Yes, as you can see by the smiley on the outside of this "thread," I'm angry. Angry because I've been lied to. All my life, they've told me that London is a city. But now, I ask. If London was a real city, shouldn't they have automobiles? Obviously. But they haven't got any, as proven below...
...the streets of this two-story town "London" have no cars on them, two days in a row. I'm surprised they're even paved, or this 'city' has cameras, or that the residents of this car-less village even know what a camera is.
Why is the lighting on the left side of the street different on the 28th? Now that is odd. I mean, it's not like there's any cars passing through the dilapidated junction.
...the streets of this two-story town "London" have no cars on them, two days in a row. I'm surprised they're even paved, or this 'city' has cameras, or that the residents of this car-less village even know what a camera is.
Why is the lighting on the left side of the street different on the 28th? Now that is odd. I mean, it's not like there's any cars passing through the dilapidated junction.