Fuel? + Tyre Blowouts!!!

[XplodS]

THERE SHOULD BE A FUEL GAUGE!! AND A FUEL FILL UP AT PITS!!! AND TYRE BLOWOUTS!!!!!!! NOW HOW BLOODLY COOL WHOULD THAT BE??? AND CAR DAMAGE AND U GOTTA PAY FOR YA REPAIRS!!

 

[Frustrated Palm]

Once again, no. Why fuel? There probably wont be enough races long enough to make one. Car damage is stupid anyway. If its light damage I dont mind, but Im not paying for it...

 

[Nismo GT-R]

Everyone knows there will never be damage in a GT game, now why start stupid topics like this about it?

 

[Zembla]

And there shouldn't be no caps lock on puters...

<Z>

 

[F1man]

AND TURN OFF THE CAPS LOCK!!

I like your ideas besides paying for the damage repairs. Welcome to GTPlanet!

 

[Flinx]

Originally posted by Nismo GT-R
Everyone knows there will never be damage in a GT game, now why start stupid topics like this about it?

ever played GT 2?
there was an option to enable damage in arcade mode, unfortunately no visible damage but at least damage.

Originally posted by F1man
I like your ideas besides paying for the damage repairs. Welcome to GTPlanet!

if you don´t like to pay for damage repairs, better avoid damage at.

come on guys,
this should be the real driving simulator, so no bad to include a bit more features as in real life.

 

[camaro454]

tire

 

[Scottydont]

Bloody pussys we want a game that is realistic of caorse there should be fuel and blowouts people have lost the plot XplodS is bringing up some gr8 ideas for the game dont keep saying no to everything its cheapies like you who make the games crap.

 

[miata13B]

Originally posted by Scottydont
Bloody pussys we want a game that is realistic of caorse there should be fuel and blowouts people have lost the plot XplodS is bringing up some gr8 ideas for the game dont keep saying no to everything its cheapies like you who make the games crap.

But the fact of the matter has been discussed over and over again here I can't describe what has been said. Polyphony and the car manufactures are not going to A. pay for it, B. want to be represented by it, and C. are not going to have it. The fuel possibly in the future, the tires it should if you don't pit, possible I don't think so. Damage on car models; no dealer wants their beautiful cars that are representing them to look ugly. That is the bottom line on that. Remember, Video games are a new wave in marketting products.

 

[XplodS]

Just makin the game more realistic

 

[Scottydont]

you bloody tip top bloke, mate i understand that but get over all the implications we are not making the ame we are giving awareness of what we want so the makers of the game can have an idea and yes its a marketing scandle but the more realistic the more buyers they will get

 

[miata13B]

Originally posted by XplodS
Just makin the game more realistic

Trust me, I wish all listed can happen. . . Plus more, engine swaps, different manufactures of mods, weather effects, time changes, etc. The list can go on, until the point where I load the game, get online to race whomever and I think I am driving in real life. I am more stating what is going to happen over what we wish. In a perfect world, I agree 100%, but I don't want to get my hopes up for something that is not going to happen.

 

[Frustrated Palm]

If it was light damage, like battle damage you get from bumping into other cars, side scraping, etc. I am for it. Big damage, no. People would just turn around and head full speed for the AI. Plus they cant make a visible Damage model. As said in someone's sig that was quoting one of the producers. They had tested a damage model and that maybe 80% of all crashes in GT would cause the cars to break up into peices maybe 2 inches big. The damage model in GT2 was a joke (they said it was bad themselves)...

 

[NeoEllis5355]

Did someone say, tire blowout?

Nope, dont want it.