- 39,106
- Application hell
- MP-Omnis
I'm having a brainfart at the moment.
When is it appropriate to use Toleration as opposed to Tolerance? Are they freely interchangeable? Conditional?
I have this sentence: "Young society is therefore unable to demonstrate patience and toleration."
Should that instead be tolerance? Looking at the definitions, I've seen these two:
"1. a disposition to tolerate or accept people or situations; 'all people should practice toleration and live together in peace'"
and this:
"1. an act or instance of tolerating, esp. of what is not actually approved; forbearance: to show toleration toward the protesters."
So, my sentence is valid according to the first definition. But, is it? The 2nd one says that toleration is only an instance, meaning that tolerance is the practice of tolerating, whereas the first says toleration is the practice of tolerance.
I love this language.
When is it appropriate to use Toleration as opposed to Tolerance? Are they freely interchangeable? Conditional?
I have this sentence: "Young society is therefore unable to demonstrate patience and toleration."
Should that instead be tolerance? Looking at the definitions, I've seen these two:
"1. a disposition to tolerate or accept people or situations; 'all people should practice toleration and live together in peace'"
and this:
"1. an act or instance of tolerating, esp. of what is not actually approved; forbearance: to show toleration toward the protesters."
So, my sentence is valid according to the first definition. But, is it? The 2nd one says that toleration is only an instance, meaning that tolerance is the practice of tolerating, whereas the first says toleration is the practice of tolerance.