Hometown Tourism

  • Thread starter Thread starter GilesGuthrie
  • 15 comments
  • 586 views

GilesGuthrie

Staff Emeritus
Messages
11,038
United Kingdom
Edinburgh, UK
Messages
CMDRTheDarkLord
In March, I visited Australia. I did a lot of the usual tourist stuff, which generally involved wandering about, looking at stuff that was there to be looked at. Quite a lot of sitting in street cafés, drinking beer and watching the world go by. It seemed like the most natural thing in the world to be doing.

This month sees the Edinburgh International, Book and Fringe Festivals. The city is hopping. It's choc-full of tourists, and a lot of the bars simply aren't closing. And the ones that do have licenses until 3am. In past years, the sheer busy-ness of the city has been a real pain. It's difficult to get to and from work, or get any shopping done, or go sit in your favourite pub, because suddenly 50,000 Italians have moved in. Trust me, Edinburgh residents generally hate the festival.

I had an arrangement to meet a friend, and was like an hour early. With little to do I thought "Well, it's a nive day, I'll get a beer and sit outside, and watch the world go by". It was fantastic. It was really similar to being in Melbourne again, although obviously the scenery was different and it was 5 degrees cooler.

I saw Edinburgh the way tourists see it. I watched the people sitting on the buses, heads down, reading books, or the paper, just waiting and wishing to be home, or wherever they were going. It seemed a huge waste of time, and something that's an endless source of frustration, and it's not something from which I'm immune, as I'm usually pretty grumpy on the bus home from work. It bugs me that it takes an hour to go 6 miles.

It almost transformed my view of Edinburgh and the Festival. I've been to three shows this year already, and loved them all. It's totally party time here, and the residents should get into it a bit more.

The saddening thing though is that we as a species seem so hellbent on "seeing the world", that we often miss what's under our noses. The fact is that there is beauty everywhere, so why do I feel the need to travel 10,000 miles to see this:
harbouroperahouse.jpg


When I can travel 6 miles and see this:
castleatnight2.jpg


They're both different, and both majestic, so why do I take one for granted? Why is it pretty much "not there" for me?

Is this a worldwide phenomenon, or is it just the Brits who feel they have to travel to see stuff, even when there's plenty of cool stuff under their nose?
 
Nah - it's like that everywhere. I've done one 'touristy' thing since I moved to Sydney (Harbour Bridge climb), yet in the two years before we moved up, we went to quite a lot of other 'tourist' type attractions.

Other than exceptional laziness, I can't explain it. Pretty solid explanation though.
 
Actually, I had an argument with my parents the other day on this very same topic. I've never seen the point of vacations. You simply spend thousands of dollars to go eat fast food someplace else for a week. When you put it that way, vacations are worthless. Unless there is something truly fantastic at a vacationing spot, you can find something similar, or possibly even better, a lot closer than your planned destination. Of course, I think Yosemite should be paved over, so my opinion doesn't count for much on such matters.
 
Originally posted by Timmotheus
Of course, I think Yosemite should be paved over, so my opinion doesn't count for much on such matters.
Why?
 
Well, vacations are 'getaways' for adults as far as I know, because they want to be away from their work and environment, but yeah, I agree, vacations are a WASTE OF MONEY. I can look back to my trip to Yellowstone. Why did I have to travel so far, just to look at trees when I can go to a big park closeby and stare all I want?

Vancouver is one of the most 'beautiful' cities in north america, but my parents never seem to get that. Beauty literally SURROUNDS vancouver, yet, they insist on going to other places to see the exact same things I can see in Stanley Park.
 
Originally posted by halfracedrift
Well, vacations are 'getaways' for adults as far as I know, because they want to be away from their work and environment, but yeah, I agree, vacations are a WASTE OF MONEY. I can look back to my trip to Yellowstone. Why did I have to travel so far, just to look at trees when I can go to a big park closeby and stare all I want?

Vancouver is one of the most 'beautiful' cities in north america, but my parents never seem to get that. Beauty literally SURROUNDS vancouver, yet, they insist on going to other places to see the exact same things I can see in Stanley Park.
Agreed vancouver is a very beautiful place, and thats why tourist head there, i really enjoyed it there, but also if i lived there i would also want to get a away from the every day thing but not necessarilly going 10,000 km's away for it.
 
I don't like vacations too much anymore, because we have to drive everywhere, and I want to go places where my parents wont take me. I also have a little sister that follows me everywhere. I'd rather go out for a day with my girlfriend to an amusement park.
 
Originally posted by Attila_Da_Hun
Why?
Because I don't like trees. It would also be more practical. Businesses could move to Yosemite, and not have to worry about creating pollution. How fantastic.
 
I live about 45min - 60min away from niagra falls
 
Originally posted by Squid
I live about 45min - 60min away from niagra falls
Maybe but, your getting ripped off because the Canadian side is better :lol::)
 
I'm not sure about the age of you people but I think traveling is an old person kind of thing. I am 33 and traveling dosen't excite me one bit. I did a lot of traveling when I was younger and in a band and I thought it wasn't anything special.

I think old people play a sort of game like "I've been to (name any place special)." I think they do it to try to show each other up.

Old people, :rolleyes:.
 
I can't wait to travel. I'm really looking foward to visiting Scotland quite a bit. It's where my family originally came from, and we have a lot of history there. I've done quite a bit of research on the family name, and I'm in love with it.

So naturally, I want to go to the place where it all happened. Besides, I live in Richmond, Virginia. The most scenic thing we have around here in a Target. Trees have been replaced by traffic lights, parks replaced by malls, fields replaced by movie theaters.

Sadly, more and more people truely need to travel in order to see the true beauty of the world.
 
I love travelling. And I'm not old, unless 32 is old. And I can give you one reason why: The sea. And more generally, natural geography. Different areas have diffrerent geography. The Discovery channel can only show you so much. You have to be there. I never saw a mountain until I was 22. Around tha time I started the "road trip" phase. I drove back and forth from Chicago to Phoenix and San Francisco a few times and enjoyed seeing the country. My only expense was gas and food. Eventually I moved to Phoenix. Then I moved to San Francisco. Than back to Chicago. I settled in Phoenix eventually and have been here for four years, got married, bought a house, and had a kid. I sometimes wish I could still hop in the car and take off for a couple weeks, but I'd miss my family too much, and I have responsibilities now. Any trip we'd take together wouldn't involve days in the car.

The fact that I travel doesn't take away from my deep appreciation of where I live. People come to Arizona from all over the world to see Sedona, the Sonoran Desert, and the Grand Canyon. And I go to those places for day trips. I'm glad I live in the only place in the world where Saguaro cactus grow. But the desert is only one kind of place. I also like old cities, coastal places, snow, and as I said, the sea. I have to travel to be there.

A couple years ago I went to Hawaii. There are things there you can't do anywhere else, swim in a waterfall, snorkel in a hundred feet of water and see a million fish and whales and sharks and be in the ocean... walk on a volcanoe and see lava pouring into the sea and walk through a lava tube. My last trip was to the Pacific Northwest. There are no temperate rainforests in Arizona or anywhere else in the US and I wanted to see it. So I did. I also went whale watching and saw the coast, forests and wildlife of Vancouver Island. Next summer I'm going to Vancouver city (and probably Victoria again) and I'm really looking forward to it.

There's also the history of places. I'm a little envious of Giles to live in such a historically rich place. You can read books, watch documentaries and all of that, but there's no replacement for being there and soaking it in. Location matters.

After I'd been away from Chicago for a long time I went back and visited the Indiana Dunes State Park. I realized then that this was a beautiful and unique place and regretted not appreciating it more when I lived nearby. The whole Great Lakes area is chock full of natural beauty and history. I lived right there and I missed it all. I guess that's how I learned my lesson about appreciating and even loving where you are for what it is.

There is a type of travel I despise, though. It is the Disney World trip. A "vacation" to another corporate hell-hole where you throw your money in for the piviledge of having obnoxious "attractions", crappy food, and under-employed goons in cartoon character suits bother you. You stay in crowded hotels and sit in traffic just like at home. It's vacations like that that you need a vacation from when it's over. I dread the day when my kid says "Dad I want to go to Disney Land". What, will I say "forget it kid, I hate it there"? I'll have to take him, and I'll probably enjoy seeing him have fun, and when it's over, I'll need a vacation. I'll bring him and show him what travel is really about.
 
Originally posted by hanker
Maybe but, your getting ripped off because the Canadian side is better :lol::)

yea your right but now our side is starting to get new places but the canadian side is better ....for now:trouble:
 
Originally posted by milefile
I love travelling. And I'm not old, unless 32 is old. And I can give you one reason why: The sea. And more generally, natural geography. Different areas have diffrerent geography. The Discovery channel can only show you so much. You have to be there. I never saw a mountain until I was 22. Around tha time I started the "road trip" phase. I drove back and forth from Chicago to Phoenix and San Francisco a few times and enjoyed seeing the country. My only expense was gas and food. Eventually I moved to Phoenix. Then I moved to San Francisco. Than back to Chicago. I settled in Phoenix eventually and have been here for four years, got married, bought a house, and had a kid. I sometimes wish I could still hop in the car and take off for a couple weeks, but I'd miss my family too much, and I have responsibilities now. Any trip we'd take together wouldn't involve days in the car.

The fact that I travel doesn't take away from my deep appreciation of where I live. People come to Arizona from all over the world to see Sedona, the Sonoran Desert, and the Grand Canyon. And I go to those places for day trips. I'm glad I live in the only place in the world where Saguaro cactus grow. But the desert is only one kind of place. I also like old cities, coastal places, snow, and as I said, the sea. I have to travel to be there.

A couple years ago I went to Hawaii. There are things there you can't do anywhere else, swim in a waterfall, snorkel in a hundred feet of water and see a million fish and whales and sharks and be in the ocean... walk on a volcanoe and see lava pouring into the sea and walk through a lava tube. My last trip was to the Pacific Northwest. There are no temperate rainforests in Arizona or anywhere else in the US and I wanted to see it. So I did. I also went whale watching and saw the coast, forests and wildlife of Vancouver Island. Next summer I'm going to Vancouver city (and probably Victoria again) and I'm really looking forward to it.

There's also the history of places. I'm a little envious of Giles to live in such a historically rich place. You can read books, watch documentaries and all of that, but there's no replacement for being there and soaking it in. Location matters.

After I'd been away from Chicago for a long time I went back and visited the Indiana Dunes State Park. I realized then that this was a beautiful and unique place and regretted not appreciating it more when I lived nearby. The whole Great Lakes area is chock full of natural beauty and history. I lived right there and I missed it all. I guess that's how I learned my lesson about appreciating and even loving where you are for what it is.

There is a type of travel I despise, though. It is the Disney World trip. A "vacation" to another corporate hell-hole where you throw your money in for the piviledge of having obnoxious "attractions", crappy food, and under-employed goons in cartoon character suits bother you. You stay in crowded hotels and sit in traffic just like at home. It's vacations like that that you need a vacation from when it's over. I dread the day when my kid says "Dad I want to go to Disney Land". What, will I say "forget it kid, I hate it there"? I'll have to take him, and I'll probably enjoy seeing him have fun, and when it's over, I'll need a vacation. I'll bring him and show him what travel is really about.


yeah,... what he said.


I'll have to assume that those of you who think otherwise are either A) not working adults... or B) not concerned with magnificent man-made structures or geological masterpieces.
 
Originally posted by milefile
I sometimes wish I could still hop in the car and take off for a couple weeks, but I'd miss my family too much, and I have responsibilities now.

This is why I didn't get married.
 
Back