Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Tornado, post: 13264746, member: 75653"] I was always amused that cars like this of this era so commonly have the most skeevy, owned-by-a-serial-killer vibed example they can find for the image header that Wikipedia uses: [IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Dodge_Charger_%281538984607%29.jpg[/IMG] Mismatched tires, paint that has faded in different levels on every body panel, beginning signs of rust on the quarters that will no doubt be ignored, uneven body panels, dangling electrical cords, etc. Stuff that you look at it and you just knows it burns oil and clunks through each gear on the automatic and perpetually smells like a gas leak. And it's not like they couldn't find more pictures of ones that were taken care of , because you look at the article and there's always several pictures of ones that are immaculate (for whatever reason they may be kept that way) instead of ones that only survived because they are in states that don't have annual inspections [I]or[/I] salty winters. Like take a look for yourself: Same thing on the page for the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Celebrity']Celebrity[/URL]. Same thing on the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Cavalier#First_generation_(1982%E2%80%931987)']Cavalier[/URL]. Plus it's not a random occurrence, because I remember this picture: [I]used[/I] to be the header image on Wikipedia. [/QUOTE]