toyomatt84Celeron's were designed for mostly laptop (or other low power components).
emadMy laptop is celeron based and believe me, the piece of crap sucks more juice than a hooker on a busy night. My average battery life for word processing apps is usually around 1.5 to 2 hours...and that's on powersave mode.
Damn I hate IBM's R-series laptops
toyomatt84Dude, don't talk. I have a P4 3.06 Northwood in my laptop. I get 45 mins on a good day. So yeah, Celeron's last longer.
emadstfu, you're on a Desktop Replacement laptop that's actually got DDR ram AND a high quality video card. I'm using a 2 ghz celeron, 256 megs of SDRAM, and a 16 meg radeon mobility. To top that, a really crappy 12 inch LCD which, on it's dimmest settings is still too bright in most cases
I hate my laptop
on a side note, the hard drive crashed a few days back. Now the pricks at tech support in my school are gonna charge me for replacing it... To think, they replace the hard drive when IT dies but they won't replace a defective motherboard or even RMA it for me.
toyomatt84Dude, no need to be supa-pissed. Just remember, techies at schools suck. As for your battery life, you might want to consider a replacement, if available. The numbers you're pulling don't sound logical. A buddy of mine has a similar setup, only with a 15" monitor instead. He gets a good 4 hours on a charge.
They suck.SS69Whats wrong with intel celeron? It has just as many ghz as as pentium or amd but its so much cheaper. why?