Can you read this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTP_DONK
  • 11 comments
  • 877 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
638
Messages
GTDrivers_Gaffer
Only great minds can read this
This is weird, but interesting!

fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too
Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

And no uoy hevan't bene drniknig
 
read it perfectly... which is kinda scary...
cause i have been drinking...
 
I can read it too, but then again, i've spent time reading posts in the GT5:P threads so i'm probably used to it :sly:
 
That's what I was thinking. It gets worse when people who play games in live chat talk and I end up telling them to just shut up because they are intelligible
 
Pretty sure this is a repost. I think the original thread may have had the same title even.
 
Pretty sure this is a repost. I think the original thread may have had the same title even.

I believe the original thread was, "Can You Raed Tihs?"
 
It may be a cilché but I thghout tihs was oledr tahn the inetr wbez.
 
Pretty sure this is a repost. I think the original thread may have had the same title even.

Definitely a repost, the last thread was pretty ancient, though.
 
i dont get why it says only 55 can read it then explains how it is a human mind feature :odd:

55 out of 100, so I would assume it is a human mind feature which only functions correctly 55% of people that said, I have never met anoyone who cannot read this, so I doubt the accuracy of the 55%.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back