Lamborghini Murcielago...certainly beats out the Clio as a Prize car!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tezzell
  • 17 comments
  • 690 views
T

tezzell

Messages
234

Attachments

  • l_ci_lamborghini_d.jpg
    l_ci_lamborghini_d.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 107
i'm not sure you'd make it.
:eek: :eek:
that's the color i like my Esprit's.
 
so has someone made a Lambo that you can shark into GT3?
 
I look at that Lambo and look at it, and no matter what the only thing that comes to mind is:

"So that's what an Audi TT looks like after an elephant sits on it!"

And I'm not bashful in saying that those headlights just ruin the look of the car in my opinion... just another example of putting straight lines in the wrong places.
 
i think the headlights are great looking and like the whole car
 
Same i love that car....just looking at it makes u think its moving at 200mph :lol:
 
Looks too boring... I would've preferred something more adventuresome and less convential from Lamborghini...

Running that thing through the Corkscrew would be pretty scary! :)
 
You know you would love to have it.
 
youth_cycler how can you say that Lambo looks Boring? :confused: Anything but I'd say? :D
 
Bah.

I WANT A FERRARI 360! :bawling:
 
And this is in this forum because??? The only mention of GT3 is in the thread title with "Clio as prize car" and that one post.
 
I think Lamborghini's are more of a car that little kids want, than an actual excellent race car, or an excellent anything for that matter. The look is very exotic, though I think the 1999-2001 Diablo's look better. However, Lamborghini's are actually very hard to drive, don't have very good field of vision, and their engines aren't exactly huge for a V-12. Now don't get me wrong, I'd LOVE to have any Lamborghini, but I'm just saying that it's more of a car that is a dream, whereas something like a Porsche GT2 is a real race car.
 
Originally posted by alexy2k
youth_cycler how can you say that Lambo looks Boring? :confused: Anything but I'd say? :D
Click to expand...
Boring in relation to Lamborghini. Take for example the Countach-- At the time that it was introduced, it was absolutely absurd, absolutely ridiculous, absolutely loveable. It was sensuos (sp?), and looked like no other. Compare the Murcielago to it, and take into consideration the decades in age difference, and the Murcielago looks plain vanilla. Again, this is only in relation to Lamborghini-- If any other car maker had turned out a car like this, I wouldn't be saying what I've said... but for Lamborghini, it's rather conservative.
 
Originally posted by Powerman
So is there A Murcialago for GT3?
Click to expand...

No only the diablo jgtc
 
Originally posted by Nigma
You know you would love to have it.
Click to expand...

No, not really. The upkeep on it, or any car of its caliber for that matter, would be hideous, and a Lamborghini isn't the kind of car you go tooling town with unless you're filthy rich and can afford to buy gas for it literally every other day. (Donald Trump owns a Diablo Roadster which gets an average of 9 MPG.)

Not to mention that if it breaks you're screwed, because this also isn't the kind of car you just drop off at Joe's Garage when something goes bad. Well tell me, would you trust a car worth a quarter-million dollars to the guys at your local auto shop?

And no, I wouldn't want one "just to have it" either. To me, it's pointless and a waste of money to buy something so expensive and just have it sit around unused and unseen by most of the world.

:2cents: <---Just mine, of course.
 
Back