GilesGuthrie
Staff Emeritus
- 11,038

- Edinburgh, UK
- CMDRTheDarkLord
OK, here is a definition of a hairdresser's car, plus some examples...
A hairdresser's car is all about show. It's about looks, and being pretty. It's about being comfortable inside, and which colours it can be bought in. New fashion colours are ace, but in their absence go for plain red. Or something pastel. Something to set off the highlights. It's about whether it's the new thing on the block, or if it's socially-acceptable because a lot of peers have it. It's about getting a huge amount of visual flash for as little cash as possible.
A hairdresser's car is not about resale value. Nor is it about acceleration, top speed, fuel economy, braking (although ABS, "whatever that is" is good). It's not about whether you can get luggage/dogs/children in the back, or about whether it's reliable, economical and well engineered. Wheel size, style and material is not relevant. Unless the wheels are 'fun', with 'curvy' bits (note that the rim does not constitute a 'curvy bit) that is.
In short then, a hairdresser's car is about style. And more specifically, about style and lack of substance. Substance is actively not desired. This is why a Z3 1.9 is a hairdresser's car, and a Porsche Boxster is not.
Examples of hairdresser's cars:
Rover MGF (not the TF)
Mazda MX5 (although that car's reputation as being a fine handler is causing its popularity within the scissored-fraternity to wane)
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki X90
Suzuki Jimny
VW Golf convertible
VW Beetle
Citroen Saxo (1.1 in Yellow only)
Land Rover Freelander (3dr petrol)
BMW Z3 (not M Roadster)
Mercedes SLK230
Renault Megane Convertible
VW Polo (in pastels only)
Peugeot 206CC
Does that answer the question?
A hairdresser's car is all about show. It's about looks, and being pretty. It's about being comfortable inside, and which colours it can be bought in. New fashion colours are ace, but in their absence go for plain red. Or something pastel. Something to set off the highlights. It's about whether it's the new thing on the block, or if it's socially-acceptable because a lot of peers have it. It's about getting a huge amount of visual flash for as little cash as possible.
A hairdresser's car is not about resale value. Nor is it about acceleration, top speed, fuel economy, braking (although ABS, "whatever that is" is good). It's not about whether you can get luggage/dogs/children in the back, or about whether it's reliable, economical and well engineered. Wheel size, style and material is not relevant. Unless the wheels are 'fun', with 'curvy' bits (note that the rim does not constitute a 'curvy bit) that is.
In short then, a hairdresser's car is about style. And more specifically, about style and lack of substance. Substance is actively not desired. This is why a Z3 1.9 is a hairdresser's car, and a Porsche Boxster is not.
Examples of hairdresser's cars:
Rover MGF (not the TF)
Mazda MX5 (although that car's reputation as being a fine handler is causing its popularity within the scissored-fraternity to wane)
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki X90
Suzuki Jimny
VW Golf convertible
VW Beetle
Citroen Saxo (1.1 in Yellow only)
Land Rover Freelander (3dr petrol)
BMW Z3 (not M Roadster)
Mercedes SLK230
Renault Megane Convertible
VW Polo (in pastels only)
Peugeot 206CC
Does that answer the question?