GTP Cool Wall: 2013 Jaguar C-X75 Prototype

  • Thread starter Thread starter White & Nerdy
  • 94 comments
  • 6,745 views

2013 Jaguar C-X75 Prototype


  • Total voters
    100
  • Poll closed .
Messages
4,209
United States
Wasilla, AK
2013 Jaguar C-X75 nominated by DeathSmiles

kdi7.jpg


Stats:
Production: 2013
Style: 2-door coupe
Engine: 1.6L supercharged inline 4 backed up by 2 195 HP electric motors (rated 890 HP & 738 lb-ft)
Transmission: 7-speed automated manual
Layout: Mid-engine, All-wheel-drive
My take? Let's just say I'm glad this car never made it to production.
 
Looks quite good, even though not a production car. Really funky drivetrain for a supercar (the 1.6 I4 part). I think it deserves cool.
 
I like it, but it's still seriously uncool because concept car.
 
Sub Zero. Mid-engined AWD hypercar, just like XJ220 was originally. Shame that they will not build this car, it's far more cool than other hybrid hypercars.
 
Normally I'd be of the "prototype = not cool" people but the fact that this actually worked, it's a Jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag, hybrid, and it looks amazing, it's definitely a Sub-Zero.
 
Far less cool, you mean. Not content to simply corrupt the purity of the hypercar concept with environmentally-oriented features, this car goes full fail with an engine small enough to be mistaken for the one they put in the older Honda Civics.
 
I was looking forward to see this car making it into production, eventually duking it out with LaFerrari, P1, and 918 Spyder, so I was kinda disappointed when they cancelled it.

But I highly respect the fact that they managed to finish a working prototype, and decided to hand it to several auto journalists for them to tell stories on how the car feels, even though it was ultimately unfinished business and susceptible to negative criticisms or exposable flaws. I'm not saying that it's completely bad for the company's reputation, as they can learn from the feedback, and many of us will still bask in awe about what they've achieved anyway. Still, it was nowhere near what was hyped about the production version. However, in many cases of projects being cancelled in the midst of development, we often hear about the company throwing everything out of the window at once. It's not the same story with this one. There's tangible evidence of what they've done. We'll see about their claim that they will use what they learn from the project on future models. We don't really know about the validity behind that statement right now.

I'll say it deserves a "cool", at least. It's not a complete disappointment. Oh, and at the moment, it hasn't fallen into the hands of a smug, overly wealthy person who only wants to utilize it as an overt display of his wealth, with no actual interest in the car. Using that argument to say it's uncool would be invalid...wouldn't it?
 
If it made it into production:

What kind of a douche buys a mid engined supercar from Jaguar?

Since it didn't make it into production:

What kind of douche buys a concept car?

Seriously Uncool.
 
It looks nice. The straight 4 engine does not do it for me. If they made it a V4 engine I might have been interested a little more. I am curious if it will make it into Gran Turismo 6.
 
What kind of a douche buys a mid engined supercar from Jaguar?

Someone who simply wants to use it as a display of wealth doesn't buy a mid-engined supercar from Jaguar. I don't think that kind of person is aware about the existence of such thing. Not even the XJ220. That person thinks Jaguar simply makes luxury sedans like the XJ and grand tourers like the XK. He will just find out about the latest Ferrari or Lamborghini, and buy it, if you know what I mean. It takes someone more than that to know and own a mid-engined supercar from Jaguar. Like, you know, someone who actually loves cars.


Now, not specifically pointed out to anyone here, but...

What's with the widespread, irrational hatred of everyone who is rich, anyway. Their money doesn't just fall out from the sky for them to collect. It takes great amount of effort to become wealthy. It's not a zero-sum game, either. When someone becomes richer, it doesn't directly mean that poorer people are being disadvantaged.

I don't think about the owner when a supercar passes by, just the greatness of the car itself, and I take great pleasure and indulgment in knowing the existence of such things. Even it's inherently irrational and childlike to make one, it still never fails to lighten me up, witnessing that they are entities out there who idealize cars not merely as means of transportation, but also as a work of art, and a form of joy or excitement to great heights. It satisfies my inner child. I'll admit that the concept or possibility of making the driver the center of attention wasn't in my awareness when I started becoming so dreamy about supercars as a little boy, but I can always manage to wipe that out from my mind. If you always have the owner in your mind, why does it always say like, "Look at me! I'm rich! I'm rich!" to you? Yes, it can inevitably be a display of wealth, even if it's not the owner's actual intention, but can't you see it in a more self-uplifting way? Can't you interpret a supercar being driven on the road as a message saying that, "you also can, if you want it"? Can't you see it as a person's hope or dream being realized? Most of you aren't living in an authoritarian state, right? Or extremely poor to the point you have no means to access the Internet? How are you on GTPlanet, anyway?


No. There are a lot of better reasons to say that.

If you're talking about the electric motor...well, first of all, putting people's ideals on what makes a proper supercar aside...

Yes, they're relevant to the popular concept of making things more environmentally friendly, and to some extent, they may seem like...err...ruining the manufacturer's supposed...umm..."artistic integrity". But firstly they're chosen to satisfy certain opposing, external parties that uphold the idea of efficient energy usage, I'd say. And ultimately, the electric motors aren't there purely for the sake of the environment. They're intensely utilized as a performance-oriented incentive by the manufacturer. Not exactly the same case with cars like the Toyota Prius or Honda Insight.

I'm not a huge fan of electric motors either, despite the instantaneous torque delivery. Not really loving the silent whine that sounds like it's a machine from a sci-fi film as well, even thought it's different and unique. I like imagining cars as mechanical interpretation of a living creature, with an adamantly displayed personality through the way it looks, the way it sounds, the way it behaves under certain driving conditions, etc. I like the feeling you get when starting the engine, the roar, the sense of hearing something suddenly coming to life with an enthusiastic energy. And 100% electric power can destroy some of those ideals of mine. But this car is not 100% electric-powered.

And the small engine...well, it takes so much more effort to extract a lot of power from a smaller engine with lesser number of cylinders, so I'll respect the manufacturer for that.


It's just another insignificant piece of my mind. I just felt like wanting to post this. Nothing extremely serious to anyone.

Of course, going back on topic, it's all up to the voter on whether the car is cool or not.
 
Sub Zero since it very nearly went into production. This could have redeemed Jag from the colossal failure that was the XJ220 (broken promises abound there). The engineering behind it is incredible and it could have been a genuine rival to the new establishmant of hybrid hypercars.
 
Last edited:
This car is a rare thing, it's a car that is so damn pretty that I can't look at it or too long or things will happen.

It also has a gorgeous interior and and they painted it the best color in the world. :drool: And of course the technical stuff as well, but the looks are still better. :drool:

And for those that said they didn't make, 5 of them exist. 3 would be sold at auctions, one for a future Jaguar museum, and another for running demonstrations

Sub-Zero.
 
JagLarge1.jpg



M'eh, I don't think it looks that special. I'd stop to take a photo of an XJ220, not so much this. Slightly bonkers powertrain though, I always approve of that.
 
Well, it's a bit dopey-looking in some angles, like the following emoticon :dopey:

But it's gorgeous most of the time.

I voted "cool" by the way.
 
It's a Hypercar with generic styling... it's a concept car... they aren't going to build it.

Seriously uncool.
 
Trust me when I say it looks stunning in the flesh. In blue at least.

Still don't think the front is much to look at, and the fact they never put it into production doesn't help. But it just about reaches cool.

No. There are a lot of better reasons to say that.

What? That a twin-charged I4 can make 360bhp more than any V6 you're accustomed to is the unholiest of the unholy?

Boiling it down to "It's got an engine that can fit into a Japanobox and it powers electric motors, thus my idea of hypercar purity has been tainted!" in a car that'll never be sold... why the hell should anyone care what it's got? The whole idea of a concept is to showcase different ideas, and that includes engines. As an engineering exercise, the C-X75 was impressive. Especially the drivetrain. The initial concept that came before they made plans to put it into production was pretty far-out as well, but wouldn't have made an ideal production vehicle.

Perhaps if you took of those displacement goggles you're always wearing, you'd see that.
 
Last edited:
Cool, just.

All hypercars are Uncool. All Jags are Sub-Zero (ignore the X-Type...). The stillborn nature of it adds a touch of mystique to it... those latter points drag it out of the depths for me.

Does it have an all-electric mode? I maintain that rolling around in a car like this in complete silence is pretty damn cool. It isn't obnoxious and is a touch stealthy.
 
Last edited:
One of the most beautiful concept cars in recent years and the amount of engineering that Jaguar put into this car.

Sub-zero.
 
Maybe if they had actually built the thing it would be some measure above irrelevance, and the possibility existed for it to be cool. As it is, something meaningless is seriously uncool by default.

Now, not specifically pointed out to anyone here, but...

What's with the widespread, irrational hatred of everyone who is rich, anyway. Their money doesn't just fall out from the sky for them to collect. It takes great amount of effort to become wealthy. It's not a zero-sum game, either. When someone becomes richer, it doesn't directly mean that poorer people are being disadvantaged.

I don't think about the owner when a supercar passes by, just the greatness of the car itself, and I take great pleasure and indulgment in knowing the existence of such things. Even it's inherently irrational and childlike to make one, it still never fails to lighten me up, witnessing that they are entities out there who idealize cars not merely as means of transportation, but also as a work of art, and a form of joy or excitement to great heights. It satisfies my inner child. I'll admit that the concept or possibility of making the driver the center of attention wasn't in my awareness when I started becoming so dreamy about supercars as a little boy, but I can always manage to wipe that out from my mind. If you always have the owner in your mind, why does it always say like, "Look at me! I'm rich! I'm rich!" to you? Yes, it can inevitably be a display of wealth, even if it's not the owner's actual intention, but can't you see it in a more self-uplifting way? Can't you interpret a supercar being driven on the road as a message saying that, "you also can, if you want it"? Can't you see it as a person's hope or dream being realized? Most of you aren't living in an authoritarian state, right? Or extremely poor to the point you have no means to access the Internet? How are you on GTPlanet, anyway
lol giving Zenith a lesson on capitalism.
 
lol giving Zenith a lesson on capitalism.

Hey, as I implied, I wasn't specifically pointing that out to one particular person. I have just been seeing similar comments in previous "Cool Wall" threads, and that brought out my desire to say something like that.
 
Hypercars and concept cars would normally be Seriously Uncool, but this manages a 'cool' for it's engineering alone. Would have been subzero had it retained the earlier concept's twin-turbine generators.

Those who complain about it's 1.6 4cyl are missing the point. It's not used to drive the wheels directly, it's purely used to generate energy to power the electric motors at each corner. IMO more advance than anything Porsche, McLaren or Ferrari are pedaling right now.
 
Hey, as I implied, I wasn't specifically pointing that out to one particular person. I have just been seeing similar comments in previous "Cool Wall" threads, and that brought out my desire to say something like that.
It's not that the people mentioning it hate rich people - it's that much of society does.

It's quite tricky for something to be cool if 7 of every 10 people want to key it or slash its tyres out of avarice-guided petulance.
 
Back