Ford selling jaguar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poverty
  • 44 comments
  • 2,667 views

Poverty

(Banned)
Messages
3,567
FORD WEIGHS DRASTIC MOVES

As 2nd-quarter loss soars to $254M, automaker looks at alliances, sale of assets

Bryce G. Hoffman and Christine Tierney / The Detroit News

DEARBORN -- Facing pressure from its board and Wall Street, Ford Motor Co. has hired a mergers-and-acquisitions expert to study whether it should sell underperforming brands such as Jaguar, form an alliance with another major automaker or make other large-scale strategic moves.

Kenneth Leet, 48, a former investment banker for Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, will report to Chairman and CEO Bill Ford Jr.

Leet has been charged with "exploring a broad range of strategic alternatives," the company said Wednesday. While Ford did not elaborate, people familiar with the situation said the review will explore assets sales and possible alliances.

The announcement of Leets' appointment came the same day Ford was forced to restate its second-quarter financial results, doubling its loss to $254 million, and warn that its Premier Automotive Group -- which includes Jaguar and other European luxury brands -- will lose money in 2006.

Ford launched a North American turnaround plan in January that called for plant closures and job cuts, but a rapid shift away from pickups and SUVs has severely undermined the effort. Ford has pledged to speed up the plan.

In an e-mail to employees Wednesday, Bill Ford said the North American turnaround remains the top priority but that he "will continue to evaluate the rapidly changing landscape of our industry and review the best ways in which we should adjust."

He added: "Contrary to speculation, nothing has been decided and we will not rush to judgments."

Some Ford board members are concerned about the pace of Ford's turnaround effort and worry that a possible tie-up between rival General Motors Corp. and Nissan Motor Co.-Renault SA could leave Ford vulnerable in the rapidly evolving global automotive industry, according to people familiar with the situation.

Leet decision was Bill Ford's

Ford spokesman Tom Hoyt stressed that the decision to hire Leet was made by Bill Ford in consultation with the board.

"Bill and Ken have had a long relationship," Hoyt said, noting Leet once headed the Ford account at Goldman Sachs.

As the strategic review progresses, the Ford family could be forced to reassess its role in the company founded by Henry Ford. The family, led by Bill Ford, has held a 40 percent controlling stake in the automaker for the past 50 years through its Class B super-voting shares. But mergers experts say the size of the stake could be an impediment to forming a major alliance with another automaker.

"Ford will not be able to do some of the things it needs to do as long as the family maintains its control of the company," said veteran auto analyst John Casesa of New York's Casesa Shapiro Group LLC. "It's an issue the family needs to confront now."

Ford officials dismiss the notion that the family control is blocking potential mergers, pointing out its various alliances and joint ventures around the world. But they haven't expressly ruled out changes in the ownership structure.

The knowledge that Ford is open to an alliance puts additional pressure on GM as it begins its own talks with Nissan-Renault -- particularly since many analysts see an alliance between Nissan-Renault and Ford as a more promising alternative.

Renault and Nissan's CEO Carlos Ghosn approached Ford more than a year ago about a possible tie-up, but was told the Dearborn automaker would not consider any deal that required the Ford family to cede its controlling stake in the company, according to people familiar with the situation.

Ghosn open to deal

In July, Ghosn told The Detroit News that he is open to considering other alliances if a merger with GM fails to gel. A person familiar with the GM-Renault-Nissan negotiations said Ghosn has never ruled out a deal with Ford. However, the person said there is an understanding in investment banking circles that no one will deal with Ford unless the family agrees to dilute its voting rights to 20 percent and hires an experienced CEO to take over day-to-day running of the company from Bill Ford.

One of Leet's first priorities will be assessing the future of Jaguar Cars Ltd. Ford acquired Jaguar in 1989 for $2.6 billion but has been unable to make the British luxury brand profitable. In December, Ford was forced to spend $2.09 billion to bolster the brand.

"It's time to figure out what we are going to do about some of these brands," a Ford official told The News.

While Wall Street analysts welcomed the idea of Ford shedding Jaguar, they say more substantive changes are needed to fix Ford's domestic automobile business.

"Is selling Jaguar going to fix your problems in North America? I don't think so. The cash is nice, but they don't need it," said Bradley Rubin of BNP Paribas. "They don't need an alliance (either). They need to solve their own problems. They need to close the factories faster, open the attrition program to all employees and stop selling cars to the daily rental fleet market."

Ford has outlined a plan to shutter 14 factories and eliminate some 30,000 factory jobs over the next six years. While Ford has taken a more targeted approach to downsizing, GM has already managed to eliminate 34,000 U.S. hourly workers through buyouts.

'Desperate times'

"Desperate times call for desperate measures -- especially when GM is taking them," said Robert Barry of Goldman Sachs. "We think Ford's core challenges are unsustainably high (North American) market share given the competitive landscape, a relatively less competitive (North American) product lineup, and onerous legacy liabilities. We have doubts a strategic review or alliance can have a material impact, especially in the near- to medium-term."

Bill Ford says he knows the company needs to move faster and has promised to provide details of an accelerated restructuring plan and additional cost-cutting moves within the next couple of months.

The second quarter took Ford by surprise. Rising gas prices and interest rates forced a tectonic shift in the North American vehicle market away from gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and full-size pickups toward more economical cars and car-based crossovers. Ford had braced itself for the drop in SUV sales, but the sharp decline in its bread-and-butter large pickups caught the company off-guard.

Ford also may review options for its Ford Motor Credit, its profitable finance arm. GM has sold a controlling interest in GMAC, its captive finance unit, to raise cash and lower borrowing costs. However, that appears to be lower on the list than other options.

"Ford Motor Credit Co. is a strategic asset to Ford that generates solid profits and dividends," Bill Ford told employees.

Though most analysts agree that Ford's problem is not a lack of cash, its financial woes have undermined the credit rating of Ford Credit, forcing it to borrow money at a stiff premium. That means Ford makes less money on the cars and trucks it finances.

Investors welcomed the news of Leet's appointment. Ford shares rose 38 cents, or 5.8 percent, to $6.96 Wednesday. They have fallen 9.8 percent this year.

BMW rumoured to be interested, as well as TVR.
 
Jaguars nowadays are just like Jaguars have always been. Posh, good looking, refined and unreliable. Don't see that as changing, whoever buys it, but I hope the next owner will kill the X-Type. :lol:
 
I personally would rather see Jaguar become an independent company once again, but there obviously aren't funds for that.

Let TVR get ahold of them, and crazy stuff might happen. Let BMW get ahold of them and they will get thrown to the ground and left to die.
 
Maybe the Chinese would be interested? :D

I also would like to see Jag become independent again, but I don't see that happening.
 
I'm thinking BMW might make the most of it... do they have a hold of Daimler? I could see big Jags being based on 5 and 7 series cars but priced upmarket... but otherwise... nah.

VAG maybe? They would probably love to have another FR platform to articulate with Bentley and possibly Lambo. That one could work.
 
Just as long as their plan for a whole new line-up for 2010 still goes ahead as planned, I won't need to worry. I read up about it in Autocar magaizne - sounds very interesting. Though, it didn't mention they were in trouble, so plans could very well change.

I'd say BMW owning them is a better bet than TVR. I have no clue what TVR would do if they were to purchase... Also, I doubt they could take the hit if Jaguar were to flop in their arms as they aren't flooded with with money in the first place.
 
I read somewhere that Hyundai might also be interested...
Ironic how Ford outbid GM for Jag all those years ago, but now that Jag might be on the market again, GM is in just as bad a shape as Ford.
 
You think BMW wants to take a risk with another British company though? After the Rover fiasco, I would think that they would be more subdued. But I'm rather surprised that Ford is contemplating selling Jag. They've sunk, what, billions of dollars into it, not counting the Formula 1 team.
L8 Apex
Ironic how Ford outbid GM for Jag all those years ago, but now that Jag might be on the market again, GM is in just as bad a shape as Ford.
Except, Ford is still to pigheaded to change anything that got them there.
 
niky
Jaguars nowadays are just like Jaguars have always been. Posh, good looking, refined and unreliable. Don't see that as changing, whoever buys it, but I hope the next owner will kill the X-Type. :lol:

Umm, you are aware that Jaguar has one of the highest J.D Power and Associates reliability ratings in the industry, right? Jags are far from unreliable these days.
 
Jaguar under the wings of VAG wouldn't be horrible, as it has worked out well for Bentley (IMO). But given how close Jaguar and Aston Martin have become in recent years, I really wouldn't want to break that couple up.
 
I have to agree. VAG could probably bring them back.
And we all know they have the money to support Jaguar if they can support a 253Mph supercar that makes no profit.
Jaguar also doesn't seem to pose a threat to any of its companies it owns. Lamborghini is a much different area and would compete with Porsche. Volkswagen isn't exactly Jaguar-luxury style, and Jaguar isn't exactly Bentley-style.
So I could only see Jaguar competing with Audi.

Either way, I would totally support VAG buying Jaguar.
 
fangorn_forest
Umm, you are aware that Jaguar has one of the highest J.D Power and Associates reliability ratings in the industry, right? Jags are far from unreliable these days.

Well, last I'd heard is that they managed to sort almost everything out on the S-Type, but there are still some niggling problems elsewhere. That's actually good to know, and it might encourage a quick sale.
 
niky
Well, last I'd heard is that they managed to sort almost everything out on the S-Type, but there are still some niggling problems elsewhere. That's actually good to know, and it might encourage a quick sale.
Yes, I'd say that's true. The one our parents bought - a 2004 facelifted a model I must point out, so it's the latest - did have one or two problems: the sunglasses box kept poping over bumps, and there was a loud-ish knocking noise coming from under the car. Thankfully, Jaguar sorted the knocking out after looking at it 3 times under warranty. Other than that, they look and feel very well made. I've never been in a car before without any squeeks or rattles.
 
*McLaren*


Either way, I would totally support VAG buying Jaguar.
If VAG buys Jaguar I will personally kill each and every person who made that happen.

Every single US VAG brand is ALREADY premium. The last thing they need is another. And why would BMW be interested in buying another British carmaker? I'm sure people there remember Rover.
 
On the other hand, I've heard no 'plaints about my uncle's XJR (I drool everytime I see this one... Gads, I wish I knew where they kept the keys...), but then, there's always this:

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money-savers/article.html?in_article_id=411365&in_page_id=5

Nice to know that the S-Type is at least tied with BMW... but given BMW's current reliability problems with regards to electronics, that's still so-so.

And the X-Type is just way down there. Stupid move downmarket, seriously. Great for what it is, a luxurized Ford Mondeo with better engines, but just not Jaguar, and not exclusive enough to be a Jaguar.
 
TVR wouldn't buy Jaguar, Nikolai Smolenski on the other hand might. As a second company, if he took over you can be sure there would be changes, if BMW took over you can be sure that anything good that wouwork on a BMW the Jagaur has, will end up on a BMW and Jaguar will be left to die, they will not be built to compete with BMW's cars.
 
If BMW brought jaguar, they would probably stick them on BMW chassis' but soften them up for uber luxury to go head and head with MB. I dont think jaguar would have anything to offer BMW otherwise.

As for smolenski he would have to get in partner or something along those lines because he wouldnt be able to afford jaguar, which is why im surprised people are mentioning his name.
 
He could get them. He already owns two motor companies and ontop of all his assets he personally has over 100,000,000 pounds in his bank accounts. It wouldn't be hard for him to get it done through a bank.
 
Yeah but then theres the cost of developing, and day to day running of the factories, if it didnt work out it could ruin him.
 
Yeah, it could, most businesses can ruin their owners if they don't work out. That's a risk they have to weigh up before starting. But I don't think he'd take on something as big as Jaguar at this point in time.
 
live4speed
TVR wouldn't buy Jaguar, Nikolai Smolenski on the other hand might. As a second company, if he took over you can be sure there would be changes, if BMW took over you can be sure that anything good that wouwork on a BMW the Jagaur has, will end up on a BMW and Jaguar will be left to die, they will not be built to compete with BMW's cars.
Could Smolenski even afford it? Ford paid 2 billion for Jag when it was a dump box manafacturer in the 80's. How much must it be worth today.
 
Toronado
Could Smolenski even afford it? Ford paid 2 billion for Jag when it was a dump box manafacturer in the 80's. How much must it be worth today.
Not with his personal money, but it's not often that someone will go out and buy a company with his own money. Basically he's got enough money and assets of his own to get the investment, or loan he'd need to buy Jag. However, I really don't see him going for it, because Jagaur is a pretty big project to take on, TVR isn't exactley leaving him all his weekends off if you know what I mean.
 
Why would BMW buy a company that it actually competes with , X-Type Vs 3 series , S type Vs 5 series , XJ Vs 7 ....ect , and BMW already competes with MB so it doesn't need to buy a company to do that
 
well in germany and england BMW and MB customers are very different. MB customers buy theyre cars for the reputation of unrivalled comfort, and BMW's for unrivalled handling.

Jaguar could be positioned to be MB fighter, as because of right now I dont think under fords ruling jaguar is making propper jaguars. Jaguars are supposed to be uber luxury, and right now theyre not.
 
ultrabeat
I hope to God you're joking...

Proton owns Lotus, and they haven't ruined it yet. Thank them for the fact that Lotus is actually delivering stateside now. :lol:

Hyundai (except for CEO-related scandals) is in a good position right now, and they're hungry enough and ambitious enough to give Jaguar a kick for development, instead of having it compete with a veritable galaxy of other sub-brands for money and development personnel.
 
Poverty
well in germany and england BMW and MB customers are very different. MB customers buy theyre cars for the reputation of unrivalled comfort, and BMW's for unrivalled handling.
This is actually quite true, at least in England from what I've seen, BMW and Mercedes buyers are quite different.
 
Back