Audi R8 V10 fail

  • Thread starter Thread starter XLR_8_TION
  • 11 comments
  • 1,648 views
Messages
51
Australia
NSW
Messages
XLR_8_TION & capital_J97
has anyone else noticed that if you look at the motor of the R8 V10 it doesnt say 5.2 as it should, it actually says 4.2. looks like PD did another copy and paste
 
Yes, I think it's been covered before.
 
Can you post a pic?
 
original


That's a V8 in there, not a V10...

2012-audi-r8-gt-spyder-8_460x0w.jpg


Real V10's engine.
 
When was that picture taken? Because I'm pretty sure that this has been patched.
 
When was that picture taken? Because I'm pretty sure that this has been patched.

I don't know, I just used Google Images because I'm away from my PS3 right now.
 
has anyone else noticed that if you look at the motor of the R8 V10 it doesnt say 5.2 as it should, it actually says 4.2. looks like PD did another copy and paste

Wow, a proper fail, good spotting. I was all ready to shoot you down, I hate, HATE, the people who do false fails, but the images prove it, but atleast the physics should be alright.
 
Was fixed several patches ago I'm pretty sure. It was ridiculous that it was that way in the first place (like the Acura NSX taillights) considering how much people like to harp on the attention to detail put into the Premiums, but not really an issue now.
 
Was fixed several patches ago I'm pretty sure. It was ridiculous that it was that way in the first place (like the Acura NSX taillights) considering how much people like to harp on the attention to detail put into the Premiums, but not really an issue now.

What was wrong with the Acura NSX taillights?
 
What was wrong with the Acura NSX taillights?

The car originally had the ones from the redesigned NSX rather than the ones that were used from 1990-2000 like it should have had.




It was fixed relatively early on, though.
 
Back