Freaking infuriating!

  • Thread starter Dravonic
  • 10 comments
  • 970 views
2,796
Brazil
São Paulo
Dravonic
Disclaimer: torrents are a method of data distribution, this threads aims to discuss the torrent system, not files that may or may not be legally distributed by it.

Rant bellow, read at your own discretion.



I came across a torrent with a hostile peer. Damn asshole. I've downloaded 1.5GBs of data of which 577MBs were hashfails. In all my years of torrenting that was the first time it happened.

It doesn't help that the dumbass who made the torrent did so with 4MB pieces, making it all that much easier for the asshole to screw the whole swarm. It's a freaking 3GB torrent dude, you can easily use a piece size four times smaller ffs!

It never crossed my mind how easy it was to achieve such a thing. Just send tiny pieces of trash to a lot of people and watch the whole system crumble. What I can't get of my mind is why would anyone even do such a thing. If you're dumbass who wants to feel like a hacker there so many other more fun things you can do. This is so passive, nothing is accomplished, how this can be satisfying to a person is just beyond me. But then again, some people just love acting like assholes.

Has this ever happened to anyone around here? Should the bittorrent protocol suffer modifications to help dealing with this? Considering how rare this is I don't think so, but I was really surprised at how easily this can be done. That alone might be reason enough for a change.
 
Last edited:
If that was the case he should be easily banned by my torrent client. Its not like it doesn't even try to find the bad peers. It keeps track of all the peers and therefore can recognize to a certain point when someone is sending too much bad data. It's when the guy gets sneaky that the problems arise.
 
Considering that this is a rage thread about a torrent, I think this is pretty appropriate:
rickcoolstory.jpg
 
So I gave this further thought and it turns out I've probably been raging at the wrong person.

Because of the way torrents work, if someone, lets say, downloads a music file (a totally legally obtainable by torrent one, mind you) and then lets his itunes or windows media player fiddle around with the Artists, Album or whatever tags, then the file will be altered. As long as the file name remains unchanged, his bittorrent client won't notice the file was altered and will seed it like it was new. However, when my bittorrent client receives this altered data and calculates the hash it obviously won't mach, causing the piece to be discarded.

So most likely my problem wasn't one asshole, but actually a bunch of dumbasses.
 
I thought we weren't supposed to speak of torrents on this forum... :indiff:

Torrents aren't illegal, you can download 100% legal files with them. Same goes with any other file sharing software, it's not the files, it's the content that's questionable.
 
Considering that this is a rage thread about a torrent, I think this is pretty appropriate:
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1511/rickcoolstory.jpg

Irony.

That aside, it really is easy for some people to just mess up things because they don't understand how any of it works. Especially those that just have all their music lumped into one folder that iTunes manages.

I thought we weren't supposed to speak of torrents on this forum... :indiff:

Considering they are completely legal and an often used means to distribute free content, there isn't an issue. Hell, Blizzard's World of Warcraft updater is a torrent. Saves bandwidth and costs to the initial host and often time for the downloaders since they can pull from more sources at once.
 
He used 4MB chunks because that is the best for that file you want about 800~1200 chunks to a torrent.

I use torrents all the time to download linux distros to try.
 
Back