I really think we will be surprised with gt4

cobragt · Sep 10, 2003

Ok ppl are saying the pitcrew movie is FMV but check these out

Look at this

ok we see them being made
now compare that to this

Now look at this

Now I know PD wouldn't spent this much time making that for just a intro movie, that would be kind of stupid if you ask me
Now look at this car model, sexy isn't it, I see jaggies, just afew

Now look at this model, same detail

Hadly any jaggies seen so my guess is that so call FMV is the gt4 engine, remember ppl, gt4 right now is using the gtc/gt3 engine and like the maker said we are adding all kind of features to engine. Remember back at E3 when gt4 was playable, did it use physics engine of gt4, no so you never know. We'll find out when it comes out.
BTW isthis a gt4 track or is it real :confused:

toyomatt84 · Sep 10, 2003

We will be. I keep comparing the first 2 versions of GT and thinking the change will be very similar.

toyomatt84 · Sep 10, 2003

It's almost a comparison of David vs. Goliath wouldn't you think?

gt3freak_2001 · Sep 10, 2003

The only thing that makes me think it is an FMV is; can the PS2 handle the animations of 500+ cars having their bonnets lifted and tyres being changed becuase not all cars have the same engine position or bonnet shape. But if PD can pull it off then that's great news to us gamers, as I hated the way your car levitated in the pits in GT3

Majarvis · Sep 10, 2003

Are you done yet? Honestly, this section is getting awfully cluttered as of late, and you're a big part of it. This has gotta be the 5th thread you've started about this same topic, the pit crews :rolleyes:

Please, give it a rest! We've seen them, we like them, but stop shoving them down our throats! :irked:

Laser Lens · Sep 10, 2003

Originally posted by Majarvis
Are you done yet? Honestly, this section is getting awfully cluttered as of late, and you're a big part of it. This has gotta be the 5th thread you've started about this same topic, the pit crews Please, give it a rest! We've seen them, we like them, but stop shoving them down our throats!

This section is not 'getting cluttered'. Even if it was 'getting cluttered' all that would mean is more people are posting here which would be a good thing. I could find only one other thread on the first two pages of this forum which had pit crews as its main subject. He's not shoving it down our throats.

Solid Lifters · Sep 10, 2003

Originally posted by Laser Lens
This section is not 'getting cluttered'. Even if it was 'getting cluttered' all that would mean is more people are posting here which would be a good thing. I could find only one other thread on the first two pages of this forum which had pit crews as its main subject. He's not shoving it down our throats.

No, this thread was pointless. He could have made is point here.

GTP Forums - pit crews in gt4 ????????
Address:https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/t-29604.html

Instead, he decided to make this thread, and with a title that doesn't fit, which is why {b]Marjavis[/b] felt he was having this topic shoved down his throat.

Enough with the useless threads people.

Laser Lens · Sep 10, 2003

There is no such thing as a pointless thread. Who cares if the title didn't fit. The thread you referenced is too long(36 posts) to be adding new info.

vat_man · Sep 10, 2003

Well, this is starting to get pointless. Are you planning to discuss the topic, or are you going to continue to snipe at one another? If so, I can tell you where this thread's going...

Solid Lifters · Sep 10, 2003

Originally posted by Laser Lens
There is no such thing as a pointless thread. Who cares if the title didn't fit. The thread you referenced is too long(36 posts) to be adding new info.

1. Yes, there is! Some threads have all the worthiness of a brain hemorhage.

2. Most people here care, I do. They slow things down, and take up valuable space. Not to mention frustrate people when they spend the time to click and wait for them. They also shove worthwhile threads to page two, where they most likely wont be seen.

3. Some threads are several hundred pages long, so no valid point there.

Sorry, you lost this one.

Solid Lifters · Sep 10, 2003

Originally posted by vat_man
Well, this is starting to get pointless. Are you planning to discuss the topic, or are you going to continue to snipe at one another? If so, I can tell you where this thread's going...

Yep, it sounds like you need to flush this turd.

Laser Lens · Sep 10, 2003

Well I was willing to let this rest when vat man stepped in......

Originally posted by Solid Lifters

Sorry, you lost this one.

Classic. Posting on internet message boards is not about 'winning' or 'losing'. Internet message boards like this one are for the legitimate discussion of ideas. Calling someones thread 'pointless' or 'useless' is not legitimate debate. There is no discussion ocurring when you call someones thread 'pointless'.

In case you didn't notice,two other people posted messages before you started complaining. So they didn't think the thread was 'pointless'. If you find so many threads in this forum to be 'pointless' then why do you bother posting here.

I will not be responding to any other comments made in this thread.

vat_man · Sep 10, 2003

...and we're done. Thanks for your help.