Gear Ratios: Trick Tuning???

  • Thread starter Thread starter XGT Taipan
  • 3 comments
  • 1,273 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
643
I have a major problem.

For last weeks Tuning Comp I entered a setup, and I have no idea how to recreate it, and I'm affraid that neither will the judges.

My setup was:

Code:
Transmission
Gear Ratios
1st: 5.122
2nd: 3.703
3rd: 2.828
4th: 2.258
5th: 1.884
6th: 1.487
7th: -
Final Gear: 2.900

Autoset: 1

But standard min>max is...

Code:
Transmission
Gear Ratios
1st: 3.397 > 4.228
2nd: 2.456 > 3.036
3rd: 1.875 > 2.237
4th: 1.497 > 1.733
5th: 1.249 > 1.403
6th: 0.986 > 1.188
7th: -
Final Gear: 2.900

Autoset: 1

How do I bring the drive of each gear UP so that I can recreate the first diagram?

Edit: Sorry guys, I did search, but had no idea that this is what you call the 'Tranny Trick'. Sorry again for wasting your time, Mod's, can this please be deleted or closed? Thanks
 
Found it:
move final drive to 2.700, THEN move auto to 2, THEN move auto to 1, THEN move final drive to 2.900.
1st : 4.676 - 5.819
2nd : 3.380 - 4.179
3rd : 2.582 - 3.079
4th : 2.051 - 2.386
5th : 1.719 - 1.932
6th : 1.358 - 1.635

but are you really really sure this is the gear you use? Because it seem the top speed is very low.
 
Found it:
move final drive to 2.700, THEN move auto to 2, THEN move auto to 1, THEN move final drive to 2.900.
1st : 4.676 - 5.819
2nd : 3.380 - 4.179
3rd : 2.582 - 3.079
4th : 2.051 - 2.386
5th : 1.719 - 1.932
6th : 1.358 - 1.635

but are you really really sure this is the gear you use? Because it seem the top speed is very low.

Yeh, it's set for Autumn Ring. That was the Competition, I didn't use any NA tuning because it didn't need it.

But if you read this in my first:

Edit: Sorry guys, I did search, but had no idea that this is what you call the 'Tranny Trick'. Sorry again for wasting your time, Mod's, can this please be deleted or closed? Thanks

You will see that I found what I was looking for, but thanks for looking for it for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back