BMW M5 (F10) 30 Jahre 2014

  • Thread starter Thread starter LJ12
  • 16 comments
  • 3,768 views
LJ12

LJ12

Messages
986
Norway
Bergen (GMT +2)
Messages
LAMBOKID12
BMW celebrates the 30th anniversary of the M5, and this special edition is the most powerful factory standard BMW M5 ever made.

Specs:


Engine: BMW S63B44TU Twin Turbo V8.
Transmission: M-DKG 436 Twin Clutch "Automatic" with Paddle Shifters.
Drivetrain: FR.

Power: 600 BHP and 700 NM.
0-100: 3.9 Seconds.
Top Speed: 315 KPH (Without limiter.)
Weight: 1990 KG.


BMW-30-Jahre-M5-10.jpg


30-Jahre-BMW-M5-2014-Sondermodell-600-PS-02.jpg


BMW_M5_2014_Edition_30_Jahre_Cockpit.jpg


BMW-M5-30-7-620x420.jpg


 
finnracer
Bloody Hell that is heavy!
Click to expand...
But with 600 BHP, it is quite balanced. But again, 1990 kg IS a lot of weight.
 
Humungus
But then again, its competitors all weigh around 1,9-2 tons as well.
Click to expand...
It is a general theme in that class which only Audi have managed to reverse so far, although this is still a huge 200kg heavier than the E60 M5!
 
Crazy how even with recent advances in the usage of lightweight materials this manages to weigh 275kgs more than the E60 M5, which wasn't exactly lacking equipment in the first place. Hopefully the next generation of super saloons can reverse the trend.
 
SCER
Crazy how even with recent advances in the usage of lightweight materials this manages to weigh 275kgs more than the E60 M5, which wasn't exactly lacking equipment in the first place. Hopefully the next generation of super saloons can reverse the trend.
Click to expand...
The chance the next 5-Series and M5 is going to be lighter than the current F10/F11 5-Series is big (atleast I think so!) The reason beeing the fact EU want the car industry to have lighter and more fuel efficient cars.

And I do agree, the current M5 is too heavy compared to the E60 and E61 M5. The engine, transmission and chassis make up fir it though.
 
despite being powerful it probably under steers with that much weight and it's acceleration isn't probably great either. i like lightweight cars, such as a lotus or a caterham.
 
cbarbosa
👍 Great suggestion!

Really like the colour also...
Click to expand...
Have to disagree on the paint, sadly. Never liked matte paint on cars. Makes them look unfinished, in my oppinion.
 
Piotr Jawniak
despite being powerful it probably under steers with that much weight and it's acceleration isn't probably great either. i like lightweight cars, such as a lotus or a caterham.
Click to expand...
Understeery? propably yes, but then again, it wouldn't be a problem to fit a better suspension for example.

The acceleration is incredible though, me and my dad tested an M5 F10 before the summer, and this thing accelerates like h***! Really fast, and the gearbox is smooth and shifts gears faster than you can blink!

But I understand you aswell when it comes to an Caterham for example. An Caterham with half the power of an M5 will propably destroy the M5 around a track, and under acceleration.

But I prefer cars like the M5, because they are really quick, sounds great, and can be used everyday. But that's my oppinion though.
 
LJ12
Have to disagree on the paint, sadly. Never liked matte paint on cars. Makes them look unfinished, in my oppinion.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, maybe your right. I guess I am tired of the traditional blue... :)
 
Love the matte paint.
 
Last edited:
MobilMalik
Uhhh... Why did you just post a link to a locked thread about the same car in the OP? :odd:
Click to expand...
Sorry, didn't mean to do it.
 
Back