Marketing reasons or not, they'll still go with the best they have available. Personally, I hate nationality bias. It's just a low form of racism as far as I'm concerned.
Less racism than overt flag-waving behavior. Ultra-nationalism makes for good advertising bucks back home... Which is what inspired the A1GP series.
It's not any more racist than the Olympics. And, though I hesitate to point it out, Lewis is a black driver on a very white team...
As do I, but still, it's their team, they can run it any way they want.
I don't see anything wrong with their current line-up. They have two British drivers who've both won drivers championships and who are both giving them results. They might not be fighting as hard for the championship as they'd like, but that's down to the car more than the drivers.
I've gone to school with many unlikeable idiots. And some of them from other countries. Has nothing to do with a team picking a qualified and talented driver over another qualified and talented driver simply because of their nationality. It's no different from another team picking a driver simply because of the sponsor money they bring in (because, in the end, that's what patriotic branding is all about). Except in this case, the drivers they've picked are pretty good drivers who aren't as rusty and crusty as Michael Schumacher.
And likeable is up for interpretation. Would I put an unlikeable person on my team if that guarantees me a championship? You won't find many team managers who'd say no to that... I mean... come on... look at how many arrogant arses are playing futbol in Europe at the moment...![]()
I'd actually argue that two drivers of the same nationality is actually kind of limiting for marketing because quite obviously you only have one country interested. For example, currently Vodafone can make plenty of adverts for the British public featuring either WDC or both of them...but when it comes to any other country, they are kind of limited. The global brand exposure isn't quite as good then...and thats the point of being involved in F1. If Vodafone simply wanted brand exposure and famous figures in Britain, they would have stuck to football or tennis.
I think its pretty clear Button was hired because of his talent, his nationality made things easier sure, but he would have been hired even if he was Libyan, North Korean...whatever. McLaren were not getting the most out of Kovalainen and needed a driver who was much closer to Hamilton on pace, more consistently.
You could make the same argument for Button being an easier personality to work with and much better PR for sponsors. But again, even without this, McLaren were going to hire him anyway.
By the way, McLaren had actually approached Barrichello way before they approached Button in 2009, but Rubens turned them down as he had already signed with Williams at the time. If McLaren really wanted the double-Brit combination, why did they go for Button last?
I feel confident in saying F1 is almost entirely without national bias in this respect. And so it should be. All of the teams hire the best possible personnel for their organisation on talent above anything else. The only time nationality comes into this is when a certain driver's sponsors are willing to put a big pot of gold down because of a new GP (e.g. Indian GP, Kathikeyan).
So to get back to the original point of this discussion - McLaren won't want to lose Lewis Hamilton because of his talent, regardless of his nationality and its potential benefits. In the same way that losing Raikkonen to Ferrari wasn't exactly made easier just because he was Finnish.
I'd say they approached Barrichello because they would assume Brawn would have kept Button as he'd won the Championship. After all, it would be rather silly not signing your championship winning driver again.
The way I see it Alonso won the psychological battle even with the team backing his team mate. Lewis therefore won the political battle, and Alonso left.
Seeing Alonso stopped those perfectly timed few extra seconds in Hungary's pitlane, just to teach the 'kid' a lesson ... and watching Dennis' FURY afterwards was, and still is, very funny, bordering priceless![]()
The way I see it Alonso won the psychological battle even with the team backing his team mate. Lewis therefore won the political battle, and Alonso left.
Seeing Alonso stopped those perfectly timed few extra seconds in Hungary's pitlane, just to teach the 'kid' a lesson ... and watching Dennis' FURY afterwards was, and still is, very funny, bordering priceless![]()
Aw come on, you know better than that. McLaren would have approached several drivers regardless of their current or potential contracts, it happens every year. Most of the time, the teams and drivers do it to "scare" each other into improving their conditions or making a decision. Even if McLaren had assumed Button was signed up, they would have (and did in the end) made an approach to scope him out, even if it was to try and worry Kovalainen into signing better conditions or make another driver make a decision to sign for them.
I dunno, in some respects I can understand Alonso's frustration. He went to a championship-contending team with the goal of winning. He is told that the team are hiring a rookie as his teammate. Would you not be annoyed and frustrated that not only is the rookie fast enough to beat you but the team are not helping you at all?
The final straw for Alonso was when Ron Dennis famously said "We werent racing Kimi, we were basically racing Fernando.".
Of course, I agree Alonso was weak for running away and he dealt with the situation poorly. But I also think he was pretty badly treated by McLaren as it was clear they were almost completely behind Hamilton. It almost felt like Alonso was hired just to be beaten by Hamilton. Hamilton also did nothing to help that relationship, and he has admitted as much recently.
Hungary 2007 wasn't just Alonso's fault too though, that was apparently caused by Hamilton breaking an earlier agreement.
To me that episode proves Hamilton had got to him in a big way. It was also the very definition of grossly unprofessional as well. I would have fired Alonso on the spot if I was the team boss.
I disagree with any suggestion that Alonso did anything be lose the battle with Hamilton. No matter which way you want to look at it. He ran away from the team. Hamilton didn't.
Hamilton has said his next contract terms with McLaren will come as a suprise to them, he says he will demand time to himself and not be committed to doing nearly as much sponsorship work for the team.
So the balls in McLarens court now. Maybe they should give Di restsa the new tennis racket?
Haven't you read the posts on this?Does he really think it's going to be different elsewhere?
I hope McLaren gets rid of him.
Haven't you read the posts on this?
As said above McLaren are renowned for slaving their drivers around for sponsors. On the other hand Red Bull are more moderate in their driver commitments outside of driving.
Link"When I re-sign the contract with McLaren they are going to be shocked at how many days they are not going to be able to make me do,"
What? Grossly unprofessional? Alonso couldn't be more professional than that. He coldly, professionnaly, ruthlessly, showed Hamilton that he wasn't there to be pushed around and he didn't care if Lewis was the owner's dear and favourite. Lewis tried to own him a big way, Alonso decided to show him - and the entire team - that he cared less about sticking at McLaren than he cared about being respected in the team. Had he acted in aany other way he would've become Dennis/Lewis 🤬
Watch. Beautifully done. Respect earner in the long term, with the sacrifice of his job coming, but that didn't matter to him and THAT was what Dennis didn't expect (of course you may not like it to be that way, but that's just how it was):
~ Alonso basically saying "🤬 off" ~
Raikkonen demanded similar terms at Ferrari (less commercial work), so its not surprising.
But Hamilton is kind of right but also silly to do what he's doing. He's right in that ok, he is clearly fast enough to deserve a much better car than McLaren are delivering the past 3 years. But he is silly because really, where else can he go?
I fear if he isn't careful he will run into a Jacques Villenueve situation (though perhaps not quite so dramatic).
If I was McLaren I'd try and keep Hamilton though I would definitely push the negogiatons here by pointing to Lewis' mistakes, the fact there are some promising drivers floating about and that he has little other options. Lewis certainly doesn't hold all the cards here.