DOME F113 Prototype 2026

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gioo
  • 13 comments
  • 463 views
Messages
8
Greece
Greece
The DOME F113 (formally known as JNFP-1 when it was introduced as a prototype) comissioned by the Japanese Motor Industry Association (JMIA) and engineered by DOME, has transitioned from being a stationary prototype, to entering an active development phase for the next generation of Super Formula cars for the Super Formula championship.

Adding this car to Gran Turismo 7 does not only improve the variety of open-wheel race cars that the game has to offer, but it also has a lot of potential for the livery makers since the car is built entirely to the latest 2026 Formula 1 structural safety regulations. In other words, it allows players to make recreations of the 2026 F1 grid with teams like Red Bull, Mercedes, Mclaren, Ferrari and so on, which in turn brings more motorsport enthusiasts to play the game further enlarging the Gran Turismo community!

In conclusion, since GT7 is taking a more modern approach to the motorsport world by adding the latest GT3’s, Hypercars and circuits, the JMIA DOME F113 would be a great addition to the game to see and drive!

SPECS:
Engine: Toyota / Honda NRE (Inline-4, 2L Turbo, direct-injection)
Maximum Power: 550hp
Gearbox: 6-speed E-Shift System
Clutch System: 115mm Carbon Clutch / E-Clutch System
Fuel Tank: FIA FT5-1999, 135-liter capacity


IMG_1046.webpIMG_1007.webpIMG_1047.webpIMG_1048.webpIMG_1049.webp
 
Last edited:
The JNFP-1 (also known as JMIA DOME F113) is currently being developed as the next generation of Super Formula cars for the Super Formula championship.

Adding this car to Gran Turismo 7 does not only improve the variety of open-wheel race cars that the game has to offer, but it also allows players to make recreations of the 2026 F1 grid as it’s modeled after 2026 F1’s regulations which in turn brings more F1 fans to the game further enlarging the Gran Turismo community!
If you're suggesting this car (again) it needs to be in the Suggestions/Cars forum and with an appropriate title.

You previously did suggest it and the fact that the title wasn't appropriate was pointed out to you, but after a week and several visits to the site you made no attempt to correct it and the thread was deleted.
 
Im still new so i had no idea where to post it, thanks for the heads up i’ll go post it on the cars forum

Edit: I think i got it this time but again if there’s anything wrong with my post please let me know!
 
Last edited:
Im still new so i had no idea where to post it, thanks for the heads up i’ll go post it on the cars forum

Edit: I think i got it this time but again if there’s anything wrong with my post please let me know!
Yeah, no; there's no need for more of them. I'll move this one, but only if it's actually going to be heeded. As I say, there was no response and no attempt to correct the previous one despite over a week passing, hence its deletion.


The problem is that you say the car is the "JMIA JNFP-1" in the title, then say it's also known as the "JMIA Dome F113" in the thread. Now, I'm sure you've researched the car properly but... which is it? Why is the make "JMIA" (a loose collaboration of 40 companies, some who've never been near making a car) and not "Dome" who primarily actually constructed it and is an experienced car constructor? If it has the F113 designation, that's a Dome chassis.

I'm not saying that the thread title is wrong, per se, but this very much leaps out as a "huh?". Could you explain why you've gone for what you have?


Unlike most thread titles though, the "Prototype 2026" part is right...
 
Well i got some advice from another person and he or she told me to name the title like this, but anyway i’ll do some edits and i think we’re good to go
 
Yeah, no; there's no need for more of them. I'll move this one, but only if it's actually going to be heeded. As I say, there was no response and no attempt to correct the previous one despite over a week passing, hence its deletion.


The problem is that you say the car is the "JMIA JNFP-1" in the title, then say it's also known as the "JMIA Dome F113" in the thread. Now, I'm sure you've researched the car properly but... which is it? Why is the make "JMIA" (a loose collaboration of 40 companies, some who've never been near making a car) and not "Dome" who primarily actually constructed it and is an experienced car constructor? If it has the F113 designation, that's a Dome chassis.

I'm not saying that the thread title is wrong, per se, but this very much leaps out as a "huh?". Could you explain why you've gone for what you have?


Unlike most thread titles though, the "Prototype 2026" part is right.
I have edited it (couple of times). I think it’s more appropriate now, and meanwhile i also managed to gather a bit more information regarding the car
 
I have edited it (couple of times). I think it’s more appropriate now
I wasn't really looking for you to change things (and make them worse - it now doesn't have "Prototype" in the title, when it did before, as I flagged as being correct), but to explain why you'd chosen the things you chose:
I'm not saying that the thread title is wrong, per se, but this very much leaps out as a "huh?". Could you explain why you've gone for what you have?

Unlike most thread titles though, the "Prototype 2026" part is right...
The questions remain with these edits.

Could you, as a person who has actually researched this car, explain why the "Make" part of the title is "JMIA" - (a loose collaboration of 40 companies, some who've never been near making a car) and not "Dome" who primarily actually constructed it and is an experienced car constructor - and why Dome, who built the car is now in the "Model" part of the name, to someone who has not researched this car?
 
I wasn't really looking for you to change things (and make them worse - it now doesn't have "Prototype" in the title, when it did before, as I flagged as being correct), but to explain why you'd chosen the things you chose:

The questions remain with these edits.

Could you, as a person who has actually researched this car, explain why the "Make" part of the title is "JMIA" - (a loose collaboration of 40 companies, some who've never been near making a car) and not "Dome" who primarily actually constructed it and is an experienced car constructor - and why Dome, who built the car is now in the "Model" part of the name, to someone who has not researched this car?
Alright so, the reason why i wrote it that way, is because i searched up its official name and that’s literally how it’s called.
I thought it was called JNFP-1 but this was its name when it was still a prototype. Now that the car has started entering a development phase, they named it JMIA DOME F113. In other words, JMIA is the association which comissioned it and basically coordinated the whole process, DOME engineered it as i say in the introduction of the car, and the F113 is the name of the chassis.
 
Last edited:
In other words, JMIA is the association which comissioned it and basically coordinated the whole process, DOME engineered it as i say in the introduction of the car, and the F113 is the name of the chassis.
Okay, but how does that fit into the thread titling requirements linked to you in the previous thread?


"JMIA Dome" would be two manufacturers, not make/model.

Who commissioned it would seem entirely irrelevant to the concept of who the manufacturer is.

I thought it was called JNFP-1 but this was its name when it was still a prototype.
Unless it's out racing somewhere now (which I assume is not the case), it is not a finished vehicle. That means it is either a concept or a prototype. Again, the pinned thread gives you guidance on this: concepts are largely not functional, prototypes may be functional and more closely resemble the final vehicle.

That's why I said that "the "Prototype 2026" part is right..." in my previous post, before you removed it.

The pinned threads exist so that these conversations aren't necessary.
 
Okay, but how does that fit into the thread titling requirements linked to you in the previous thread?


"JMIA Dome" would be two manufacturers, not make/model.

Who commissioned it would seem entirely irrelevant to the concept of who the manufacturer is.

Unless it's out racing somewhere now (which I assume is not the case), it is not a finished vehicle. That means it is either a concept or a prototype. Again, the pinned thread gives you guidance on this: concepts are largely not functional, prototypes may be functional and more closely resemble the final vehicle.

That's why I said that "the "Prototype 2026" part is right..." in my previous post, before you removed it.

The pinned threads exist so that these conversations aren't necessary.
My bad i forgot to adress this, they started testing it too on Fuji
 
My bad i forgot to adress this, they started testing it too on Fuji
That... doesn't answer or resolve anything.
 
That... doesn't answer or resolve anything.
I misunderstood your reply, anyways so should i remove the “JMIA” from the name and add the Prototype again?
 
I misunderstood your reply, anyways so should i remove the “JMIA” from the name and add the Prototype again?
I mean, the Prototype part definitely:
Unlike most thread titles though, the "Prototype 2026" part is right...
... but the rest of it, I don't know. That's literally the point: I'm asking you, the person who researched this car before making this thread, to explain how your research has led you to title it the way you have, to someone who hasn't researched the car, and how it fits with our titling requirements in the pinned thread (which exists so we don't have to have this conversation every time for every car suggestion).

To someone who hasn't researched the car, it looks like the title goes:

Make Make Model Year

You can't have two makes, so intuitively this looks wrong. You need to explain why you've done it like that or correct it so it meets our requirements.

The onus is on you to get it right, not anyone else to do it for you.
 
I mean, the Prototype part definitely:

... but the rest of it, I don't know. That's literally the point: I'm asking you, the person who researched this car before making this thread, to explain how your research has led you to title it the way you have, to someone who hasn't researched the car, and how it fits with our titling requirements in the pinned thread (which exists so we don't have to have this conversation every time for every car suggestion).

To someone who hasn't researched the car, it looks like the title goes:

Make Make Model Year

You can't have two makes, so intuitively this looks wrong. You need to explain why you've done it like that or correct it so it meets our requirements.

The onus is on you to get it right, not anyone else to do it for you.
I never told anyone to correct it for me but anyways. Now that you said it i have understood my mistake on this and i will get it right.
(JMIA was just the one promoting and organizing the whole project and DOME is the one who actually manufactured the car so I’ll remove JMIA from the title and keep the DOME)
 
Last edited:
Back