relative performance of the cars is not achieved.
About this "ability to change the rules" we can say, as Ardius about the DeltaWing, that an artificial "performance target" does not allow us to understand what technology is more efficient. And that is true already for a few years, because nobody can say if Diesel is better than Petrol, it's the regs that favour one or the other.
But the truth is that both types of engines get tested, pushed to the limits, and both technologies get developed and researched. Honda, Nissan, Toyota in the Petrol department, Audi, Peugeot and now Mazda in the diesel department. And, so far, I take it as a given that Audi (with Williams), Peugeot and Toyota's R&D "Hybrid" departments are hugely thankful to Le Mans racing for the data they have gathered (Peugeot only in testing, sadly).
PS - I know the 2014 LMP1 regs were already referred to in both the Race thread and the "openwheel racing" thread (because of the "open cockpit" debate) but their discussion in those threads is a bit off topic and in any case ends up "buried" between all the many on-topic posts.
PPS - I hope you enjoy reading the document linked. It's an easy read, and instructive too. And if we're willing to discuss the ACO's move, then it's better if we do it well documented! Let's all be armchair engineers and racing series organizers!