Yeah, this topic on the Ford GT in my opinion has rather been beaten to death since if I recall with one thread on big complaints, people kept talking and ranting and raving about how somehow PD screwed up the Ford GT big time and what have you.
Heck there was even a tuning and settings board on such as Scaff had pointed out. When I first saw it, I could not say much to the contrarty becuase I had not had much experience with GT4. A while back though, I showed the tuning and settings thread in relation to the Ford GT that scaff linked to Gabkicks, he took the car out for a run, I did. I was a second slower than he was but we both felt the same...
What are (some) people complaining about this car?
The only reason I could figure is that becuase it was a cover car, some people must have somehow expected it to be an end-all-beat-all, absoulte best braking, absolute best handling, absoute perfect performace car thru and thru...
and they expect to get from say 180mph to 60 mph in 150 meters or less for a corner (less it's a hairpin, then say 40-30mph), because 'it's a supercar, it should brake as fast as it accelerates'... could be wrong about that.
It goes proper, it turns better than most other road cars I've tired on GT on N spec tires (N2 or N3), it brakes perfeclty fine. But the problem is that this car exposes the lack of sense of speed in GT4. You feel like you're going maybe 30 when you're really heading at 80, this also has been mentioned more than once.
The only reason you would have to be more carefull in this braking comparied to an NSX-R is becuase you're going into a lot of corners a lot faster in thie Ford GT than the NSX-R, or a Z06 or a GTR-34 (one of the 7...or so...). Then again I havent driven it to death like I have the NSX-R or Z06, but it's an easy car, plus it's been discussed again and again at the places Scaff has put links out for. His threads say it better than I could anyway.
I guess that's all I'll say now.
Till later.