But he didn't win the thing that actually matters.
That's what I was thinking too.I dunno, looking at the lap, it looked pretty slow through the corners, maybe the BBC made up the time to play to the British audience..
I dunno, looking at the lap, it looked pretty slow through the corners, maybe the BBC made up the time to play to the British audience..
He was in the older car, though, since they started the F1 laps in the Suzuki Liana or whatever it's called but now they use a slightly faster car...I dunno, looking at the lap, it looked pretty slow through the corners, maybe the BBC made up the time to play to the British audience..
He was in the older car, though, since they started the F1 laps in the Suzuki Liana or whatever it's called but now they use a slightly faster car...
In any case, there is no way in hell that the BBC would do that given the recent scandals relating to 'maintaining the public trust'. They've been put on the rack for rigging a cat-naming competition on Blue Peter for goodness sake (the public originally voted for it to be called Muhammed.... I think...) and every member of BBC staff has received multiple reminders (via email) about maintaining the highest levels of transparency and honesty in every aspect of their work... so no, it's probably not fake...
Pouring more fuel in the fire... is it just me or are those awards from British nominators?Conspiracy theories are just so exciting.
I dunno, looking at the lap, it looked pretty slow through the corners, maybe the BBC made up the time to play to the British audience..
I thought he looked neat and tidy (quite unlike how he looks on the circuit) but well on top of things. Thought he looked quick but I was also surprised how well he did.
I'm not convinced that a dry lap in the Suzuki is worth 3 seconds over a wet/damp/possibly oily lap. The Top Gear test track consists of either easy flat-out or slow corners. Time in the dry is only going to be made up over a wet lap under braking or through medium-fast corners. The circuit has no medium-fast corners. Since the Suzuki has very modest tyres and ABS braking and the track has only two areas where you will be braking heavily - i doubt much time will be gained in the dry. Any slight advantages the car has in these areas in the dry are likely to be almost canceled out by the advantages of better being able to slide the car on a slightly wet surface through the slower corners.
Pouring more fuel in the fire... is it just me or are those awards from British nominators?![]()
Your thread was created to discuss something was already being discussed in the proper thread in the correct place.Edit: Maybe my Hamilton/Top Gear thread shouldn't have been locked since people are discussing the matter here. Double standard anyone?
There are two sorts of "neat and tidy" driving. One actually isn't. A driver on the very limit will never look "smooth" from the driver's perspective. Small changes to the steering, throttle and brakes will be constantly needed in order to meet the demands of slight changes in tyre-grip, surface, weight-transfer and whatnot. The key would be doing those changes quickly and precisely enough to keep it on that edge - which would, in turn, still look neat and tidy from the outside, since he'll perfectly keep his line.
In a Telegraph interview Hamilton said these award ceremonies combined with all the work he has to do now as the only driver for Mclaren have led to him being quite busy and worn out.
So people, vote for someone else!
I'd say it's worth about 3 seconds to the average driver, to a formula 1 driver, that difference between wet and dry should be smaller. As for sliding the car out in the slow corners, that will slow you down even more. There is no advantage to a lap in the wet over a lap in the dry performance wise. Areas of the track like the follow through will be vastly different to drive in the wet than the dry, your car could very well just aquaplane off the track if you go full throttle through it, but in the dry you can. The hammerhead is a heavy braking corner that requires a lot of traction from the tyres going round it as well. I'd say that corner alone could be worth close to 1 second in wet conditions over dry.I'm not convinced that a dry lap in the Suzuki is worth 3 seconds over a wet/damp/possibly oily lap. The Top Gear test track consists of either easy flat-out or slow corners. Time in the dry is only going to be made up over a wet lap under braking or through medium-fast corners. The circuit has no medium-fast corners. Since the Suzuki has very modest tyres and ABS braking and the track has only two areas where you will be braking heavily - i doubt much time will be gained in the dry. Any slight advantages the car has in these areas in the dry are likely to be almost cancelled out by the advantages of better being able to slide the car on a slightly wet surface through the slower corners.
And if you look at the footage he is always making corrections, like any good driver. I have no doubts about the time. It wasnt that wet.
There are two sorts of "neat and tidy" driving. One actually isn't. A driver on the very limit will never look "smooth" from the driver's perspective. Small changes to the steering, throttle and brakes will be constantly needed in order to meet the demands of slight changes in tyre-grip, surface, weight-transfer and whatnot. The key would be doing those changes quickly and precisely enough to keep it on that edge - which would, in turn, still look neat and tidy from the outside, since he'll perfectly keep his line.
As for sliding the car out in the slow corners, that will slow you down even more.
Areas of the track like the follow through will be vastly different to drive in the wet than the dry, your car could very well just aquaplane off the track if you go full throttle through it, but in the dry you can.
The hammerhead is a heavy braking corner that requires a lot of traction from the tyres going round it as well. I'd say that corner alone could be worth close to 1 second in wet conditions over dry.
So the field here is split between those who believe the time is right, but it wasn't wet enough to really affect the time, and those who believe it's a fake.
And on we move...
I wonder if alot of the phone votes came from Oxford![]()
Well, Lewis comes second again. He was odds-on favourite to win BBC Sports Personality of the Year 2007, but lost out in a public vote to boxer Joe Calzaghe. Calzaghe was arguably the only serious contender to challenge Hamilton, and nobody can say that he's not a deserved winner - but Lewis must be wondering what the hell he has to do to win... I was genuinely surprised that Lewis came second. I wonder if alot of the phone votes came from Oxford![]()