Chrysler ME Four Twelve tested

  • Thread starter The359
  • 13 comments
  • 1,346 views
3,736
United States
Macungie, PA
The359
AutoWeek Exec. Editor Kevin A. Wilson (username Behra)

I drove the Chrysler ME412 supercar prototype at Laguna Seca Thursday morning. My first impression. Watch for a more extensive story in a print issue of the magazine later:

We've driven it. It's not only a real car, it's the real deal. Chrysler showed its 850 hp quad-turbo V12 ME Four-Twelve concept car at the Detroit auto show in January and promised we could drive it within the year. The promise has been fulfilled. But it wasn't exactly the show car that did the job.

"When we said that car was a prototype, that was probably a little of bragging on our part," admitted Chrysler Group CEO Dieter Zetche over dinner Wednesday night. "We found out how much harder it was to build a real prototype of a car with this much performance. There are a lot of 24/7 engineering hours on the program. This car, though, is a running prototype."

Indeed it is. Looking stealthy in naked flat black carbon fiber bodywork, it's really a test mule that has been running for about a month, long enough to prove that the target performance figures were real. In Chrysler's own tests, conducted on a 12,000-ft. long runway at an abandoned military airbase (Wurtsmith AFB) at Oscoda, Michigan, the car ran 0-60 mph in 2.9 seconds, to 100 mph in 6.2 seconds (faster than most cars get to 60 mph) and ran a 10.6 second quarter-mile at 136 mph. And it doesn't perform that well only because it's a mule. There's really nothing cobbly about this car...the interior isn't finished with leather and other goodies, the switchgear is makeshift rather than productionized, and you can sometimes hear a minor "clunk" in the carbon-fiber/aluminum composite chassis when you stress the car in a corner, but it's a solid piece of work--but still a little heavier than Chrysler's target.

"These figures are conservative," said Dan Knott, head of the SRT performance operations at DaimlerChrysler's Chrysler Group about the numbers posted at Oscoda. "As with our other performance products, we want to make sure the numbers we claim are numbers that customers can really achieve."

We're not so sure about that in the sense that the numbers really require a good driver with high g-tolerances, but we can say the car is "user friendly" and that most drivers could get an awesome experience even well inside the car's limits.

Given that there is only one mule, that there are 8 other drivers in line this morning (not counting Zetsche or Jochen Mass, who took the turns after the press guys were done), and that we value our own skin, we won't be trying to achieve such dramatic levels of performance here at Laguna. When we arrive, before 8 a.m., the place was well socked-in with fog, but by the time we'd done a walk-around the car and a few laps of orientation in a van driven by a Skip Barber instructor, it had lifted enough to at least see the corners--even the infamous Corkscrew at the top of the hill.

When my turn arrived, I donned the helmet and climbed in beside Herb Helbig, perhaps best known to enthusiasts as the keeper of the Viper flame, and one of several more-than-competent hot shoe development engineers on the project. Herb asked if he would get hazardous duty pay for riding with me--I told him to take it up with SRT operations chief Dan Knott or his boss, Eric Ridenour.

Getting in the car is a bigger chore than it would be for a productionized version. The racing seat is fixed in place, and there's a four-point harness to do up.

Adjust the steering column, eyeball the digital instrument panel that travels up and down with the column, get a feel for the placement of the paddle shifters behind the steering wheel (it's a racing wheel, removable for entry/exit--in production, you'd be able to push the seat back more and tilt the column up for those purposes), place your foot on the brake (it's a two-pedal car) and thumb the red start button.

The 6.0-liter V12 comes to life with a lusty roar. This AMG-built mill, designed specifically for the project, couples to a seven-speed dual clutch transmission with electronically controlled wet clutch. It was the last element to be installed into the mule--some early testing was done with a substitute, but it will work flawlessly for nearly 3 hours of track time this morning.

For now, at least, initial gear selection is accomplished with a metal dial on the dash that looks like something off a Radio Shack rheostat. There's an N for Neutral and a D for Drive and an R for reverse. There's one notch in between N and D that could be, well, full manual? Race-performance? It's unlabeled on the mule, and they didn't want us playing with it yet.
So we picked "D" and eased into the throttle--you don't just go jumping all over 850 lbs.-ft. of torque in pitlane with people all around. Easing into the experience is advisable, but not too slowly--we'll only get three laps on our first go, and another two later.

The sound as the engine climbs toward its 6200 rpm redline is terrific. Unlike the shrieking sound of, say, an Enzo (we saw three in our first 24 hours on the penninsula), which has the same displacement and cylinder count, this engine has the low-pitched growl of a monster. Routing the exhaust through four turbos has something to do with it, as must the tuning of the system feeding the four pipes that exit at the tail.

On our first laps, we find the chassis solid, the suspension not race-car stiff on this smooth pavement but allowing a tiny little amount of roll and pitch, somewhat similar to other high-performance midengine cars we've driven lately, such as the Ford GT. With an extra 300 hp or so in hand, though, the ME Four-Twelve raises the game on performance.

Steering is responsive, sharp and quick, with a 16:1 ratio, only 2.5 turns lock to lock, despite an excellent (for its class) turning circle of 36 ft. Quick turn-in means you have to be careful not to apex the turns at Laguna too early--it really wants to dive in when you get the line right into the corners.

Once we've got the engine singing, we try the paddle shifter and it responds as quickly as the Enzo's. Since we're not going for any lap records here, though, I figured I'd let it shift for itself most of the time, and it handles the task well. Acceleration is awesome and yet the car doesn't do anything scary--no dancing about, no threatening to jump sideways. Credit the electronic assists and the beefy Michelin Pilot Sport 2s, 265-35-ZR-19s in front, 335/30ZR20s aft.

Downshifts come quickly and cleanly, without a showy double-clutching throttle blip, since the system works without it. They've got it set to downshift for you at 1400 rpm or so, but I pull a few downshifts myself (left paddle) to make sure we get the full charge out of the slower turns. Still, I suspect we're using what would be "street mode" in the system--a track mode that was quicker to downshift might have shifted down one more gear than I did going into the Corkscrew, for instance.

Or maybe not. The car is deceptively fast, being relatively quiet inside and with such slick aero management around the cockpit, at least, that wind noise is negligible. The tires aren't loud, either, so you look down at the speedo expecting to see a two-digit number starting with 8 and find you're already over 100 mph.

Good thing this puppy can erase velocity. The brakes, six-piston monoblock calipers grabbing 15-inch Brembo CCM (carbon composite matrix) rotors are also on the Enzo level, though the particular tuning on this mule allows a bit too much pedal travel for our tastes. Getting on them hard--Turns One and Six are good places to do this early--lends credibility to Chrysler's claim that it will brake at negative 2.0 gs. You need one of the faster turns--and perhaps a bit more bravery than we can muster behind the wheel of someone else's one-off supercar--to imagine pulling lateral acceleration at the claimed 1.5 g level. I did go fast enough to sense the downforce building and car gaining stick as you went faster, though not until my second stint at the wheel. Chrysler claims 925 lbs of downforce at 186 mph (300 km/h).

As I wrote of the Enzo, this is a car with a lot more in it than I'd get out of it in one morning, but I was also like a kid when the roller-coaster comes to a stop, shouting "again!" The corkscrew will do that for you, if nothing else.

Jochen Mass seemed happy with the car's performance, which must be at the level of some IMSA GTP racers of legend.

So, is this an experience that might be made available to more than a handful of journalists lucky enough to strap into the mule? It might, says Zetsche, still. One point of having the car at the Monterey weekend is to gauge the potential market for a car of such exotic performance wearing the Chrysler brand. "If we build in units of 10, say 10 to 50 or so, it would be a very high price," he says. "If we build 500 to 1000, which is about the maximum we'd consider, it would be a lower price, of course."

And what has he to say to those who say Chrysler shouldn't be messing around in this territory, that it's too far a departure from its family-mobile strengths?

"Even though Chrysler has not much heritage in racing--it has some, but not as much as some who would be competitors for a car like this--it has more history than many, many brands have in engineering and innovation. That is what we want to be going back to and I am convinced if we make (the ME Four-Twelve) work, it will be good for the brand."


Say hello to what may the fastest car in the world
Picture 2
850hp quad-turbo AMG V12.
 
Holy crap that car is one hell of a monster. I mean the quarter mile times are some that can make some drag racers jealous. I wonder what the top speed ofthat thing really is. Looks like the Mclaren F1 finally has a run for its money.
 
:eek:
I touched the ME Four Twelve

(I got my foot on the outside of the display and reached out and 3 of my very own fingers touched a ME Four Twelve 👍 )
I took the picture at the NY auto show 2004
 
I was pissed. When I went to the Chicago Auto Show earlier this year, They had already packed up the ME412. I wanted to see that ugly piece of ****... :grumpy:
 
Event Horizon
I was pissed. When I went to the Chicago Auto Show earlier this year, They had already packed up the ME412. I wanted to see that ugly piece of ****... :grumpy:
LMAO
AS for me I dont really like this car go figure.
 
I just want to see if the production version can actually turn. That is alot of power and alot of weight.
I still believe that the Bugatti Veyron will be the best quad turbo around. That is if it makes it out sometime before 2010.
 
ND4SPD
Holy crap that car is one hell of a monster. I mean the quarter mile times are some that can make some drag racers jealous. I wonder what the top speed ofthat thing really is. Looks like the Mclaren F1 finally has a run for its money.

...If it would stay together for more then 10 minutes... :lol:
 
This exotic car is presently monstrous. I have said it once, and ill say it again, for some reason I see a little bit of Honda NSX in that car.

Its still fast and should be one hell of a rival for the Mclaren F1. The Ferrari Enzo should be the main competitor. The Enzo destroy the Mclaren in any aspect when it comes to performance beside probably acceleration and top speed.

Mclaren F1’s handling is just sad. On the skid pad it did .89 G I think, compare to exotics of today, which sucks. Even the STi do the skid pad at .88 G. Look at the Lotus Elise, it did 1.05G, which is very impressive due to the lightweight.

I hope this car can outhandle the Mclaren. In addition, I want it to pull major G in cornering.
 
The F1's handling isn't bad, the car lacks high speed stability, but yur talking reasl high speed there, it doesn't corner as well as modern supercars but the F1's 10 years old, and compared to the Lambo Diablo and co it was pretty darn good round the bends. However the F1 beat the Carrera GT which is the fastest supercar in production at the moment, sure it doesn't corner as well but it has so much more ooomph that it didn't matter and it still knocked the GT over and pissed in it's mouth.
 
I hand it to Chrysler (a non-performance car company) to come up with this kind of car, but I have to say something.

This car is quite possibly the ugliest thing in the world!!! It's just random shapes that absolutely don't meet nice at all! It's like it was designed pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey style.

Sorry if I offended anyone, but that car supremely ugly. The shape isn't even desirable...
 
live4speed
The F1's handling isn't bad, the car lacks high speed stability, but yur talking reasl high speed there, it doesn't corner as well as modern supercars but the F1's 10 years old, and compared to the Lambo Diablo and co it was pretty darn good round the bends. However the F1 beat the Carrera GT which is the fastest supercar in production at the moment, sure it doesn't corner as well but it has so much more ooomph that it didn't matter and it still knocked the GT over and pissed in it's mouth.

I was referring to the 1998 Mclaren F1, which is the last year of production I think. Anyways, it may beat the Carrera GT in straight line high speed but it loses in every other performance aspect. In a race track, im sure the GT would be a little faster. Same with the Ferrari Enzo.
 
Back