[Car] 2006 Mazda 3 s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sage
  • 11 comments
  • 1,601 views

Sage

Staff Emeritus
Messages
12,533
United States
United States
Messages
GTP_Sage
Well, I’ve had my car for over 10 months now (can’t believe it’s been that long!), and I’ve done plenty of driving in it, so I figure some people might want to hear a semi-long-term review, especially because this is the kind of car a lot of younger auto enthusiasts might consider buying.

362833840_d8a834fe72.jpg


362833842_bcf6d7f2d7.jpg


(Pictures taken when I first got it.)

As a pure transportation device, it works nicely. It’s quite large for a compact sedan, and it’ll hold an unbelievable amount of stuff – you can fit a bicycle in the pass-through, and still fit a large suitcase and over five grocery bags in the car (don’t ask how I know). The back seats are a bit tight for taller people, but the seats themselves are wonderfully comfortable and supportive. I don’t know what the ride quality feels like for the passengers, though from what I’ve read it’s probably a bit crunchy – I’ve never received complaints though. Gas mileage is okay, but not great (I can stretch to 30 mpg if I really try, but I usually get closer to 23 mpg). If you’re just looking for comfortable transportation, you should probably look somewhere else; it does well enough, but that’s clearly not Mazda’s main goal with this car. And if you’re bothered by loud tires, then definitely don’t get this.

If you’re an auto enthusiast though – wow! The seats are supportive – sport firm. The clutch is light and relatively forgiving of any mistakes you might make (its uptake is a bit high though, so standing starts tend to be a tad jumpier than you intend). The gear shifter moves fluidly – shifting is very enjoyable in this car, and you can easily do it with your fingertips.

The most remarkable aspect of this car is its roll, or lack thereof. Chuck it into a corner at a stupid speed, and it’ll stay remarkably flat the entire time. Grip is excellent – there’s some understeer at its limits, as you’d expect, but it’s very gradual, and you can easily tuck it in by lifting off just a tad. The back end can be coaxed out, but let’s just say that I won’t condone that kind of driving. Heel-and-toeing is doable (and in fact, I do it all the time, even in regular driving), but it’s a bit meh just because the engine doesn’t perk up as quickly as, say, a Subaru boxer engine.

That engine is marvelous though – 160 hp (less if you live in communists states like me), and more torque than a naturally-aspirated 4-banger should be allowed to make. Its midrange performance is outstanding, and it’ll go like snot if you let it rip to the redline.

The steering is close to perfect, although you’re always aware that it’s electrically-boosted (whirrr-whirrr sounds in parking lots); it doesn’t feel artificial though. It goes exactly where you want it to go when you’re cooking (which is a bit of a problem on the freeway, as you have to constantly correct it, but that’s not where you want to be in this car anyway). The leather steering wheel has sporty dimples in it, and it’s nice and small and fat.

The interior is nice, and impressive for an econobox. Be careful though, because it gets scuffed easily (all-black). Some people don’t like the red instruments, but I think they’re perfect (white and green hurt my eyes at night). Everything feels quality, especially the seats. My only complaint is that mine doesn’t have an auxiliary input, but that’s been rectified for 2007 models.

My particular car has had three “issues” with it. The glovebox rattles, which is a well-known problem – I believe it’s been fixed for 2007 (don’t quote me on that). I haven’t bothered getting it fixed because it doesn’t bother me too much (only on really rough roads). My brakes squealed in the morning, which is another well-known problem – Mazda fixed that at no charge, and now my brakes are perfectly fine. Also, the hose that goes to the windshield wiper washer reservoir got disconnected somehow, so Mazda fixed that for free – I believe that’s an anomaly, because I’ve never heard of anybody else having that problem, and the service people were rather surprised.

So I’d say that quality-wise it’s been good, since none of those were serious issues, and best of all, no trim pieces have fallen off (which is a huge peeve of mine).

I’m sure there’s something I’ve forgotten to talk about – just ask if you have any questions. :)

[size=+1]Mazda 3 s[/size]

Trim: Base s with side/curtain airbags
Cost: ~$17,000

Pros:
• Fast
• Handling is fabulous for a FWD vehicle
• Interior looks like it belongs in a car that costs $10k more
• Wonderful clutch
• Still practical (even more so if you get the hatch)
• A feeling of substantialness

Cons:
• Not as frugal (gas-wise) as other econoboxes
• Won’t carry as much as some competitors
• Loud tires on the freeway
 
Your review sounds very similar to the Mazda6 my parents had. It is pretty much the same for everything - especially the handling comments - except there was lots of space for the rear passengers - probably even more so than an X-Type.

The one rattle issue we had with the car was sorted right away, and when the yearly service came up, that happened quickly and faultlessly. We have never had a car that has given us so few problems. Well, the Civic has hardly any issues at the moment...

The 2.0 engine was full of torque. Driving up a hill, in 5th at 30/35mph, 1500rpm, it would still accelerate somewhat. That may have put some unwanted stress on the engine, but it was interesting none-the-less. :) Revving to the 7000rpm limiter was quite noisy though, but it was good fun. Fuel economy wasn't as good, but better than your figures, of course, due to the smaller engine. Around town it would be around 26mpg, on a run 37/38mpg.

The gearbox, as you say, is brilliant. I've had a try myself (I didn't drive it ;)), and it went into all the gears perfectly smooth. Comparing this to the Chrysler Voyager's, which was like operating a crane, and the Civic's now, which is a little rough, especially going into 5th and 6th, it was awesome.
 
Glad you like it, Sage. I'm lovin' mine, that's for sure, although I've got the 3i instead of the "s". Aside from the horsepower (which tops out at 150 on the i), my review would be pretty much the same. Fast and grippy, with an excellent clutch/shifter. Definitely a good inexpensive car for GT fans who want to go throwing something around corners. :)

I usually get my mileage to average around 29-30mpg, but I generally don't push it on the freeway. Cruising at 70-80 most of the time. I do occasionally punch it getting on the freeway, though... First up to about fifteen to get the car moving (punching it in first will spin the tires), then into second all the way up to sixty. :)
 
What do you mean? Do you mean that if I could go back in time, armed with that knowledge I have now, would I still make the same choice? (Which in that case would be an unequivocal YES!)
 
What do you mean? Do you mean that if I could go back in time, armed with that knowledge I have now, would I still make the same choice? (Which in that case would be an unequivocal YES!)

I mean once it has outlived it's usefulness, perhaps by means of say, an accident (God forbid), would you buy a new Mazda 3?
 
Assuming that I’d have the same funds and that the competition roughly the same as it is today, then yes, absolutely. I can’t think of a better new car for $17,000 for what I want in it – sporty handling married with practicality. I will say that the new VW Rabbit (I almost typed Golf) puts up a very good fight, but from what I’ve read it would probably be a bit too soft for my tastes.
 
Yes the mazda 3 is a great car. I drive my dads SP23 model. Australian model.

Cons
Vision is terribble because of the low profile windows (better for side impacts though) and flared guards. (My dad has a hatch and when you are in tight place you really have to watch where the guards are.) Also the side pillars are thich for the side airbags and roll over protection so you have to try to look around them when go ing around bends.
Also just thinking another con in Austrlia is that the rear brakes make huge amount of brake dust and if you don't wash you car for 2 months you end up with rear black wheels.
And of course the easily scuffable black interior. Easy to get back to new though.
I can't afford a used one. they are holding rediculous value in aus. A new base model neo costs about AU$21000 plus bull**** government charges. I can't find 04 models for less than $19000. And my limit was $10000 so i got the baragain of the centry in australia a 2001 proton waja for AU$6300 on the road. Now my isnurance pays $10200 for a rightoff. I'm allmost at that $19000 mark after that.
Insurance seems to be going up each year. How to provisional drivers afford them. Its bull. Especially where I live. Sure there are some slightly rich people around my area(my parents included) but the amound owned my p drivers in my area is rediculous. Must all be stolen.

Now some good things.

Don't know how but we are doing better then what the adr fuel stikker says. We normally do about 7.9 to 8.2L per 100k's. Sorry don't noe how many mpg that is. I'm sure the govenrment sticker said 8.7L per 100km's. And we arnt excatly doing country driving either. And we don't drive for fuel economy.
Performance like u said, handling, braking by far outclasses the rest of the class. I can't get the tyres to squeal around my streets in 90 degree corners. I get to scared of the speed first. Um we have the bridgestone potenza's here though, not the goodyears. In Australia potenzas are definately the choice over any good year tyre because of our hot weather plus it don't rain.
Definately the transmisson and clutch. I own a proton waja and this makes that tranmision and clutch look like junk even though it is quite good compared to a lot of other small Japanese cars i drove before buying that. The 3 is the best manual car i have personally driven.
Style. The hatch is sorta muscly. I don't really like the sedan though. It looks softer.
Devaluation is minimal at the moment. New lancer, imprezza and corrolla(auris) may effect that though if they are any good.


I'm in Austrlia and have the sp23 04 model sorta your usa 2nd top hatch model(Not including MPS).

What i find odd though is our 07 specs have 6 speed manuals where as from as far as i can tell from the us site u only get 5-speeds. I'm sure it would be easier to produce if they said all 2.3l engines get the 6 speed and 2.0l engines get the 5 speed but thats up to mazda japan. Perosonally i think the 2.0l and 2.3l should all get 6 speed manuals or 5 speed autos.


Edit: just to add we have not had an issue with the car at all except the battery went flat once, jump start fixed that, but that could have been avoidable by my mum not leaving the interior lights on.
 
I can’t think of a better new car for $17,000 for what I want in it – sporty handling married with practicality.
I still can't believe how much car I got for under $18,000. Every day I feel like I fleeced the dealer. So far, my only complaint is the rearward visibilty on the drivers side. I still haven't got the knack checking the blind spot on the left. Every time I turn my head, I'm looking directly into the B-pillar.
 
I've noticed that too, Kylehnat. I usually lean forward a couple inches. But I've always been very good at observing my surroundings anyway, so I usually know if there's a car next to me before I look.
 
Sage, I agree with your review completely. Though my buddy Donovan has a 3i, the two are very similar. His transmission problems that you may remember me talking about were caused by him not letting the whole thing break in. He waited until his CV joints started clicking, then he got that halfshaft and a transmission rebuild under warranty. The trans works great now, and shifts are even better with his heavy knob.

His brakes never squeaked and his glovebox never rattled, so I don't know what that was all about. The thing is darn comfortable for a small, sporty car, and the chassis does feel subsantial, and is. I talked him out of getting strut tower braces simply because the super-stiff frame just doesn't need them without highly tuned suspension components.

The car is one of few with electronic throttles that I've ever been able to drive worth a darn. Yes, I finally got used to it after over 30 hours of experience (not at one time, either) and now I'm nearly as fluent as with my Sol's cable.

My only real gripe that has really stuck with me is the brake pedal. It's feather light. Though I've driven his car quite a bit I've never gotten used to the usper light effort needed, and I just can't seem to low smoothly. The pedal should be firm, because when you're driving hard you can't afford to be moving your feet with authority between pedals and accidentaly tromp the brake pedal midcorner.

The above situation is bad enough, but when you mix it with the car's chronic oversteer (even with larger, wider, and stickier "aftermarket" rubber from a 350Z), the situation can only get worse. It's not at all a problem when cruising or even with a brisk pace through some curves, but when you're driving hard enough that trailbraking is a must, you better have done most of your slowing before you got to the corner.

But how many people drive their 3s that hard? The car is fantastic in everyday use, the light brake aside.
 
I think the pedal is just fine. I wouldn't call it light or heavy; it's just middle-effort. Regardless, it's much better than my dad's 1963 Ford, in which stopping used to be a two-foot effort (he recently converted to disc brakes, however). Be glad those days are gone.
 

Latest Posts

Back