Do B-Movie makers know they're making flops?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diego440
  • 5 comments
  • 577 views

Diego440

Born to browse
Premium
Messages
12,486
Venezuela
CCS
Messages
GTP_Diego
Or do the believe their movie will really be big... if so why do they invest in them?

You know the old saw about a movie being 'like a train wreck - you can't look away'?? Well, I recently saw a B-movie that was as if a school bus ran into the train wreck and a 727 crashed on top of it and then a herd of lemmings swarmed over the smoking remains on their way to go over a cliff. And then the Jolly Green Giant picked up everything and threw it over the mountain range and into the next state.
 
Yes. The short answer.

Take this theory in mind and expand upon it. You have a set budget and a written script. You know you have to produce the script in video form for that price.

Everyone knows that you've got a low budget, and that certain things aren't going to be top notch. You wisely invest the money you have to make the final cut, but not blow it on a handful of expensive scenes.

FIgure the accounting on it. You spend $10,000 making a movie that maybe 100,000 people see. Or they rent it. (C'mon Tremors 4?!?) you make enough money to clear a profit, and start in again. YOu realize that you produced an entire movie in 3 months, and made a $30k profit. Thats 120,000 a year you're making.

Why not continue to make bad movies? Not everyone can be a Speilberg or Lucas or Howard.

Or, You're just looking for a big break.

After all, El Mariachi cost $7000, and Clerks was in the high $20k range.
 
You know the old saw about a movie being 'like a train wreck - you can't look away'?? Well, I recently saw a B-movie that was as if a school bus ran into the train wreck and a 727 crashed on top of it and then a herd of lemmings swarmed over the smoking remains on their way to go over a cliff. And then the Jolly Green Giant picked up everything and threw it over the mountain range and into the next state.

Diego, I would pay a good deal of money to see that.

The Producers is a good sendup of stage and film floppery.
 
Well you have to start somewhere I guess...You cant become a big movie maker straight away. So maybe they think yeah my movie wont be good but we will do it anyway because it will give me experience, i will have more contacts, more people will know my work etc...
 
While I would agree with DA for the most part, the majority of makers of 'straight to DVD' films are more than aware they exist to make a profit out of what they have, rather than the finest film know to man.

Some however are a little different, the one that stands head and shoulders above the rest is of course Ed Wood; Woods is an interesting enough character in himself, as his bio (taken here from Wiki) covers.

Wiki
Wood's father, Edward Sr, worked for the Postal Service and his family was relocated numerous times around the United States. Eventually, they settled in Poughkeepsie, New York where Ed Wood, Jr. was born.

During his childhood, Wood was interested in the performing arts and pulp fiction. He collected comics and pulp magazines, and adored movies, most notably Westerns and anything involving the occult. He would often skip school in favor of watching pictures at the local movie theater, at which stills from the day's movie would often be thrown in the trash by theatre staff, allowing Wood to salvage them to add to his extensive collection.

It is believed that Wood's mother Lillian always wanted a girl and sometimes dressed her son up in skirts and dresses until he was about 12 years old.[citation needed] For the rest of his life, Wood was a non-sexually oriented transvestite.

One of his first paid jobs was as a cinema usher, although he also sang and played drums in a band. He later fronted a singing quartet called Eddie Wood's Little Splinters, having learned to play a variety of string instruments. Wood was given his first movie camera on his 17th birthday: a Kodak "City Special." One of his first pieces of footage was a plane crashing to the ground, which imbued him with pride.

Wood enlisted in the Marines at age 17, just months after the Attack on Pearl Harbor. He claimed that he had participated in the Battle of Guadalcanal while secretly wearing a brassiere and panties beneath his uniform.

Fascinated by the exotic and bizarre, Wood joined a carnival after discharge from the Marines. His several missing teeth and disfigured leg (souvenirs from his time in combat) combined with personal fetishes and acting skills made him a perfect candidate for the freak show. Wood played, among others, the geek and the bearded lady. As the bearded lady, he donned women's clothing and created his own prosthetic breasts. Carnivals would be frequently depicted in Wood's works, most notably (and semi-autobiographically) in the novel Killer in Drag.

Wood's other vices included soft drugs, alcohol and sex. While he respected women and was completely faithful to his girlfriends (most notably Dolores Fuller) and wife Kathy O'Hara, he was a notorious womanizer in his younger days.

However by all accounts Woods did strive to make the best films he thought he could, despite the fact many are rated as some of the worst ever made (Plan 9 from Outer Space in particular).


Another factor can be simply the budget involved; for example many regard Heat (1995) as one of Michael Mann's finest films (myself included), with cast, perfomances and direction superbly realised. What may people are not aware of is that Mann wrote and directed a TV movie called L.A. Takedown (1989), and Heat is basically a remake of that film. With a much larger budget enabling a strong (and more talented) cast and a freedom to shot the film exactly as wanted, L.A. Takedown is transformed into Heat.

Same writer and director, and the two films 'plot-wise' are almost identical, yet Heat is in a totally different class altogether.

Regards

Scaff
 
Back