Focus RS is a winner

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stotty
  • 192 comments
  • 14,182 views

Stotty

My other car's a Porsche
Premium
Messages
8,642
United Kingdom
London
Messages
GTP_Stotty
From Autocar...
The big question, of course, is whether Ford really has managed to develop a front suspension system that enables the RS to deploy its 301bhp and 324lb ft without feeling like an unguided Exocet missile. And we’re glad to report that the answer is a resounding, faintly befuddled “you bet”.

What happens when you select second gear and give it full beans in the RS frankly feels like some form of miracle, because even on a rough or wet surface the car takes off without drama, feeling for all the world as if it is four, not two-wheel drive. Considering how much raw thrust there is – Ford claims 0-60mph in 5.9sec, 0-100mph in 14sec dead and a top speed of 163mph – it’s quite weird to begin with. You even wonder whether they’re fibbing about how many wheels are being driven.

In the event this is just one of many tricks which the extraordinary new Focus RS has up its sleeve. What we are talking about is a car that really does shred the rule book on front-wheel-drive dynamics, but one that’s also civilised and well mannered enough to live with every day.

And when you do go for it, do not expect to be disappointed. Even with as little as 1800rpm showing it goes, and goes hard, in all of the first five gears. In sixth you need to wait until just over 2000rpm before the whirlwind of torque begins to blow you, and then throw you, towards the horizon.

If anything the Focus RS feels faster than the raw numbers suggest, partly because of the huge wallop of torque so low down, but also because of the noise. It really is a key part in the transformation from relatively humble ST to altogether more meaningful RS. The same can’t quite be said about the gearchange, unfortunately, which is shorter and sharper than the ST’s but not short or sharp enough to do the rest of the drivetrain justice.

On the other hand, the chassis more than makes up for this most minor of issues. With the previous RS Ford may have dropped a whoopsy on the finance front, but it also made one of the sharpest handling front-wheel-drive cars there has ever been. It has gone at least one, if not two steps better this time round.

The way the RS puts its grunt down is truly incredible, but beyond that it’s also a lovely car to hussle along a good road. The steering is just delicious in the way it telegraphs so clearly what’s happening beneath the fat Continental front tyres. Yet it’s what happens at the other end of the car that provides you with the biggest confidence booster. The way in which the car neither under nor oversteers, but just hangs on is, well, breathtaking.

Should I buy one?
In a word, yes. Remortgage the house, rob a bank, sell yourself, sell your own grandmother, just do whatever it takes to put an RS on your drive. Because it really is one of those cars.


Focus RS.jpg

Seems 300bhp, 324lb ft and FWD can be made to work. I just love the way this car looks too... like a WRC Focus with no sponsor decals.

Can't wait to see a group test of Focus RS v Megane R26 v WRX sti v Evo v R32, v S3.
 
I did tell you that the Focus RS was lapping Ford's Lommel #7 test track faster than the similarly-powered Evo and Impreza variants...
 
I also heard a rumour that it was very close a sub 8 minute lap round the 'Ring.
 
I also heard a rumour that it was very close a sub 8 minute lap round the 'Ring.

I didn't even know it had been there :lol:

I just asked and was told "All I got was a smug grin and 'Faster than the Evo and pretzel'."

:lol:
 
The guy who wrote the above review for Autocar (Steve Sutcliffe) was at a private Ford test at the 'Ring last autumn. He said at the time that it would redefine what FWD cars are capable of.

Edit:

Autocar now have a video up... haven't listened to the commentary yet as I'm at work, but I watched a bit and the front splitter looks incredibly low. In fact the entire car looks very low.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/VideosWallpapers/Videos.aspx?AR=238360&CT=V
 
Last edited:
if I'd be rich, I'd want that in my life. then, I would test how much it really CAN handle.. :trouble:
 
Does this make four or five threads about the car now floating around on here?

Because apparently all the buzz buzz about this car is about the power and how the front wheels handle it, does anybody know just how good it is to drive on a twisty road? The article mentions that it is a great drive on the handling front, but only does so in a sentence or two while the rest of the article is just about straight line speed. So you kind of get the impression that the handling just isn't that impressive.

And that kind of goes against the idea of a hot hatch, where you could write for pages on the handling and how much of a joy it is to drive while only tacking on a simple "Oh, and it accelerates very nicely too" at the end.

So how does it compare on the feel front to a GTI? Is it like the Astra VXR where it'll blow the thing away on a straight, and post better numbers all around but be the most difficult thing to drive or like the Renaultsport thing where it is faster all around but also feels great to drive?
 
It's not exactley an in depth article, it didn't go into anything in depth at all. Everyone says it can handle well, so I'd hazzard a guess that it does, but if you want to read that in more depth and so on then there will be plenty of road tests coming that will do that and I'm sure we'll see it on TopGear next season.
 
Well... The 'Ring is a pretty twisty, bumpy road. Ford's Lommel #7 is a very, very twisty road indeed. And the ST is quicker than the Evo/Impreza models with the same crank power around each.

So... I wouldn't worry about how well it goes on twisties.
 
I've just watched JP test this motor on Fifth Gear tonight. Didn't really interest me that much, just a heads up for you.

At £25k, I can think of better wheels to buy!
 
I've just watched JP test this motor on Fifth Gear tonight. Didn't really interest me that much, just a heads up for you.

At £25k, I can think of better wheels to buy!

Interestingly, someone else has just told me that they watched the Fifth Gear review by the normally useless Jason Potato, and said the conclusion was pretty much the same as this article from the Times.

Which is pretty glowing...
 
Because apparently all the buzz buzz about this car is about the power and how the front wheels handle it, does anybody know just how good it is to drive on a twisty road?

Even more funny is that there have already been three 300+ BHP sedans made available before it, all of which out-accelerate the little Ford to 60 MPH:

2008.chevrolet.impala.20115718-E.jpg


2007.pontiac.grand%20prix.20119971-E.jpg


2009.buick.lacrosse.20237870-E.jpg


...Although the Pontiac was the only one that could actually handle pretty well...

=======---------================----------

Still, impressive performance numbers. But, as always, a shame that we won't see it here.
 
Especially compared to big American FWD sedans that are roughly the size of the Vauxhall VXR8, and weigh about the same too.
 
Easy to find launch traction if you have the weight to press the car down into the ground.

I can't wait to see this car in person... though it's very unlikely I ever will... sounds epic.
 
Those acceleration times on the Focus do seem a little low.

That was one of my first thoughts, considering that my car should do it in 6.2s, give or take, with much less torque...On the other hand, torque is probably the problem here. :lol:
 
Easy to find launch traction if you have the weight to press the car down into the ground.
I did some investigating:
Same acceleration times as the original Cobalt SS.
Slower than the original SRT-4.
Considerably slower than the current Cobalt SS.
Ford has to be sandbagging those times.
 
Last edited:
It'll depend. It might do 5.6 on a nice, warm day on the drag-strip, but they're likely quoting what you might get on the road. Most powerful front-drivers struggle to get under 6 seconds without a drag-specific set-up

300 hp doesn't matter that much in the 0-60 department... It matters for 0-100 mph more. What counts more for a quick 0-60 time is having lots of torque and having enough grip to put it down to the ground, and having gearshifts at very strategic intervals. I wouldn't be surprised if part of the reason it isn't faster is because you have to shift into 3rd for 60.... sacrificing outright 0-60 times for shorter gearing for track work.
 
To be honest 0-anything is a bit fruitless both in the real world and on FWD cars (I have 3 FWD cars, so don't take this as a slight on FWDers). Comparing the RS's 0-60mph time to three... well... barges kinda misses the point.

This is a car built to be the best handling FWD car ever made, with enough power to make the handling count. It's made to beat the Evo and Impreza point to point, while undercutting both, without resorting to 4WD. The three 300hp sedans posted might stand a chance light-to-light, but if that's all you're interested in you're a retard for buying a FWD car in the first place.
 
Exactly. I've mentioned it before, but 0-60 certainly isn't the be-all and end-all of performance. That the Focus RS would probably destroy any of the FWD cars mentioned so far on in-gear and through the gears performance and certainly accelerating out of a corner is much more relevant to quick driving. From the Autocar vid posted elsewhere it was pretty impressive watching how quickly it bombed out of hairpins considering how much torque is going through the front wheels.
 
0-60 times are completely irrelevant... who actually gives their car 6,000rpm+ then dumps the clutch and follows this up with a flat shift to 2nd on a regular basis? Real world performance is about in-gear acceleration times... how quickly a car overtakes and accelerates out of corners.

Plato was heaping praise on the RS on 5th gear last night... and doesn't really matter if people consider him a good motoring journolist or not, his driving ability is well respected.

Oh, and it looked terrible in green.


if that's all you're interested in you're a retard for buying a FWD car in the first place.

LMFAO
 
Not too bad, but I like the colours that stand out a little more. The car is mental, you may as well get it in a mental colour! Would you get a Porsche 997 GT3 in black, or bright orange? :lol:
 
Not too bad, but I like the colours that stand out a little more. The car is mental, you may as well get it in a mental colour! Would you get a Porsche 997 GT3 in black, or bright orange? :lol:

I'd have my GT3RS in white... so it looks like a GT3 Cup racer with no sponsor decals. Though I have seen one in black with a film on it to make it look matt... Orange graphic and wheels. Looked like the dogs dangly bits...

c214748364819102008232651_3.jpg


c214748364819102008232651_4.jpg


Now that to me is automotive porn.

The big problem with wild colours is they attract both the rozzers and chavs in Corsa's (complete 1.2 engines and 4" exhuasts). The chavs I can just about put up with, but the rozzers I can do without having been up to 9 points twice and 15 once. The 15 points were courtesy of a Impreza Series McRae in mica blue with gold speedlines... couldn't drive the thing without getting pulled up.
 
Last edited:
Back