Lap Time Competition

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanBhoy
  • 21 comments
  • 1,495 views
Messages
16
Is there a site which lets people input their lap times in competition against each other? I haven't checked on my PAL Prologue yet but the Chinese one I had gave out some sort of code for this I think?

Anyway, it could be done through trust assuming no one puts in a fake time, just lay down the constants as car and track and post your best lap time.

Is there already a site which does this (not too informed on the GT web community if there is one), and if not who fancies that we do one here?

Cheers! :)
 
Originally posted by DanBhoy
Is there a site which lets people input their lap times in competition against each other? I haven't checked on my PAL Prologue yet but the Chinese one I had gave out some sort of code for this I think?

Anyway, it could be done through trust assuming no one puts in a fake time, just lay down the constants as car and track and post your best lap time.

Is there already a site which does this (not too informed on the GT web community if there is one), and if not who fancies that we do one here?

Cheers! :)

Try here ......!;)
 
Originally posted by Cosmic
Try to beat this...
Tsukuba
Mclaren F1 Fina
Setting : Tires - racing | aids - off
Time : 50.312
at your service:
0´47.520

any other suggestions ?
 
How accurate are those times on granturismo.de?
example:
2 Laps New York - Honda NSX Takata

DalWing-Ruliweb - 03:05:614

how can you drop another 9 seconds under the GOLD time of 03:14:500?

It took me approximately 4 hours of starting / restarting that lesson until i finally snuck in at 03:14:254.
Fair enough my skills are no where near as good as alot of you people and i'd beleive someone running a 03:10:000. but 03:05:614?
is anyone able to provide a screenshot of a sub 03:07:000 time on that lesson? i just want to see to beleive.
 
Originally posted by MoeZus
How accurate are those times on granturismo.de?
example:
2 Laps New York - Honda NSX Takata

DalWing-Ruliweb - 03:05:614

how can you drop another 9 seconds under the GOLD time of 03:14:500?

ever heard of differences between the PAL and NTSC versions?
that´s one of the reasons.
another one is that the top times are from experienced drivers which do already play prologue for half a year.
and if you think 9 seconds below gold is a huge gap, look at the top times for the Fit Race car @ Citta di aria, top time is a 3´49 while gold is 4´04.

wo do verifiy the times, not all but enough to be sure the claimed times are ok,
 
Originally posted by MoeZus
How accurate are those times on granturismo.de?
example:
2 Laps New York - Honda NSX Takata

DalWing-Ruliweb - 03:05:614

how can you drop another 9 seconds under the GOLD time of 03:14:500?

It took me approximately 4 hours of starting / restarting that lesson until i finally snuck in at 03:14:254.
Fair enough my skills are no where near as good as alot of you people and i'd beleive someone running a 03:10:000. but 03:05:614?
is anyone able to provide a screenshot of a sub 03:07:000 time on that lesson? i just want to see to beleive.

I did the second best time there at just a tenth above. If I can dig up the replay of that from my big heap of replays (thousands - which explains something ... :D) I'll show you. But if you go to www.granturismo.de and challenge the time there in the proper forum, DalWing will certainly provide you the proof you need also - he's always complied with this so far.

I'll try the test at PAL again and see if it is slower, although I don't think so because when I tried it to just get all golds in PAL (I already did that in the Japanese, Chinese and Korean versions :lol: ) I got a 3'07 on my first attempt I think.
 
sorry, I didn't mean for my post to sound so negative.
I suppose i was just frustrated at the fact that it took me 4 hours to only just get a gold when other people are going 9 seconds faster after 2 laps.
I am using PAL by the way.

And I thought i had skills..
 
Originally posted by Flinx
at your service:
0´47.520

any other suggestions ?

At your service to:Mclaren...Tskuba...0.57.764-I had that time on www.granturismo.de ,but you have deleted my times so.....I posted here....!

I've tryied with Spoon Race Car on Tskuba.....1.00.147...!

BTW: On www.granturismo.de ,(when I was competing)I didn't belive that guy Dalwing and Honeycar,on some lessons they have unbeliveble times.....!:mad:
 
Originally posted by Arwin
I did the second best time there at just a tenth above. If I can dig up the replay of that from my big heap of replays (thousands - which explains something ... :D) I'll show you. But if you go to www.granturismo.de and challenge the time there in the proper forum, DalWing will certainly provide you the proof you need also - he's always complied with this so far.

I'll try the test at PAL again and see if it is slower, although I don't think so because when I tried it to just get all golds in PAL (I already did that in the Japanese, Chinese and Korean versions :lol: ) I got a 3'07 on my first attempt I think.

Damn need to practice.
just got to that test on pal and was down to a 3.16.*** after about 10 attempts only a silver.
Mind you my car control through some of the 90 degrees seems ropey but damn if i no how you shaved nearly 10 seconds off.

note to self: must practice more.
 
heh I was like that with some of the golds. The weird thing was, when I aimed for times posted on the db, I would get gold all the time, but when I started out aiming for gold, I might be off by a bit. That's how I got through some of the harder/annoying ones like the Evo at Tsukuba, and ended up with a top 10 DB time I think.
 
Originally posted by GTmaniac
At your service to:Mclaren...Tskuba...0.57.764-I had that time on www.granturismo.de ,but you have deleted my times so.....I posted here....!

I've tryied with Spoon Race Car on Tskuba.....1.00.147...!

BTW: On www.granturismo.de ,(when I was competing)I didn't belive that guy Dalwing and Honeycar,on some lessons they have unbeliveble times.....!:mad:
you are not allowed to post anything about suspicious or unbelievable times at gt.de.
i asked for some of your times and also proof of them.
since you aren´t willed or able to provide any x-port/shark-port file nor video i guess you should keep your mouth untill you have proven your, in the meantime deleted, toptimes.
in contrary of your behaviour dalwing and honey always answered with a replay.

have a nice day.
 
Everyone is going on about the times being genuine, I have the PAL version, and although there is no mention in the manual anywhere, if you press 'X' on your best time it comes up with a passcode. I presume that this will solve all *****y arguments about genuine or not, I can only assume that Polyphony are planning an official scoreboard or something like that.

Apologies if someone has already mentioned this, but I couldn't find it in this thread previously.

Matt W (newbie)
 
Its allready mentioned but theres a danger of the codes being decrypted and allowing anyone to make "real" codes for times they didnt get.
 
Originally posted by Flinx
you are not allowed to post anything about suspicious or unbelievable times at gt.de.
i asked for some of your times and also proof of them.
since you aren´t willed or able to provide any x-port/shark-port file nor video i guess you should keep your mouth untill you have proven your, in the meantime deleted, toptimes.
in contrary of your behaviour dalwing and honey always answered with a replay.

have a nice day.

good answer 👍

For the time being I'm just gonna sit on the fact that I've got all golds in all the test's whether its by .001 or by 9 seconds I couldnt care less, I'm happy with the achievment

I believe that if you have not got a replay yourself to back up accusations you should keep your thoughts to yourself

QUOTE: No matter how fast you are, there will always be someone faster...
 
Originally posted by Bollocks#999

QUOTE: No matter how fast you are, there will always be someone faster...

Best said. Didn't believe what some people can do. They can drive just a second faster per lap, but we all know how much the second is.

And I don't believe to many times I have seen in past years trought the internet - I believe only when I see the full replay, screens are just partially accepted as a proof. And nine seconds sounds pretty unbelievable to me in terms of overpassing the gold.
 
Back