Brain Transplants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Condraz23
  • 10 comments
  • 714 views

Condraz23

(Banned)
Messages
215
Hey everyone.

I believe that human head and brain transplants will be feasible in about 200 years into the future.

Although many scientists would challenge the feasibility of this process, few would say that it is not eventually possible given current research into organ transplant and human cloning. It has been pointed out that the age of a body that a brain could be transplanted into should be sufficient. The adult-sized brain could only fit into the skull of a body at least seven years old as that is when the head reaches adult size.

Today, the procedure seems to be an unlikely if not impossible goal. However, other technologies, such as human cloning and genetic engineering, seemed equally impossible a generation ago.

The most significant barrier to the procedure is the inability of nerve tissue to heal properly. Scarred nerve tissue doesn't transmit signals well and this is the reason a spinal cord injury is so devastating. However, recent research involving tissue-regenerating mice may provide pointers for further research as to how to regenerate nerves without scarring.

However, the technology needed for cooling tissues to enable head transplantation is available and the procedure is already established. Two operations would need to be conducted simultaneously in the same operating room. All tissues and muscles in the neck would be separated and catheters coated in heparin would be inserted into arteries and vessels to ensure a continuous blood flow to the brain. The spinal cord would then be separated and the head transferred to the second body.

Interestingly, the technology needed for brain and head transplantation is already available today. However, the fact that technology is not yet sufficiently advanced to repair neural tissue like the spinal cord means that once severed, everything from the neck downwards would be paralyzed.

white.jpg


Dr. Robert White is a pioneering brain transplant surgeon, best known for his successful head transplants on monkeys. The scientist behind it wants to do the same thing to humans, but most other members of the scientific community have condemned the experiments as "grotesque".

He transplanted a whole monkey's head onto another monkey's body, and the animal survived for some time after the operation. The professor believes the operation is the next step in the transplant world. The monkey was conscious, and that it could see, hear, taste, and smell because the nerves were left intact in the head. He admitted that it could appear "grotesque", but said there had been ethical considerations throughout the history of organ transplants...

“At each stage, kidney, heart, liver, and so forth, ethical considerations have been considered, especially with the heart, which was a major problem for many people and scientists, and the brain, because of its uniqueness poses a major ethical issue as far as the public and even the profession is concerned. We discovered that you can keep a human brain going without any circulation. It's dead for all practical purpose, for over an hour, then bring it back to life. If you want something that's a little bit science fiction, that is it!”

Other scientists were not so pleased...

“This is medical technology run completely mad and out of all proportion to what's needed.”

Many people believe that the experiments are the sort that are wholly unethical and inappropriate for any possible reason. Some bioethicists would argue that there are difficult moral problems involved in harvesting a brain-dead body, especially one deliberately created using human cloning.

Nevertheless, it is important to note that a successful brain or head transplant has the potential to extend the life of a human being by more than 80 years and cure almost 90% of all human diseases.

200 years ago, people considered disease and injury to be the result of supernatural intervention and insisted that cures were only possible through prayer. We have come a long way since then. If the trend continues, I suspect that brain and head transplants will be feasible in about 200 years into the future, and along with it will come many drastic changes in almost all aspects of mankind.
 
The last bit sounds like a stretch, curing diseases. I don't know how that would work, but it sounds like putting a "diseased" brain into healthy body.

The purpose of this procedure does not seem very strong. Sounds like "body transplant" would be a more appropriate name for the procedure. It looks completely useless. Who would give up their body? If you take the body of someone who has a mental disability, wouldn't that mean killing the disabled? That would be unethical.

It just somehow doesn't seem useful. All I could see would be a celebrity body-swap, but they probably wouldn't go for that. The brain is what makes the non-physical part of a person. Putting a brain somewhere else just puts the person in another place.
 
I think in 200 years this operation will be easy. Try 50 for a rough estimate, and even then I'm sure it could be possible in 20, the technology can't be too far off. It will just take time for public opinion to be swayed.
 
Transplanting your brain would probably make you brain damaged. it would need a constant blood supply during the entire thing. That would kind of suck.
 
I don't see the point in a brain transplant. First of all too many old people have age-related neurological problems such as memory loss, vision loss, and even things as bad as Alzheimer's.

Then if you were to do this with a young person because the body has a fatal disease then you still need a body, which means you have to have another dead person, but that means a dead body. I just don't see it being feasible. Sure, you could probably do it but unless we can clone a human body without it having a conciousness this has too many ethical problems.


Also, I thought the mice spinal regeneration thing turned out to be faked or something.
 
From the standpoint of medical ethics, I don't see any ethical uses for such a procedure.
If an "intact" person dies in some sort of accident, the body will likely be too mangled for another's use.
If a diseased person's body dies, how do you keep the brain intact, while "legally" procuring a body to put it in? How do you keep from spreading the disease to the new body?
If there becomes a legal and ethical method to do this, which is a HUGE if; How do you prevent rejection? It's one thing to use cortico-steroids to prevent organ rejection. But to keep a host body from attacking an " invading" brain, would require a great deal of "chemical intervention" and that would have serious repurcussions on the new brain and the host body.

Unless, we start "body farming" for this purpose (which is an ethical morass of its own), This is not a feasible transplant. Nor is it a needed one. With the ability to clone, you can have yourself "re-manufactured" with all the necessary parts, change the DNA a bit to destroy the disease, and VIOLA! a new you!
Of course, this is also part of the same ethical morass...
 
Yeah, we should concentrate less on brain transplants and more on stem cells and regeneration.

Human Starfish, GO!
 
Gil
How do you prevent rejection? It's one thing to use cortico-steroids to prevent organ rejection. But to keep a host body from attacking an " invading" brain, would require a great deal of "chemical intervention" and that would have serious repurcussions on the new brain and the host body.
Technically wouldn't it be the brain rejecting the new body as it would process the information and then tell the immune system to attack?
 
The immune system is part of the autonomic system and operates independent of thought.
Thereby, adding a new brain, adds an unfamiliar or "enemy" entity to the system.
 
Gil
With the ability to clone, you can have yourself "re-manufactured" with all the necessary parts, change the DNA a bit to destroy the disease, and VIOLA! a new you!
Of course, this is also part of the same ethical morass...
No not really, the clone will not be you, it will be more like a twin brother if you had one. It will not have the memories, thoughts or the experiences in life and growing up that ultimately made you, you. It won't experience the same things as you in it's learning process so it's personality could actually be quite different. If a scientist cloned me I would not be connected to the clones psyche, I would not have any control over the clone at all, the idea that if I died there could be a clone of me wandering about would probably concern me more than comfort me. The idea of having my brain transplanted into a cloned body however would mean that I am still me and if you take ethics out of the equation, could appeal. However harvesting bodies is the only way it could even be feasible and as you said that's a big can of worms right there.
 
No not really, the clone will not be you, it will be more like a twin brother if you had one. It will not have the memories, thoughts or the experiences in life and growing up that ultimately made you, you. It won't experience the same things as you in it's learning process so it's personality could actually be quite different. If a scientist cloned me I would not be connected to the clones psyche, I would not have any control over the clone at all, the idea that if I died there could be a clone of me wandering about would probably concern me more than comfort me. The idea of having my brain transplanted into a cloned body however would mean that I am still me and if you take ethics out of the equation, could appeal. However harvesting bodies is the only way it could even be feasible and as you said that's a big can of worms right there.
That would be the ethical morass to which I referred.
 
Back