Grand Valley VS. Seattle Circuit.

  • Thread starter Thread starter to_fu101
  • 14 comments
  • 479 views

Which one do u like better?

  • Total voters
    17
T

to_fu101

Messages
81
Which of the two do u like better. I personally like Grand Valley better. The Course is just better (to me). BUT....i also like seattle so don't think i put this thread/poll to get down on seattle. SO VOTE AND GIVE YOUR OPINIONS!!!!
 
Really a hard decision, i like both tracks. Before Seattle appears in GT2, i always play Grand Valley with my friends, but after GT2, we just love Seattle so much. It is a course that has fast section and tight corners. Need to have a good setup, but Grand Valley is a relatively fast cirucit, most are fast corners.
 
LoudMusic
Jumps are bad, mmmmkay?

And drifting is over rated.
Click to expand...

I hope you're joking

I like Grand Valley best personally. But there are some great sections of seattle that if you can drift them look very cool.
 
I personaly like the grand valley course because i can use an underpowered car and drift easily without letting of the pedal :)
 
You know...this is just my opnion so...

Both have their strenghs and flaws... both are good for what they present and one has something the other can't. Both are preaty good, I really can't decicde becuase pratice and racing (and drifting) has been done on both as far as I can tell (maybe a bit more on Grand Valley...)... it really depends... I'm more used to Grand Valley but I can still pull off some preaty good drfits in Seattle as well...

Seattle to me is a challenging course with a lot of turns, a lot of them blind but at the same time strangley enough visible (then again this is just me, the memmory of all the track from GT-1-3 are hammered in my brain...I could attack them all in my dreams if by chance I just hapened to think about it... no Initial D refrence intended in case anyone asks...not that that would be a bad thing right?...)... you learn things on there, in a sense you would learn on ANY other track...even Test Course with super long straits that I'd figure would still not be long enough, even though it's much, much LONGER compared to the test course in GT-1/2.

Grand Valley is the same case, it has it's ups and downs, it has some preaty good turns and an overall test of car and driver ability. It's the same for Seattle and just about every other course.

Nearly all the courses in GT3 (or the entire GT serries) are good courses to drift on, each one reuqireing no less of the driver and car.

So the way I see it, I can't really decicde, I could say one of the other and later change my mind...but I've just got this feeling Grand Valley is going to be chosen a bit more than the other... but that's just me...


Till later...
 
Grand Valley is the "grand" track... it's big and has many types of turns...

Seattle Circuit is another good track... it's alot more tech than GV

:dunce:
 
I'm better at Seattle Circuit, so it got my vote. I didn't drive Grand Valley much until recently. I like it a lot, though. I could probably become better on GV than SC with some practice.

I really enjoy coming up the hills on SC, though. I always try to drift uphill on the final turn. I also try to drift coming up the overpass before you reach the stadium. The replay doesn't seem to have a good camera angle for those spots, though. :indiff:
 
who voted for seattle circuit! >=[

haha. jk. grand valley is more fun... it's longer i guess..
wide corners, mmmm turns me on hahah.
unlike seattle circuit, grand valley is pretty long. seattle circuit is too little "weird" for me
some 90 degree corners just pop up everywhere!
 
JW31
seattle circuit is too little "weird" for me
some 90 degree corners just pop up everywhere!
Click to expand...

that's what i thought at first... the fun part of this track is clearing two 90º turns with one solid drift while facing the wall.
 

Latest Posts

Back