- Know Your Car -

  • Thread starter Thread starter under18carbon
  • 8 comments
  • 1,038 views
Messages
3,692
Well, I had nothing to do (like usual) today so I decided to type out some interesting articles about car parts and stuff which appeared on the newspapers a couple of days back. I’ll update this if anything new pops up :D

Thank you to my local newspaper for this :D : The New Straits Times

Know Your Car

Turbo versus Supercharger

All engines draw air into the cylinders. It is mixed with petrol or diesel to enable the explosions that give the car its power. Most ordinary cars suck in air at normal atmospheric pressure: as the piston moves down in the cylinder, air is pulled in through the valves.
However, some engines use systems which force air into the cylinder under pressure. More air means that more fuel can be added (the ratio of fuel to air remaining the same). This increases the power of the explosions, thus the car’s performance. This process is known as ‘forced induction’, and there are two very different systems available.
The first and most common is the turbocharger. This is a turbine which is spun by the flow of exhaust coming out of an engine. Its power is used to drive a fan, which blows air into the engine.
By contrast, a supercharger is a mechanical pump run by a belt from the engine itself. Unlike a turbo, which can spin at over 100,000rpm, a supercharger is geared to work at not much more that engine idle speed, but its aim is the same: to dramatically increase the amount of air ingested into the engine to create a bigger bang when it is combined with fuel and ignited.
Each system has its own advantages and drawbacks. Turbos are smaller, lighter and more efficient than superchargers but require a substantial flow of exhaust gas to work properly: at low revs turbo engines feel sluggish and even at high engine speeds take a small but discernible time to respond to the throttle.
Superchargers, by contrast, works from idling revs and have instantaneous throttle response. On the negative side, because they are powered by the engine itself they can significantly increase fuel consumption.

Differentials

All road cars have differentials, and would be undriveable without them.
Driving in a circle, the wheels on the inside have less distance to travel than those on the outside and therefore must turn more slowly.
In a front-wheel drive car the rear wheels will do this naturally but without a differential the front wheels would rotate at the same speed, causing the car to skid. A differential enables each driveshaft to rotate at different speeds appropriate to the corner.
However, normal or open differentials can be caught out. If there are differing levels of grip available to each tyre – when your car has one front tyre on ice and the other on dry tarmac – an open differential will allow the tyre on the ice to spin while the tyre on tarmac doesn’t rotate at all.
This is why many off-road cars have differential locks that can be activated by the driver in difficult conditions and make both wheels on an axle rotate at the same speed regardless of available grip. This would enable the car parked with one tyre on ice the pull away.
Many 4X4s also have a center differential to control the drive sent to the front and rear axles. If the front tyres lose traction more power is sent to the rear, lessening the fronts’ workload and restoring grip.
The last kind of differential often mentioned in road tests is the limited-slip differential. Unlike an open differential that doesn’t limit the speed difference between wheels on the same axle, a limited-slip differential restricts this ‘slip’.
By avoiding power-wasting wheelspin, this can improve traction when accelerating away from corners in low grip conditions and is, therefore, favoured for racing and sports cars.



BTW – Members please point out if there are any mistakes! ;)
 
The first and most common is the turbocharger. This is a turbine which is spun by the flow of exhaust coming out of an engine. Its power is used to drive a fan, which blows air into the engine.

I suppose very basic but it is or should be refered to as compressor wheel and turbine wheel.
Then to go into it more technically is the inducer and exducer of the wheels. These are in reference tot he size of each wheel. Last would be the AR rating of exhaust housing of the turbo. This is very important as it has a direct bearing on the overall power the turbo is capable of making. As a short example if you took a specific T25 turbo which has an AR rating of .64 on the exhaust housing and is rated to 380hp and change the housing with the proper .86 housing your power output capability will also increase to @410hp. That is only by changing the housing and not the wheels.

Next would be wheel design, size, and materails it is made out of.

Then you have bearing type from roller bearing, ball bearing, and bushed bearing. Again this is getting way deeper into the technical size.

Nice very nice well done :)
 
Hey guys, I'm resurrecting this thread to see if anybody (lookin at you, Famine) knows of a formula or general rule of thumb that is useful for calculating a vehicle's idling fuel consumption efficiency if you know its RPM, number of cylinders, compression ratio etc?

Any assistance is greatly appreciated.

Edit: I've since heard of a 2 minutes of idling = ~ 1 mile of travel formula, but this is an extremely loose and variable approximation so its actual usefulness as a metric approaches zero.
 
That's what you think. Also there are more than just two types of differentials but I guess you COULD sum it all up to either open or limited slip.


Also, in regards to fuel consumption at idle

according to some, a typical amount would be .25 to .3 gallons per hour.

Although I may give you the impression, I assure you I am quite capable of Googling that myself.

But, in case you didn't attempt such a thing yourself, allow to me point out that the results are not particularly specific, accurate, or reliable. One even suggests weighing your car before and after.

I'm not sure about yourself, but I do not have an industrial size scale with which to weigh my car, so I was seeking alternative ratiocinative methods to go about this, ie by using such things as the rpm, number of cylinders, cylinder size, stroke, compression ratio, etc to deduce—a little more accurately, than, say ".25 to .3gph"—if possible, what that amount or rate consumed may be.
 
http://www.springerlink.com/content/q402314nm2x21434/

Idle fuel consumption seems to linearly vary with engine displacement. So for a first order estimate, see where your displacement falls on the chart on page 3 (and make sure it's comparable to the engines used in the studies). Though if you want and exact-exact number for your car, you will want something better than that.

The paper lists four or so citations of studies on idle fuel consumption, so maybe try looking for those.
 
Back